similar to: Questions on extending Rcpp wrap and as with templates

With primitive types, I can interchange literal usage and type aliases in IR: %mytype = type i32 define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store i32 *%t1*, *i32** %ptr ret void } But for structs, I cannot: %mytype = type { i32, i32 } define void @foo(%mytype* %ptr) { %t1 = load *%mytype** %ptr store* { i32, i32 }* %t1, *{ i32, i32 }** %ptr ret void }

Hello, I'm trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM's default behavior is to pass structures by reference. I'm not disputing the benefits of this but I really want to change the default behavior for experimentation purposes. To this end I've changed the code in DefaultABIInfo::classifyArgumentType() to

Justin, http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#structure-type "Identified types can be recursive, can be opaqued, and are never uniqued." Do you think it would be less descriptive? "Identified type, aka named llvm::StructType, is never uniqued against other identified types nor literal types, aka unnamed StructType(s)." ? See also;

Dear R users, Suppose I have the following data.frame: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 a Single 10 11 12 b Single 15 25 35 c Double 22 33 44 d Double 4 6 8 and I want to have new records: myID myType myNum1 myNum2 myNum3 e Single 12.5 18

Dear R-users, I am trying to use the grep function to test whether a particular string is of the form "n.../mydir/myfile.mytype.myext". Anything between n and mytype could vary, and anything after mytype could vary. I tried to proceed by steps to build my regular expression... but I do not really understand why the last call of the following code do not work. Any help would be

Hi, On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Martinez, Javier E < javier.e.martinez at intel.com> wrote: > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I’m trying to change the default behavior for how structures are passed to > functions to use pass-by-value. Currently LLVM’s default behavior is to > pass structures by reference. I’m not disputing the benefits of this but I > really want to

Hi, Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was trying to say: On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> +1 Exactly this. >> I don't think C programmer will not understand using. The "=" makes it much >> simpler to read, even if it is the first time you see it, which is not the >>

I am new to Rails and Ruby, and to OO languages, and seem to be making a very silly mistake somewhere here. Can anybody help? I am trying to write an application which involves ''exercises'', each of which consists of several ''templates''. This is based on MySQL tables with these names. I have models and controllers, built with the Rails Scaffold, for both

Hi all, I''m struggling with the following: I have a defined type wrapped in a class: class myclass { define mytype(bla) { file { "blabla": .... } exec { "blablabla": ... } } } And I access the defined type in my other class by doing this: class otherclass { include myclass myclass::mytype { "alb": ... } # and here I want to

2017-01-10 0:06 GMT+01:00 David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>: > > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:59 PM Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sorry I fat fingered an earlier send in the previous email. I was >> trying to say: >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Sanjoy Das >> <sanjoy at

Hi, trying to develop this idea of splitting c++ classes into real interface and implementation and to make a std isocpp proposal out of it. Need some help and info to make the proposal cover as many details as possible. The idea is to split the class declaration into a part that will stay in the header and will contain only the public members. (let's ignore protected for the moment). The

2017-01-09 19:25 GMT+01:00 Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com>: > > On Jan 9, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Piotr Padlewski via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> 2017-01-09 16:15 GMT+01:00 Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>:

Is there any API in LLVM that can represent the field in java. such as the instucion "iget vx, vy, field_id" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130716/81e59a4a/attachment.html>

Let''s start with this: class whatever ( $myType=''other'' ) { file { "some-config-file": ... content => $myType ? { ''this'' => template("whatever/this.erb"), ''that'' => template("whatever/that.erb"), ''other'' =>

On 4 Jun 2020, at 0:54, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > While MLIR may be one part of the solution, I think it's also the case > that > the function-ABI interface between Clang and LLVM is just wrong and > should > be fixed -- independently of whether Clang might use MLIR in the > future. > > I've mentioned this idea before, I think, but never got around to

Hi, I'm having a play with LLVM to implement a custom language (for my intellectual curiosity only). I'm wondering how, when using IRBuilder, one can can it to emit a recursive type definition? The code for TypeBuilder explicitly states that it doesn't handle recursive types... I'm after being able to emit, programmatically, stuff like the Named Types example in the Language

Hello. I have an .bc, which defines @foo(%type* arg1, %type* arg2, %type* arg3). Firstly, i do this: runtimeModule = getLazyIRFileModule("runtime.bc", smd, llctx); then this: fooFunction = runtimeModule->getFunction("foo"); myType = runtimeModule->getTypeByName("type"); After that, i'm creating another module: myModule = new Module("My

still pretty new to Ruby, please bare with me :) Say I have a module with a custom type, structured like so: [modules]/mymodule/manifests/init.pp [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/provider/mytype/foo.rb [modules]/mymodule/lib/puppet/type/mytype.rb In foo.rb, I''d like to call some custom ruby functions in a module and/ or class. These are generic functions that may be used in other modules,

I have a packed struct <{<3 x i32>, i32}> type that LLVM determines to be 20 bytes. Is this the expected size for this type? I wrote a small example to illustrate: ; ModuleID = 'myexample.bc' target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128" target triple =

I just upgraded to puppet 0.20.1 from 0.18.4 (both using the debian packages). After the upgrade, I''m getting the following error: err: Could not find type "remotefile" in file /etc/puppet/manifests/classes/kerberos.pp at line 47 Here''s the where the error is occuring: service { nfs-common: ensure => running, hasstatus => true, subscribe