similar to: combine 2 data.frames in dependence of the ID

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "combine 2 data.frames in dependence of the ID"

2012 Mar 20
0
labeling rows in heatmap.2
how can i put the row labels on the left hand of the heatmap in heatmap.2? abnr<-structure(c(1, 0.678622097406395, 0.670294749652918, -0.0016314464654279, -0.000519068106572792, 0.199581999119988, -0.0106623494189115, 0.0840111691399559, -0.0461494399639137, 0.249279171677728, NA, 1, 0.757114062773504, 0.0352642759270137, -0.0255518450373996, 0.0943268190664674, -0.0536269679247722,
2006 Apr 13
1
ast_sched_runq ran 281 scheduled tasks all at once
Just noticed that I occasionally get these messages:- Apr 12 09:27:03 WARNING[11390] chan_iax2.c: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 281 scheduled tasks all at once Apr 13 09:13:18 WARNING[11390] chan_iax2.c: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 1987 scheduled tasks all at once Apr 13 12:47:56 WARNING[11390] chan_iax2.c: chan_iax2: ast_sched_runq ran 1804 scheduled tasks all at once Are they anything to be
2012 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
All the LLVM lab FNT builders were reporting failures in the same set of tests (scimark2, LivermooreLoops, some others). Now they've all turned green but the same tests are still failing. I don't see any commits to deliberately make the FNT pass, so it looks like someone broke failure detection... Note that the FNT "report" text became empty at the same time. Here's what
2012 Dec 11
0
[LLVMdev] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > All the LLVM lab FNT builders were reporting failures in the same set of > tests > (scimark2, LivermooreLoops, some others). Now they've all turned green but > the > same tests are still failing. I don't see any commits to deliberately make > the > FNT pass, so it looks like someone
2012 Dec 11
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
Hello everyone, It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the working instance, but the reality could be different... I planned to rollback to the last known-to-be-good revision and
2012 Dec 11
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. Thanks Galina -----Original Message----- From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:42 AM To: Galina Kistanova Cc: Duncan Sands; llvm-lab-wg at lists.minormatter.com; Galina Kistanova; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed On Tue,
2012 Dec 11
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > It might make sense to start from rebooting the buildmaster, just to make sure everything is all right on this end. > Yesterday I have tried to apply the latest changes from zorg and some of them are broken. > Theoretically, checkconfig shouldn't affect the
2012 Dec 17
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
This issue is back: FNT bots are reporting success in spite of tests failing, and the "report" text is empty again. Did someone change something? Ciao, Duncan. On 12/12/12 07:53, Duncan Sands wrote: > On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: >> The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. > > The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report"
2012 Dec 12
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-lab-wg] FNT testers reporting success even though they failed
On 11/12/12 23:16, Galina Kistanova wrote: > The problem remains after the buildmaster restart. The FNT builders are now all failing again, and the "report" is no longer empty. Does anyone know what fixed them? Ciao, Duncan. > > Thanks > > Galina > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Blaikie [mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday,
2012 Feb 21
5
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
All, This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. They were probably caused by my commit: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines Changed paths: M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/LLVMContextImpl.h M /llvm/trunk/lib/VMCore/Type.cpp PR1210: make uniquing of struct and
2012 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. > They were probably caused by my commit: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines > Changed paths: >
2016 Jul 20
3
[Bug 12029] New: Makefile missing dep gives parallel race for rounding.h
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12029 Bug ID: 12029 Summary: Makefile missing dep gives parallel race for rounding.h Product: rsync Version: 3.1.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee: wayned at
2011 Nov 09
1
[LLVMdev] Difference in behavior between local machine and buildbot
Hi I'm running the nightly test suite locally and getting a difference with the output from this buildbot (http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-debian-fnt/builds/1168/steps/make.test-suite/logs/stdio) For .ll tests the buildbot does the following (look for spirit.cpp in that link. Only comes up twice, one of which is this one)
2012 Feb 21
1
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
On 21 February 2012 11:45, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > Either way, I would try speculatively reverting to ensure it is this patch. > If so, we can keep experimenting with the patch, but it's important to get > the builders back. There are several others seeing the failure as well. OK, I've reverted it. Duncan is letting me play on the build slave
2012 Feb 21
0
[LLVMdev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-x86_64-debian-fnt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Jay Foad <jay.foad at gmail.com> wrote: > All, > > This buildbot is getting lots of assertion failures in the test suite. > They were probably caused by my commit: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r151049 | foad | 2012-02-21 09:25:52 +0000 (Tue, 21 Feb 2012) | 6 lines > Changed paths: >
2018 Apr 17
1
Minor glitch in optim()
Having worked with optim() and related programs for years, it surprised me that I haven't noticed this before, but optim() is inconsistent in how it deals with bounds constraints specified at infinity. Here's an example: # optim-glitch-Ex.R x0<-c(1,2,3,4) fnt <- function(x, fscale=10){ yy <- length(x):1 val <- sum((yy*x)^2)*fscale } grt <- function(x, fscale=10){ nn
2013 Feb 13
3
match in dependence of 2 columns
Hello, i want to match a column of one data.frame to another, my problem is, that i only want to match the data, if 2 columns are equal. i have a example: data.frame1 cu.nr. name value A 1 Evo 100 B 1 Mer 80 C 2 Ford
2013 Mar 08
4
create bar chart with different totals in a bar
Hello together, perhabs anyone of you, has an ideal, how i can do this: I have a matrix, like this one: [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] abnr2 11425 11425 11555 11888 TIME 2 1 1 2 Cat 1 2 1
2016 Aug 24
0
Issue with acl_xattr:ignore system acls in 4.5rc2
Hi Eric, On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 07:57:36AM -0600, Eric Eastman wrote: > >> The line causing the problem with 4.5rc2 is: > >> acl_xattr:ignore system acls = yes > > > > this change was introduced in > > <https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028> > > > > Before explaining the gory details, one question: why are you setting > >
2005 Dec 09
0
rpmbuild error on dovecot 0.99.11
my linux server is redhat AS 3 update 5. I download dovecot 0.99.11 source rpm to rebuild a binary rpm package I issued command rpmbuild -ba dovecot.spec after a few mins of works, rpmbuild process stopped with errors .............. gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -O2 -g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts