similar to: arguments to .Call(), .External should be read-only?

hi. i'm building a package using autotools. to propagate the package version number from configure.ac to DESCRIPTION, i'm using a DESCRIPTION.in file. both of these files are "shar"'d below. i need to distribute the DESCRIPTION.in file, as ./configure will need it. but, "R CMD check" wants to look at DESCRIPTION, so i've let that also come into the package

After I spend some time working with the function attribute* deduction pass** [1,3], I would like to propose a "proper" organization***. Why? Because we do not derive nearly as many attributes as we could****, while we do maintain various (separate and diffently organized) "data-flow-like analyses" to do so. What else? I propose a single optimistic data-flow

Chuck and Greg, Thanks a lot for your help! I have a much better understanding now of what is happening ?under the hood?. Kind Regards, Jason > On 31 May 2018, at 20:08, Greg Minshall <minshall at acm.org> wrote: > > Jason, > > as Chuck Berry (to whom, *thanks* for 'do {...} while(0)'!) suggested, > using grep, or even grep executed from find, such as >

hi. this is sort of a software methodology question. i'm working on developing a package (with C source code). developing it, i use autotools, git, make, and such like. as a result, there are random files in my source code directory that "R CMD check" would rather not see. some of these files (such as .git and friends) i could arrange to move to "just above" my

hi. i'm working on a package which only works if one (or both) of two libraries (Imlib2 and MagickWand) exist on the machine on which the package is compiled and executed. as currently written, the program purposely generates an error at *compile* time if neither library is available (thinking the earlier the user is notified, the less frustrating). is there a way of specifying this

hi. below is a small test case (hopefully minimal, though i'm still a bit confused about initializers). i would have guessed (and maybe i still would have been right) that one could re-use the name of a generic function for functions with different numbers of arguments. in the case below, class A's bB() queries the status of a single A object, so bB(A) (where here "A" is an

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:23:15PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > On 23.01.15 22:16, Ralph B?hme wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > >>> On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > >>>> I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are

Signed-off-by: Loiseleur Michel <mloiseleur at linagora.com> --- src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb b/src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb index da11bfa..79f29d2 100755 --- a/src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb +++ b/src/db-omatic/db_omatic.rb @@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ class DbOmatic < Qmf::ConsoleHandler end

Numbers -- thanks. Another clever trick. On 5/25/2018 11:54 AM, Greg Minshall wrote: > Evan, > > are you really looking at numbers, or just at character strings (that, > in your case, happen to be numbers)? if just characters, this rather > odd combination of strsplit() and Reduce() might do the trick: > ---- >> x <- '10110111' >> print(x) > [1]

Hi Arnaud, On Wed, 22 Mar 2017, Arnaud Quette wrote: > The technique is very general and is to send SIGUSR1/SIGUSR2 to the upsd daemon.? SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 are events just like ONBATT and ONLINE. > The patch runs successfully on my opensuse 13.2 box, and solves my problem. In upssched.conf I now have declarations such as > > ? ?AT SIGUSR1 * CANCEL-TIMER

Hi guys, I must be missing something obvious with pessimistic locking. Here is what I do (Rails 2.3, mySQL): In my Foo model: def test Foo.transaction do lock = UpdateLockForFoo.find_by_foo_id(self.id, :lock => true) sleep 30 end end For each Foo model, I have an UpdateLockForFoo. This "lock" needs to be acquired before doing any changes to Foo. I believe it works,

hi. i'd like to instantiate sed(1), send it some input, and retrieve its output, all via pipes (rather than an intermediate file). my sense from pipe and looking at the sources (sys-unix.c) is that is not possible. is that true? are there any thoughts of providing such a facility? cheers, Greg

Running with Samba 3.5.4, the Samba3x packages from CentOS 5.6 with added gpfs and tsmsm VFS modules against a GPFS 3.4.0.6 file system. Unix extensions are turned off because otherwise OS X 10.5 messes with group ownership and permissions and shares for "groups" don't work as required. Unfortunately being at a University I don't get to control the environment tightly, unless

Hi! Say we have a rails active-record-based model called "instance" which can have different states - STOPPED, RUNNING, STARTING_UP, SHUTTING_DOWN, etc... There is a method #start which changes the instance state to STARTING_UP only if it is STOPPED. def start if self.state == STOPPED self.state = STARTING_UP self.save ... end end As you understand if we have multiple

Hi everyone, I would like to know if there''s a way to synchronize the actions in a mongrel cluster. Basically, how do I make sure that a specific controller action gets executed by only one mongrel server at one time? I obviously cannot use Mutex::synchronize, because we''re talking about different processes. I looked into using optimistic and pessimistic locking. I

On 2018?05?16? 16:37, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in > packed ring. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

On 2018?05?16? 16:37, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in > packed ring. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c

On 2018?04?25? 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the > implementation in this patch may not work as expected, > and some further discussions on the implementation are > needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when > checking whether a kick is needed? > >

On 2018?04?25? 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the > implementation in this patch may not work as expected, > and some further discussions on the implementation are > needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when > checking whether a kick is needed? > >

On 2018?04?25? 13:15, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the event idx support in packed > ring. This feature is temporarily disabled, because the > implementation in this patch may not work as expected, > and some further discussions on the implementation are > needed, e.g. do we have to check the wrap counter when > checking whether a kick is needed? > >