similar to: what is actually a trunk in a sip trunk?

I'm try to bond a few interfaces together with the hopes of getting increased throughput, and I'm using a cisco Catalyst 2900 as the switch. I've tried using mode 0, 5, and 6 with nothing special on the switch, and mode 4 with some ports "trunked" together (I have a feeling that the "trunking" that the 2900 does is not 802.3ad, as it disabled the ports it saw as

HI All. I have a linux box connected to a switch network with 2 network interfaces, how would I able to ''trunk'' these 2 interfaces? options I can see are: - ethernet bonding - iproute2? - teql Which one are the best to use? I''m curretly having problem with ethernet bonding, my setup are as follow: ip add: 192.168.10.30/24 I do: # modprobe bonding # ip addr add

Many ITSP are using loadbalancers, so if somebody registers on a sip peer with specific dns host, an incoming call may be received from a different ip and the host value in peer section doesnt match, so it will go to default context. For example Telekom or 1&1, biggest providers in Germany are using too many different addresses that its not practical to define them all (up to 50 hosts

Hi, ------- ------- | B |eth0---------eth0| C | | |eth1---------eth1| | ------- ------- In an attempt to have the install setup to increase speed and/or reliability of a link between two linux machines (for example in case of a wireless connection), I read that there were more than one solution, for example the old eql driver, bonding

With the current talk on bonding, I have a few questions of my own. I'm setting up a KVM host with CentOS 6.3 x86_64 on which I'd like to attach the VMs to a bonded interface. My target setup is one where two GigE NICs are bonded and then the KVM bridge interface is attached to the bonded interface. Initially I tried to use the balance-alb mode (mode6), but had little luck (receiving

Hello, Please CC replies I'm not subscribed. Performance with samba and only samba degrades terribly when we use the bonding driver to aggregate two ethernet cards. Instead of a steady file copy it seems to go in spurts. If I pull out one of the network cables (doesn't matter which) performance resumes to full speed. I can pull the cable in the middle of a transfer and it will go

On 03/08/2017 07:39 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Yes it is really hard! >> >> ip address add 192.168.0.1/24 dev enp0s25 >> ip route add default via 192.168.0.254 dev enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > This is still a deliberately trivial

Hello, I''m trying to setup Xen on a machine with 2 physical network devices using linux bonding without success. I haven''t received any answer on my question on xen-users, the only discussion on this seems to be at http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg01174.html Could someone shed some light on state/ plans regarding Xen and bonding? Regards --

Getting "bnx2i: iSCSI not supported, dev=eth0" for all the NIC adapters on all of my R710's running CentOS 5.5. Here is an sample of the error messages: bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target module parameters must be specified, otherwise bonding will not detect link failures! see bonding.txt for details. bonding: bond0: setting mode to active-backup

Hi, I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1). All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different options to the bonding module for each bond. I have tried every conceivable incantation of options and cannot get the

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

I four nodes setup to do active-backup bonding and the drivers loaded for the bonded network interfaces vary between tg3 and e100. All interfaces with the e100 driver loaded report errors much like what you see here: bonding: bond0: link status definitely down for interface eth2, disabling it e100: eth2: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for

I'm running into a situation where a bogus bonded interface named "bond0" is being created, in addition to the desired "bond2" interface. Can anyone confirm this? Anyone know why it's happening or what I do to get rid of it? I wanted to start my numbering scheme at 2 instead of 0, which I didn't think would be a problem. As you can see, I have no reference

I use bonding under CENTOS4.5 x32_62. I have these weird messages when I'm restarting network. Do you have any ideas how to fix this? (there is similar bug for centos5 http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2404, but the author says that it worked for him in centos4...) Thanks Vitaly Dec 17 08:34:21 3_10 kernel: bonding: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of eth0 - 00:1A:64:0A:DC:9C - is still in

hi, bonding does not work when booting kernel-PAE-2.6.18-164.el5 module load failed on unresolved symbols Sep 17 11:36:53 monitor kernel: bonding: Unknown symbol ndisc_build_skb Sep 17 11:36:53 monitor kernel: bonding: Unknown symbol in6_dev_finish_destroy Sep 17 11:36:53 monitor kernel: bonding: Unknown symbol ndisc_send_skb Sep 17 11:36:53 monitor kernel: bonding: Unknown symbol

Dear All, Please ignore my previous mail I have using CentOS 4.4 Linux and Kernel Version is 2.6.9-42.EL I have configured Cluster Suite with 2 servers Server 1 : 192.168.13.110 IP Address and hostname is primary Server 2 : 192.168.13.179 IP Address and hostname is secondary Floating : 192.168.13.83 IP Address (Assumed by currently active server) I have configured Ethernet Channel Bonding in

Hi, I am currently struggling with the right way to configure a bonding device via kickstart (via PXE). I am installing servers which have "eno" network interfaces. Instead of the expected bonding device with two active slaves (bonding mode is balance-alb), I get a bonding device with only one active slave and an independent, non-bonded network device. Also the bonding device

Hi list How is ether bonding handled with Xen? Is it possible to use bonding inside a xen virtual server by bonding dom0s eth0 and eth1 or should a domU connect to dom0s "bond0" (eth0-eth1)? Is there any xen configuration examples using bonding somewhere? Thanks :) -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Lars E. D. Jensen - DCmedia ledj@dcmedia.biz - http://dcmedia.biz PGP PUBLIC KEY:

OK, at least its not an *issue* with Gluster. I didn't expect any but you never know. I have been amused at the 'lack' of discussion on Teaming performance found on Google searches. There are lots of 'here it is and here is how to set it up' articles/posts, but no 'ooh-wee-wow it is awesome' comments. It seems that for most people Bonding has worked it kinks out

Hi all, Someone played with kickstart bonding with centos 6.4 ? CentOS 6.4, as upstream now support ifcae bonding in kickstart network section. I've an issue with configuring a second bonding iface in kicstart on CentOS 6.4. The first bonding (bond0) works as espected but the second is not configured during installation. I've a 6 nic server (two for "puclic" network, two for