similar to: Asterisk 11 - looking for ideas and a possible solution

Hi - I figured this was probably the best place to ask this question Is there anyone that has done anything practical with the API and/or Real Time Database config? If so, I would like to pick your brains if I may. Thanks - G -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello Folks; I have an Asterisk server Asterisk 11.7.0 built by root @xxxxxxxxxxx on a x86_64 running Linux on 2013-12-27 18:47:44 UTC No FreePBX, no AsteriskNOW, no Elastix. Just Asterisk. Is there an API out there that anyone knows of that I can pass commands, etc to Asterisk? Creating Extensions, adding voicemail users, setting up voicemail, etc? I'm kind of clueless. Is there something

This is going to sound like a dumb-ass question: The device that allows you to bridge Asterisk (or any other PBX) into the pstn.. What is that called? So, I guess, not a SIP trunk, but the device that actually IS the SIP trunk. Am I making sense? Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello All; I'm attempting to build the dahdi on an OpenVZ instance: Linux serverx 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5.028stab095.1 #1 SMP Mon Oct 24 20:49:24 MSD 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Now, the kernel says that I have the proper one installed, as you can see from above. However, when I run the make all, this is what I see: You do not appear to have the sources for the

Okay - maybe I'm just suffering from a moment of horrible ADD - but, I'm a little lost. I see that Asterisk 12 has a nice REST API - very nice - something I can use. However, and this is gonna sound dumb - but all the CLI commands are different now. What did I miss? Can anyone, please, anyone point me to a good, simple to understand tutorial on the new CLI? I am so, so freaking lost!

*I'm trying to build an application that provides statistics of calls*>* and call recording. Someone told me this could be done out of band*>* with a SPAN (?) port that would replicate SIP and media packets to a*>* separate NIC without having to actually pass the real-calls thru*>* asterisk. It was explained that this SPAN port would in the SBC*>* would replicate data

Hi...I'm using BackTrack linux for a class I'm taking and using a program in wine that is just using all of my memory. Any ideas on how I can limit this program from using all of my memory. I'm on a mac running vmware fusion 4.0 and have backtrack 5r1 as a vm

Hey, all. I've got some irksome issues, and would love it if someone could show me where I'm going wrong. First and foremost, I can access the folders, create new ones, etc. But copying stuff from an existing Windows share (with ACLs), not so much. Likewise when I try to assign permissions. I wind up with stuff like [2010/12/01 02:56:34, 0]

Hi all! A quick question: I just moved from Windows over to Linux, using Backtrack 4, which is based off of Ubuntu if I am not mistaken. One of the programs that I really need to get running, www.magicworkstation.com , really needs one of the later (unstable) releases of WINE to work. Well, so I go to follow the instructions to get the updated version, using the Ubuntu instructions and I get a

From: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com> Fixes LP: #806537 Signed-off-by: Simon Deziel <simon.deziel at gmail.com> --- rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn | 7 ++++++- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn b/rulefiles/linux/ignore.d.server/openvpn index 2b4bfd6..d80f42f 100644 ---

Hello Everyone. We have: Asterisk 1.4.21.2 zaptel-1.4.11 libpri-1.4.5 Sangoma A101D Connected to a PRI Cicso 7960G phones (About 30 of them) We have a problem with dropped calls that has going on for a long time. We get up to 5 dropped calls on a bad day. They all seem to be incoming calls. I have a recording of what my users report a dropped call sounds like right before it drops

On 30/05/2020 12:32, hw at gc-24.de wrote: Hi hw, > I'm looking for a good way to create a constant data stream that will occupy a > bandwidth of about 2--5Mbit/sec between two remote hosts over the internet. I > have full access to the hosts involved. > > My first attempt to use scp to copy data from /dev/null on host A to /dev/null > on host B, but scp says

On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: >> The implementation of llvm-objdump does have a MachODump.cpp for use with the -m option that I could do the a similar hack otool(1) like hack and special case 32-bit ARM cpus. And at least it contains the ugliness. But this does not really help the non -m case and I suspect ELF objects may face

Howdy. I have a application I'm developing where I need to encrypt the data inside an OGG stream. I will be using a regular block cypher (AES, or others... configurable); and I would like to encrypt the pages in an OGG stream. I'm thinking that if I sit my decrypter in between the reading application and the encrypted file, you should be able to use all the normal seeking

Hi, Please let me start a new thread for this. During the past weeks Debian accumulated three bug reports, which seem to be the manifestations of a Syslinux regression between 3.86 and 4.00 (see #604245): http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604245 Sony vaio Z12C5E USB boot of http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-amd64/current/images/hd-media/boot.img.gz

Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600

On 6/26/12 5:07 PM, amruth.rd wrote: > Hello, > > I am curious to know if LLVM offers any passes to do interprocedural slicing, I need to eliminate most of the computations(possibly all, if they don't influence the control flow), but the control flow of the program should be maintained at all cost. I did see an optimization pass to print the CFG of a function without its body to a

Hi, I am debugging private backend and faced interesting problem: sometimes spill hoisting creates double stores. (some output from -debug-only=regalloc). First hoisting: Checking redundant spills for 0 at 16r in %vreg19 [16r,144B:0)[144B,240B:1)[240B,280r:2)[296r,416B:3)[416B,456r:4)[472r,592B:5) 0 at 16r 1 at 144B-phi 2 at 240B-phi 3 at 296r 4 at 416B-phi 5 at 472r Merged to stack int: SS#0

On Mar 17, 2006, at 7:54 AM, Eric Kidd wrote: > Unfortunately, this generates really weird code on the LLVM 1.6 > PowerPC backend: > > LBB_matches_1: ; regex6 > lbz r4, 0(r3) > LBB_matches_2: ; NodeBlock > rlwinm r5, r4, 0, 24, 31 > cmplwi cr0, r5, 98 > blt cr0, LBB_matches_4 ; LeafBlock > LBB_matches_3: ; LeafBlock1 >

Hello, At a client site yesterday I installed a dozen GrandStream GXP-2000's with 1.1.0.13 firmware but I had to backtrack and reactivate the old PBX and phones: network access for users windoze PC's through the phone's switch port was unbearably slow, making it almost impossible to work. When plugging back PC's directly to the LAN speed was normal again. On my test setup