similar to: working with huge memory: single precision?

The problem is not specific to this list. Any kind of public list may mean that other subscribers (or even the whole world) can see your email address. So whenever you mail to a (public) list there is a good chance that afterwards, you will get more spam. Not really much can be done about it, at least not on the side of the list, since any of the subscribers may be a spammer, who can know... All

I agree that no action should be taken. It's somewhat mystifying that the robot known as "Amy Kristen" responds so quickly after my post, and with such regularity (so far twice per hour), using perhaps several email addresses - and using the correct "Reply-To" headers. But more mystifying is that she keeps the same name the whole time. And lucky, I guess, because otherwise

Dear All, thanks a lot for all the quick and helpful responses! I'm currently interested in the "stance" of this community towards closed source contributions. The way I understand it, currently my options are quite limited: I would most likely need to use a remote procedure call API, and build one side of the API as GPL. But this would make the coupling much slower and more

Dear All, I've tried to build xapian-core 1.4.3 on MSYS2. It fails with attached error (undefined reference to `exp10'). I think it might be missing an explicit link to 'm'. I'm not able to fix this myself as I do not know autotools sufficiently well, but I hope you might be able to help. Cheers, Mario Emmenlauer -- BioDataAnalysis GmbH, Mario Emmenlauer Tel.

Dear All, I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-) I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get your feedback on a license question. My goal is to develop commercial software for image analysis of biomedical samples that may be used i.e. in academic institutions.

Hi, This topic has come up previously, across the R e-mail lists and the spammers need not be subscribers (but could be), but simply reasonably competent HTML scrapers. If you look at the online archives of the R lists, for example R-Devel for this month: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2016-December/thread.html>

Have others received spam messages after posting to this list? The two problem emails are HodgesDonna485 at yahoo.com and amykristen4003 at octbm.com. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On 25/01/2018 6:49 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 25 January 2018 at 06:20, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > | On 25/01/2018 2:57 AM, I?aki ?car wrote: > | > For what it's worth, this is my workflow: > | > > | > 1. Get a fork. > | > 2. From the master branch, create a new branch called fix-[something]. > | > 3. Put together the stuff there, commit, push and

Hi Duncan! I think there are many users whose first experiences with git where frustrating, and trust me, many people here can relate to your pain. I can certainly say that I can. At first, git makes significant effort to become fluent in seemingly "simple" tasks. I can literally feel your pain right now. But this is the main downside of git: that it can be hard to learn. I overcame

Dear Olly, thanks a lot for the pointer! I've fetched the patch you mention but actually it seems this is already included in the 1.4.3 release, is that possible? Also it did not solve the problem, I still get references to exp10. I've checked with nm and omenquire.o has undefined references to log10 and exp10. I went further and replaced exp10 in omenquire.cc with __builtin_exp10, but

My humble 2 nonlegal cents: There are multiple packages that make the link between R and proprietary software. One example is R2WinBUGS which connects to WinBUGS, but there are a lot more of these. All of these use essentially the same idea: - create the package under a standard GPL license - use the (command line) interface provided by the proprietary software to connect with it, eg by calls to

On 25.03.2017 14:29, Mario Emmenlauer wrote: > > Dear All, > > thanks a lot for all the quick and helpful responses! I'm currently > interested in the "stance" of this community towards closed source > contributions. The way I understand it, currently my options are quite > limited: I would most likely need to use a remote procedure call API, > and build one

The key difference being that while not under the GPL, highcharter is still open source. There isn't a single compiled library in the entire package. WinBUGS otoh is closed source (although there is an open source version of it, OpenBUGS). As far as I understood, CRAN doesn't accept packages containing any binary executable code without the proper source files attached. So including the

See inline... > On Mar 24, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Mario Emmenlauer <mario at emmenlauer.de> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > I've been following this mailing list for over three years now, but > its just now that I have realized that R is licensed under GPL! :-) > > I'm not a lawyer and I don't want lawyer advice, but I'd like to get > your feedback on

There are also packages like highcharter, which package proprietary software without a license, but it is incumbent on the user to respect the license of the underlying library. -----Original Message----- From: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Joris Meys Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:14 AM To: Marc Schwartz Cc: R-Devel Subject: Re: [Rd] non-infectious license for R

Hi list I just compiled 3.0rc1 on Solaris 9 (UltraSparc IIe) with gcc 3.3. Seems to work fine but I am surprised by the enormous size of the binaries: (ub-blade1):/usr/local/samba/sbin # ll total 232272 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44719632 Aug 28 15:07 nmbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 89726544 Aug 28 15:07 smbd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 44807356 Aug 28 15:07 swat -rwxr-xr-x

Xapian 1.4.4 can now be downloaded from: https://xapian.org/download The wiki has a summary of the most notable changes: https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/ReleaseOverview/1.4.4 A big thanks to the following people for helping to make this release a reality: Shivanshu Chauhan, Richard Boulton, Kirill A. Shutemov, David Bremner, James Aylett, Mario Emmenlauer, Daniel Schepler, James Clarke, Gaurav

John, I finally decided to go for it and kick off our NT-PDC (UB-SERVER). I want to transfer our domain (UB) to Samba 3.0.1 with OpenLDAP (2.1.23-1) as backend on Debian Woody (this machine's netbios-name in my test environment is UB-KIOSK). I read all documentation I could get a hold on and followed these procedures you suggested, but I am stuck... > * From: John H Terpstra >

Dear list, My apologies if a solution / explanation to this already exists on the list, but it is difficult to assign it to a certain keyword. test<-c(1:3) testfct <- function(x) {test[1]<-100} test [1] 1 2 3 testfct(1) [1] 1 2 3 Basically, I would like to write data into an external table that the function does not know. Why is this not working / what alternatives exist? Thanks,

hi, this may be trivial, but we can't seem to find anything adequate, (although there is a work around with match() ). We are looking for something along the lines of plot(table1[table1$var2==or("a","b","c","d"),"var1"]) would be handy, with the potential or() function leading to what plot(table1[table1$var2=="a" |