similar to: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2500 Bug ID: 2500 Summary: ConnectionAttempts=0 causes ssh to output uninitialised data on stdout Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.1p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ssh

Hi, My Server runs on Ubuntu Server 12.04 LTS 32 bits. I'm getting the following error messages when I run "make check" during the compilation of dovecot-2.2.13. <snip> ==2058== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==2058==??? at 0x4049DD8: inflateReset2 (in /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1.2.3.4) ==2058==??? by 0x4049EC7: inflateInit2_ (in

Hi, Ralph recently checked in a version of theora/tests/noop.c that uses the new API. Part of the reason for this test is to check for memory leaks in the library's constructors and destructors. You can run the test suite under valgrind by configuring with --enable-valgrind-testing. The test passes, but gives output like: make[1]: Entering directory

Hello, I am currently using Dovecot 2.2.10 on Fedora 16 - 64 bit system I had made v2.2.10 Fedora 16 rpm file using spec file from ATrpms. http://dl.atrpms.net/all/dovecot.spec It has been working well from 6 months or so. Today I tried to make v2.2.15 rpm using same spec file. But "make check" is giving following error: fatal_printf_format_fix

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Timo, Dovecot 2.2.6 compiled on Ubuntu 10.04 fails on "make check" with the following errors. "make install" is finishing just fine and Dovecot itself works flawlessly so far. - ----- 8< ----- http header invalid [0]: parse failure ............................... : ok: Expected ':' after header field name

Hi. I''m having problems with a class constant I''ve defined as follows: class Customer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :orders TITLES = [''Mr'', ''Ms'', ''Miss'', ''Mrs''] end Whenever I try and access this constant using Customer::TITLES, I get an unitialized constant Customer::TITLES error. Is my syntax

Known issues before merge: - Currently requires acpi_backlight=vendor kernel param - 0x5e always valid? Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at student.tudelft.nl> Tested-by: Rick Hendricksen --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_backlight.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 4 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.h | 7 +++++++ 3 files

llvm-gcc is producing segmentation fault when running with -emit-llvm. Running cc1 in valgind produces the warning: ==12768== at 0x8D042C: llvm::llvm_ostream& llvm::llvm_ostream::operator<< <llvm::Module>(llvm::Module const&) (Streams.h:41) ==12768== by 0x8D0464: llvm::PrintModulePass::runOnModule(llvm::Module&) (PrintModulePass.h:41) ==12768== by 0xED6EB9:

On 2020/8/7 ??2:56, Alex Dewar wrote: > If the kernel is unable to allocate memory for the variable dmr then > err will be returned without being set. Set err to -ENOMEM in this > case. > > Fixes: 94abbccdf291 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code") > Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized variables") > Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <alex.dewar at

On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote: > __strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so) Is it possible that you are encountering this issue? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925 Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc implementation (if it is not the valgrind bug). If possible, upgrade your valgrind, libc etc. br, Teemu Huovila

On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: > On 11/30/2014 05:53 AM, AMM wrote: >> __strspn_sse42 (in /lib64/libc-2.14.90.so) > Is it possible that you are encountering this issue? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=270925 > Either way, the error seems to stem from your libc implementation (if it is not the valgrind bug). > > If possible, upgrade your

On 12/01/2014 12:41 PM, AMM wrote: > > On Monday 01 December 2014 03:41 PM, Teemu Huovila wrote: > But Dovecot 2.2.10 (and earlier versions) were not throwing this error. This test was added in Dovecot version 2.2.14. It is also the only reference to strspn() in the whole project. > Can I can ignore it by NOT doing "make check"? I would say you can safely ignore it, but I

Hi, I get an "Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)" from valgrind when using 'solve' in combination with some simple C-code. (I did not use other functions of R besides 'solve'.) In detail: running R --vanilla -d "valgrind --tool=memcheck --memcheck:leak-check=yes --num-callers=20 " and calling .Call("XXX") nd <- 3

In my worker class, when i try to start the worker thread, it throws the error: uninitialized constant LoginEngine - (NameError) /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:123:in `const_missing'' /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.1/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:131:in `const_missing''

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112201 Bug ID: 112201 Summary: Syscall param ioctl(generic) points to uninitialised byte(s) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: not set Priority: not set

I spent some time digging into a Valgrind report of uninitialized values in LLVM r287520 built using itself. (One of quite a few such reports that comes up during a "make check".) I could use another set of eyes on the issue if someone has time. This command gives me an error: valgrind -q ./bin/llc < /home/regehr/llvm/test/CodeGen/Hexagon/hwloop-dbg.ll -march=hexagon

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com> # Date 1304937815 -3600 # Node ID 35abcbcdf8bcabab6e0bbd929f69b613e167edfd # Parent 4b0692880dfa557d4e1537c7a58c412c1286a416 xen: ioapic: avoid gcc 4.6 warnings about uninitialised variables gcc 4.6 complains: io_apic.c: In function 'restore_IO_APIC_setup':

# HG changeset patch # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell at citrix.com> # Date 1304937815 -3600 # Node ID 35abcbcdf8bcabab6e0bbd929f69b613e167edfd # Parent 4b0692880dfa557d4e1537c7a58c412c1286a416 xen: ioapic: avoid gcc 4.6 warnings about uninitialised variables gcc 4.6 complains: io_apic.c: In function 'restore_IO_APIC_setup':

Just want to emphasize that on x86-64 and using Valgrind: LLVM compiled with LLVM gets 360 unexpected test fails LLVM compiled with GCC gets 22 unexpected test fails Of course I don't know how many of these are caused by this bitfield speculation issue. John On 11/21/2016 10:48 PM, regehr via llvm-dev wrote: > Alright, here's what seems to be happening... > > The testcase

Hello, first off, thanks for all of the previous help; hopefully someone will have some insight on this question. I am attempting to track down a segmentation fault which occurs only after a detach(2) is called in the code (I have replaced the detach(2) with detach(package:DSA) and that fails as well (furthermore, I have removed the detach calls and it does not segfault)). It has proved