similar to: Open Software License v. 3.0

Hi, I'm trying to find the maximum (likelihood) of a function. Therefore, I'm trying to minimize the negative likelihood function: # params: vector containing values of mu and sigma # params[1] - mu, params[2]- sigma # dat: matrix of data pairs y_i and s_i # dat[,1] - column of y_i , dat[,2] column of s_i negll <- function(params,dat,constant=0) { for(i in 1:length(dat[,1])) {

The URL listed under https://svn.r-project.org/R/trunk/share/licenses/license.db for the ACM license, http://www.acm.org/publications/policies/softwarecrnotice , gives a 404 error. I think this should be replaced by https://www.acm.org/publications/policies/software-copyright-notice ? For what it's worth, the original page did exist as recently as 5 April 2016:

[resending, cutting out git pull-request output to make message smaller] Hi all, I have written a COM32 module called "acpioff", that, not surprisingly, powers off a machine using ACPI. I have tested it only using pxelinux.0 with a SeaBIOS/Qemu virtual machine. Since the changeset pulls in a "Linux-ized" version of the open source ACPI Component Architecture, it was too big

I''d like to send this patch to upstream lkml/linux-acpi, but I want to make sure that the x86 side wants this too. The _OSI method is a way for platform ACPI firmware to determine the features and capabilities of the OS running on the system. This is usually done by calling the _OSI method with various strings in the _INI method of an ACPI device. The strings are things like

Hi, I've had problems copying files to Windows shares from my CentOS 7 machine lately. I originally got this in the desktop file manager, but find that I can also reproduce using gvfs-copy. "cp" to the directory mounted by gvfs works just fine, on the other hand. Also, the problem does not occur with small files - I think anything below 64k is OK. The following command sequence

Hi, I have Lenovo laptop with an Intel wireless and Bluetooth adapter, running CentOS 6.9. The wireless works just fine, but I can't seem to get Bluetooth to work. When I try to force it up from the command line I get # hciconfig hci0 up Can't init device hci0: Invalid request code (56) There is also a similar message message in /var/log/messages from start-up on boot. The device

Hi all, I have written a COM32 module called "acpioff", that, not surprisingly, powers off a machine using ACPI. I have tested it only using pxelinux.0 with a SeaBIOS/Qemu virtual machine. Since the changeset pulls in a "Linux-ized" version of the open source ACPI Component Architecture, it was too big to post as a patches to the list. See the git pull-request output below.

By way of introduction, I manage YottaDB (https://yottadb.com and https://gitlab.com/YottaDB). The core of YottaDB is a hierarchical key-value datastore (https://docs.yottadb.com/MultiLangProgGuide/cprogram.html and https://gitlab.com/YottaDB/DB/YDB). The code base is mature (in daily production use since 1986), and very performant, with strongly ACID transactions, and replication (to ensure

Greetings. I'm a newbie Samba user; I spent the entire weekend reading the HOWTO's and various other tutorials and docs from around the web. So if this is a naieve question, please don't hesitate the tell me to go back and RTFM some more. :-) I downloaded and compiled 3.0.0rc4 from source on a Mandrake 9.1 system (with all MDK updates installed) with the following configure line:

ACM Software Copyright and License Agreement I have often seen the use of routines from the ACM Collected Algorithms, i.e. <netlib.org/toms/> (CALGO, or Trans. On Math. Software, TOMS), in Open Source programs, maybe also in some R packages --- and sometimes these programs are distributed under the GPL license, sometimes under proprietary licenses, e.g. in Scilab. The use of these CALGO

(Subject: renamed as thread hijacked from the ParallelR thread --Dirk) On 23 April 2009 at 14:44, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: | Aside from R there are the add-on packages. | | A frequency table showing the licenses of the CRAN packages indicates | that the all or almost all packages have some sort of free software license | with GPL licenses being most common. (A few packages have restrictions |

(Seems to me that Icecast folks would be particularly concerned about this. Please consider the following, lend your signatures, and also *send it on* to appropriate interested parties. If you are a blogger or know clueful bloggers, please try to have it posted in a highly visible forum. -- Seth Johnson) Hello folks, Please review the important joint statement below, related to the WIPO

Hi, please, can SOMEBODY help me to find the right characters to fit into the field \details{ ... ... License: \tab ???? \cr } of the description file for a new R-package? When building the package I always get: * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... WARNING Non-standard license specification: What license is it under? Last time I just used "GPL" and it worked, this time it

Hi, I have a Solaris 10 server exporting UFS directories using built-in NFS. I've built Samba 3.0.20b from OpenPKG (www.openpkg.org). I have a Solaris 10 (x86) client mounting the NFS share and opening OpenDocument files using StarOffice 8 (SO8, aka OO2.0). I also have a Windows 2003 Terminal Server mounting the Samba share and opening documents with SO8. This is a temporary development

Martyn Plummer <plummerm <at> iarc.fr> writes: > > I think this is covered well by the CRAN repository policy: > http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html > > The two key license requirements are that: > 1) CRAN must have a perpetual license to distribute the package > 2) The package license should be listed here: >

Dear List, I'm now working on MLE and OSL estimators.I just noticed that the textbook argues they are joint normal distributed.But how to prove the conclusion? Thanks for your time in advance! Best, Ning

On 15 June 2018 at 21:07, Keith Keller via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > On 2018-06-16, Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: >> >> You agreed to an EULA that says you will not distribute things that you >> get from that paid subscription. You can do it, and be in violation of >> the terms of your subscription. > > Is this

The package elfutils-debuginfod-client is needed for even a minimal install, but it is not available on most mirrors. I suspect some are excluding mirroring debuginfo packages with just a *debuginfo* pattern to rsync, where they should do something like *-debuginfo-*.rpm (which should be good for now as I don't see any package with just "debuginfo" in the name, even in Fedora). The

Hi all, We are busy developing some software (some is web based, others not) and I am having a bit of hard time understanding (or rather, choosing) a license model to work with, We will offer some free software (PHP based scripts, and even Windows based applications) and for this I'm sure the GPL, or even LGPL (for the network side?) will work fine. But, we also need to suppose these

Dear all, from "Writing R Extensions": The string ?Unlimited?, meaning that there are no restrictions on distribution or use other than those imposed by relevant laws (including copyright laws). If a package license restricts a base license (where permitted, e.g., using GPL-3 or AGPL-3 with an attribution clause), the additional terms should be placed in file LICENSE (or LICENCE),