similar to: VoiceMail Issue

Hi, did anybody manage to configure Asterisk (1.4.8) with imap voicemail storage together with an Microsoft Exchange Server (2003)? I can connect my asterisk to a local dovecot imap server without problems. But if I change the settings to our exchange server I can?t connect... Here is my config: imapserver=exchangeserver imapport=143 expungeonhangup=no imapfolder=INBOX imapflags=notls

Dear list, I have a data frame of survey respondents, a little like this: set.seed(20081215) n <- 100 dat <- data.frame(id=1:100, addr1=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr2=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE), addr3=sample(LETTERS, n, replace=TRUE)) head(dat) id addr1 addr2 addr3 1 1 R H Q 2 2 H C K 3 3

Hi, I have a question about redirecting message to a multiple addresses. I have an user script like following: require ["copy"]; redirect :copy "addr1 at dom.ain"; redirect :copy "addr2 at dom.ain"; All works fine, but if addr1 at ... has exceeded quota, this script seems stop working and addr2 at ... doesn't receive this message too. Is this correct

I am sure some of you can give me an insight into this. This is more towards the database design for the scenario below: Say for example, I have a person table and this person can have different address types. One could be Home and the other could be say Office. Should be model this Table people id fname lname Table addresses id person_id addr1 addr2 .... or Table people id fname lname

I'm trying to test IMAP in 1.4.17 and it appears to be not working. I've compiled imap-2007 with the following on a CentOS 5 box: make slx EXTRACFLAGS="-I/usr/include/openssl -fPIC" and I've configured and compiled asterisk with the following: ./configure --with-imap=/usr/local/src/imap-2007 The compile and install went just fine, no warnings and no errors that I saw.

Thanks, Ashutosh. Yes, either TTI or TLI could be used to limit the transform if we do it in CGP rather than the DAG. The real question I have is whether it is legal to read the extra memory, regardless of whether this is a masked load or something else. Note that the x86 backend already does this, so either my proposal is ok for x86, or we're already doing an illegal optimization: define

In the sample program below I have a form of 6 text fields, in a scrolling window, followed by a row of function buttons. Problems: 1) For data entry purposes I''d like the function buttons NOT to be entered by pressing Tab keys, and retain their ''clickability'', but when the user Tab''s out of the last scrolling field (postcode) to have the form scroll to the

Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bus/hwsq.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bus/hwsq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bus/hwsq.h index 3394a5e..ebf709c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bus/hwsq.h +++

On Feb 27, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Nuno and Arnold: > > Thank you all for the input. > > Let me coin a term, say "clique" for this discussion to avoid unnecessary confusion. > A clique is statically or dynamically allocated type-free stretch of memory. A "clique" > 1) is maximal in the sense

Now that the kmap atomic index is stored in task struct provide a preemptible variant. On context switch the maps of an outgoing task are removed and the map of the incoming task are restored. That's obviously slow, but highmem is slow anyway. The kmap_local.*() functions can be invoked from both preemptible and atomic context. kmap local sections disable migration to keep the resulting

Hello, everyone. No need to read this message. I'm posting for documentation for other poor, ignorant slobs like me who are struggling to pull together the many technologies to make converged networks happen. Hopefully, this will help save someone else the time I spent. I started the below email until I realized I had solved multiple parts of a compound problem but not all at the same time.

On 2/27/13 11:21 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: > On Feb 27, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, Nuno and Arnold: >> >> Thank you all for the input. >> >> Let me coin a term, say "clique" for this discussion to avoid unnecessary confusion. >> A clique is statically or dynamically allocated

Hello, I have several voicemail accounts that share the same IMAP mailbox (same imapuser), and I'd like to store their messages in separate IMAP subfolders. I tried to set 'imapfolder' settings on a per voicemail account basis, but it does not seem to work. All messages keep being stored in the same INBOX folder. Should I file a feature request on the asterisk-dev list, or is there a

hi folks. i'm experimenting with iaxmodem + hylafax using DID to determine where to send the fax to it's final destination. however i have difficulties passing the DID information from iaxmodem to hylafax. in extensions.conf: exten => _XXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem0/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Dial(IAX2/iaxmodem1/${EXTEN}|20|r) exten => _XXXX,n,Busy exten => _XXXX,n,Hangup

When gcc 4.8 inlines this function, it eats up 16 bytes on the stack every time. Eventually we hit warnings because our stack grew too much: ramnve0.c:1383:1: error: the frame size of 1496 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes We fix this by preventing inlining for this function. Signed-off-by: St?phane Marchesin <marcheu at chromium.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/ramfuc.h | 2

Hi, Nuno and Arnold: Thank you all for the input. Let me coin a term, say "clique" for this discussion to avoid unnecessary confusion. A clique is statically or dynamically allocated type-free stretch of memory. A "clique" 1) is maximal in the sense that a clique dose not have any enclosing data structure that can completely cover or, partially

[cc'ing cfe-dev because this may require some interpretation of language law] My understanding is that the compiler has the freedom to access extra data in C/C++ (not sure about other languages); AFAIK, the LLVM LangRef is silent about this. In C/C++, this is based on the "as-if rule": http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/as_if So the question is: where should the optimizer

Dear friends, I ran the following in my console.Assume I already have the postgresql connection . >> class D < ActiveRecord::Base >> end => nil >> D.set_table_name "users" => nil >> D.column_names => ["id", "name", "fname", "lname", "password", "addr1", "addr2",

Hello! I just joined the list and will be happy to help where I can in my limited experience, but also come to the table with a question. I think there's something I'm missing regarding shared mailboxes and ACLs, so I will describe my situation and see if I am understanding correctly (running Dovecot 1.1.10). I have read over the Dovecot Wiki many times and have scoured many forums but

Hi Ben - Thanks for your response. For the sake of argument, let's narrow the scope of the problem to eliminate some of the variables you have rightfully cited. Let's assume we're not dealing with volatiles, atomics, or FP operands. We'll even guarantee that the extra loaded value is never used. This is, in fact, the scenario that http://reviews.llvm.org/rL263446 is concerned