similar to: do.call Error for Function Not Present When Manually Called

When creating an Ajax.Request(''/path.xml'') i don''t get responseXML. I''m confused what I am doing wrong. If i change the response variable and dump responseText, it shows the file, it just doesn''t recognize it as xml. function xml(url){ new Ajax.Request(url, { method: ''post'', parameters:''resultSet=simcall'',

The documentation states that "save.image() is just a short-cut for save(list = ls(all = TRUE), file = ".RData")". However, if I do Browse[1]> ls(all=TRUE) [1] "expression" "orderedFeatures" "predictParams" [4] "resubstituteParams" "trainParams" "verbose" Browse[1]>

I wanted to start making some change. But I thought and I don't understand why it's necessary to add @. // RUN: FileCheck %s // CHECK-DEFINE-PATERN: register(n): {{[a-z]+}}n // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] // CHECK: %[[register("1")]] // CHECK-SAME: %[[register("2")]] This example will be equivalent to // RUN:

Yes, I now understand what you suggested. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: car(make, model, year): {{Found a }} make model {{, from }} year But I think that in pattern I should show that I use parameter. I thought that patterns can also be simple strings. All strings should be regexs in pattern and parameters can't be used in pattern in your example. But I want to use parameters in regexs. For

Ok, when I change syntax I will load new patch. Thanks, Elena. -----Original Message----- From: vsk at apple.com [mailto:vsk at apple.com] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 9:38 PM To: Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> Cc: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: FileCheck Enhancements It is necessary to be

Hi, I am writing C++ functions that are to be called via .Call() interface. I'd been using error() (from R.h) to return to R if there is an error, but then I realized that this might be not safe as supposedly error() doesn't throw an exception and therefore some destructors do not get called and some memory may leak. Here is a simple example extern "C" void foo() { string

Right now I am trying to capture the function name and the number of arguments , so this following is the pass I wrote . ------------------------------------------------------------- struct pass06a : public ModulePass { virtual bool runOnModule(Module &M) { std::vector<const Type*> pList; pList.push_back( PointerType::get(Type::SByteTy) ); pList.push_back(

> On Aug 24, 2016, at 4:46 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 24, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Elena Lepilkina <Elena.Lepilkina at synopsys.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I

Hi, I have question again about modifiers for pattern parameters. Vedant suggested such way. > CHECK-DEFINE-PATTERN: one_or_more(x): x {{+}} But I have some doubts. This should be equal to x+. This approach differs from standard one. In FileCheck I can write CHECK: {{x|y}}{{something}} This line will be equal to regex (x|y)(something). But if I use suggested approach and write same

HI , I understand that the standard C library functions are executed using the native library of the host machine. ( for example when we execute a bytecode to extract the profile info ) Is it possible to extract for each standard library function that is executed , the arguments that the function is called with. For example if printf ("%d", some_int ) when called during runtime

Hi all, Some discussions and comments were made in reviews. Much time has already passed since last comment and uploading changed patches. I made small summary report about features here, because there are some doubts about syntax of some features and changes in patches and it'll be great to know more opinions. 1. FileCheck Enhancement - CHECK-WORD (https://reviews.llvm.org/D22353) I replace

Is there anyway I can convert a vectors objectname to a string to be used in fx: Monkey<-c(0,0,0,1,1,1) Wax<-c(1,0,1,0,1,0) f<-function(x,y){ table(x,y) } f(Monkey,Wax) so that the printout is not y x 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 but Wax Monkey 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 1 -- View this message in context:

R2.1.1 Win 2k I have a function, B, within a function, A. I would like to have B print the name of the argument passed to it (not the value of the arguments). i.e., A<-function() { B<-function(x,y) { fit1<-lm(y~x,data=jo) print(summary(fit1) I want B to print the string "age" and the string "height". } B(age,height) }

I have sort of an emergency question for the list. One of my professors for an S-Plus intensive class distributed a function to produce partial regression plots. I need to run it under R, because I'm doing the homework on my home computer with a modem; hence I don't have the speed required to emulate X-Windows and run S Plus off one of the campus servers. Bottom line: I'm using R.

Over the years there have been inquiries to these lists as to how to produce plots with the direction(s) of axes reversed. In response to some of these inquiries, I have provided a function call ``rplot'' which automated the procedure for such axis reversal. Recently Herberto Ghezzo of McGill University pointed out to me that there was a bug in my code. I have now fixed this bug (and a

To the purpose of fitting a 2nd order polynomial (a + b*x + c*x^2) to the chunk of signal falling in a 17 consecutive samples window I wrote the following very crude script. Since I have no previous experience of using Least Square Fit with R I would appreciate your supervision and suggestion. I guess the returned coefficients of the oolynomial are: a = -1.3191398 b = 0.1233055 c = 0.9297401

Greetings, I am running a factor analysis model in rjags and have received the following error Error parsing model file: syntax error on line 5 near "" Line 5 is model { Here is my syntax. Any insight would be greatly appreciated. require(rjags) modelstring = " model { for (i in 1 : nData) { for (j in 1 : nIndicators) { y[i,j] ~ dnorm(mu[i,j],psi[j]) ephat[i,j] <-