similar to: Unfixed bugs in latest R-patched

I have released a new, faster, version of R, which I call pqR (for "pretty quick" R), based on R-2.15.0. Among many other improvements, pqR supports automatic use of multiple cores to perform numerical computations in parallel with other numerical computations, and with the interpretive thread. It also implements a true reference counting scheme to reduce the amount of unnecessary

In testing pqR on Solaris SPARC systems, I have found two bugs that are also present in recent R Core versions. You can see the bugs and fixes at the following URLs: https://github.com/radfordneal/pqR/commit/739a4960a4d8f3a3b20cfc311518369576689f37 https://github.com/radfordneal/pqR/commit/339b7286c7b43dcc6b00e51515772f1d7dce7858 The first bug, in nls, is most likely to occur on a 64-bit

Dmitriy Selivanov (selivanov.dmitriy at gmail.com) wrote: > Consider following example: > > a = matrix(1:2, nrow = 2, dimnames = list(c("row1", "row2"), c("col1"))) > a[1, ] > # 1 > > It returns *unnamed* vector `1` where I would expect named vector. In fact > it returns named vector when number of columns is > 1. > Same issue applicable

While doing some performance testing with the new version of pqR (see pqR-project.org), I've encountered an extreme, and quite unnecessary, inefficiency in the current R Core implementation of R, which I think you might want to correct. The inefficiency is in access to columns of a data frame, as in expressions such as df$col[i], which I think are very common (the alternatives of

> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 14:01 +0000, brodie gaslam via R-devel wrote: > > I'm thinking of this passage: > > > > > Logical values are sent as 0 (FALSE), 1 (TRUE) or INT_MIN = > > > -2147483648 (NA, but only if NAOK is true), and the compiled code > > > should return one of these three values. (Non-zero values other > > > than INT_MIN are

I think the discussion of this issue has gotten more complicated than necessary. First, there really is a bug. You can see this also by the fact that delayed warning messages are wrong. For instance, in R-3.1.2: > lapply(c(-1,2,-1),sqrt) [[1]] [1] NaN [[2]] [1] 1.414214 [[3]] [1] NaN Warning messages: 1: In FUN(c(-1, 2, -1)[[3L]], ...) : NaNs produced 2: In

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 07:52:56PM -0400, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 14/07/2015 6:08 PM, Radford Neal wrote: > > In testing pqR on Solaris SPARC systems, I have found two bugs that > > are also present in recent R Core versions. You can see the bugs and > > fixes at the following URLs: > > > >

> From: Philippe GROSJEAN <Philippe.GROSJEAN at umons.ac.be> > > ... for latest CRAN version, we have successfully installed 4999 > packages among the 5321 CRAN package on our platform. ... It is > strange that a large portion of R CMD check errors on CRAN occur and > disappear *without any version update* of a package or any of its > direct or indirect dependencies!

> ... with assignments inside of loops like this: > > reweight = function(iter, w, Q) { > for (i in 1:iter) { > wT = w * Q > } > } > ... before the RHS is executed, the LHS allocation would be added > to a small fixed length list of available space which is checked > before future allocations. If the same size is requested before the > next garbage

I've been getting pqR to work on windows systems, and in the process have discovered various problems with R core versions of R and with Rtools. One is with the implementation of OpenMP in 64-bit Rtools. This problem is in Rtools215 and Rtools33, and presumably all the ones in between. You can see the problem with the following test program: #include <stdio.h> #include <omp.h>

41;309;0c> Why does debug() enter Browse[3] here at all, and why does it happen the > first time and not the second? This seems unexpected to me, and has > undesirable effects for ESS users (that I reported here - > https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/ess-help/2013-June/009154.html - but just > realized my post to r-devel didn't make it through when I tried to report > it back

> > The behaviour of a[1,] is unchanged, for backwards compatibility > > reasons. But in pqR one can explicitly mark an argument as > > missing using "_". When an array subscript is missing in this way, > > the names will not be dropped in this context even if there is > > only one of them. So a[1,_] will do what you want: > > > > > a =

On Wed, 18 Feb 2015, Nathan Kurz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Radford Neal <radford at cs.toronto.edu> wrote: >>> ... with assignments inside of loops like this: >>> >>> reweight = function(iter, w, Q) { >>> for (i in 1:iter) { >>> wT = w * Q >>> } >>> } >>> ... before the RHS is executed, the

Hello, All: I have for years copied an address like "C:\Program Files\R\R-2.15.0\library\MASS\scripts" from Windows Explorer into R, then manually replaced "\" with "/". I have a function to automate this added to the development version of "sos". However, it generates a warning in "R CMD check" ("parse error: unexpected

Dear R forum I have a data.frame as cashflow_df = data.frame(instrument = c("ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC","ABC", "ABC", "PQR", "PQR",

Dear R helpers   After executing the R code, where the last few lines of the code are something like given below.     ## Part of my R code     n = 20   ........ .........   final_output = data.frame(Numbers = numbers, ABC = data1, XYZ = data2, PQR = data3)           write.csv(data.frame(Scenario = paste("Sc_", 1:n, sep = ""), final_output'), 'result.csv', row.names

Dear R helpers   I have some variables say ABC, DEF, PQR, LMN and XYZ. I am choosing any three varaibles at random at a time for my analysis and name these files as input1.csv, input2.csv and input3.csv. So if I choose variables say ABC, DEF and PQR, I am passing the specifications of these variables to input1.csv, input2.csv and input3.csv respectively.   This means in another case even if I

Dear R Forum, I have a data.frame as df = data.frame(date = c("2013-04-15", "2013-04-14", "2013-04-13", "2013-04-12", "2013-04-11"), ABC_f = c(62.80739769,81.04525895,84.65712455,12.78237251,57.61345256), LMN_d = c(21.16794336,54.6580401,63.8923307,87.59880367,87.07693716), XYZ_p = c(55.8885464,94.1358684,84.0089114,98.99746696,64.71083712),

I am trying to write a program that uses R and takes a pdb file, and converts it to a pqr file. This task is simple generally, using the website, http://pdb2pqr-1.wustl.edu/pdb2pqr/. How do you use R to input a pdb file (that is on hand) into the upload pdb file input, and run the website and give the return file to be a pqr file. Thanks for your help. -- View this message in context:

Hi, I am new in R, i have a matrix like this MyMatrix <- *ABC PQR XYZ* 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 And, i have an array containing some conditions like this, MyArray <- c("*ABC*>50","*PQR*<50","*ABC*<30 &* XYZ*<40") "ABC>50" "PQR<50" "ABC<30 & XYZ<40"