similar to: Sweave provides a misleading error when vignette engine not fully specified

Hi, Recently I saw a couple of cases in which the package vignettes were somewhat complicated so that Stangle() (or knitr::purl() or other tangling functions) can fail to produce the exact R code that is executed by the weaving function Sweave() (or knitr::knit(), ...). For example, this is a valid document that can pass the weaving process but cannot generate a valid R script to be source()d:

A package uses VignetteEngine: knitr; the package itself does not Suggests: knitr, but it Suggests: BiocStyle which in turn Suggests: knitr. Nonetheless, R CMD check fails indicating that a package required for checking is not declared. Is it really the intention that the original package duplicate Suggests: knitr? This is only with a recent R. In detail, with $ Rdev --version|head -3 R Under

As a user, I am always annoyed beyond measure that Sweave vignettes precede the code by a command line prompt. It makes running examples by simple copying of the commands from the vignette to the console a pain. I know the idea is that it is clear what is the command, and what is the output, but I'd rather precede the output with some kind of marking. Is there any other solution possible /

I?m preparing a package (fastR) for submission to CRAN, but the vignette index keeps going AWOL, or at least R CMD check ?as-cran thinks so. I?ve tried several things and gave myself the weekend to think of other things, but I can?t figure it out. Perhaps someone on the list can lend a hand. Here?s one example situation, where I build the index.html file myself and put it in inst/doc/index.html

Now that R 3.0.0+ supports non-Sweave vignettes, R-exts \S 1.4.2 seems to imply that it is possible to include both Sweave and knitr vignettes in a single package. I'm wondering if anyone has tried this and/or if there are some hidden gotchas putting this into practice, and concerned about creating problems with CRAN checks if I try this. Consider two vignettes: pkg/vignettes/vign1.Rnw,

Dear all, I'm trying to use a Markdown vignette with UTF-8 encoding. It compiles well when knitting the vignette in RStudio, but it fails to recognize the UTF-8 settings when building the source package. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong? I tried to put the relevant information below. Best regards, Thierry Details: Using 64-bit R 3.1.2 with encoding = "native.enc"

Dear Duncan, The UTF-8 characters aren't properly rendered in the pdf version of the vignette. $?? ????? ?????? ?????? ????? ?? ?? is rendered as $????? ?????????? ???????????? ????? ?????? ? ???????? ???????? The same problem occurs when I use render("vignette.md", output_format = "mypackage::mystyle"), instead of render("vignette.md", output_format =

I haven't figured it out entirely, but it looks like there are a couple of small glitches with knitr-based vignettes and SweaveParseOptions. I posted the tarball of a package with a knitr vignette with (as far as I can tell) everything properly coded in the DESCRIPTION file (VignetteBuilder: knitr, Suggests: knitr) and the vignette itself (%\VignetteEngine{knitr::knitr}). When Windows

Hi, as far as I understand it, the new R devel feature of processing non-Sweave vignettes will (a) locate any "[.][RrSs](nw|tex)$" or ".Rmd" files, (b) check for a registered vignette engine, (c) process the file using the registered "weave" function, (d) and possibly post process the generated weave artifact (e.g. a *.tex file). I'd like to propose to extend

Full_Name: Kevin Coombes Version: 2.4.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (143.111.22.24) I'm running R 2.4.0 on a Windows XP machine, with only the default packages loaded. Running Sweave or Stangle on the following Rnw file: -------------- % bug.Rnw \begin{document} Demonstrate an Sweave/Stangle bug. <<info>>= sessionInfo() @ <<getFDR>>= x <- 1 @

A few things to clarify: 1. You do not necessarily have to keep the \usepackage{} line if you use %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8}, because Pandoc will use UTF-8 anyway in its LaTeX template. 2. Perhaps the vignette engine in R has done something clever to convert utf8 to UTF-8, but I'd recommend %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} instead of %\VignetteEncoding{utf8} to make sure it is a valid encoding name,

How exactly should I go about turning off annotation when running Stangle (Rtangle) with "R CMD Stangle myfile.Rnw"? Ideally I would like to be able to turn annotation off and on for individual code chunks, or maybe better, to annotate only named chunks. Are either of these things easily done? Is there some way to figure out this sort of thing without reading through the source code

In Section 1.4.2 of "Writing R Extensions" %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knitr} should be %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knit} > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit) Is this sort of thing best reported here, or is a huge report in order? John Maindonald email: john.maindonald at anu.edu.au phone : +61 2 (6125)3473 fax

> -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [R] How to extract R codes that embedded in a HTML file > using Stangle? > Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 17:01:30 +0000 > From: Tao Shi <shitao at hotmail.com> > To: ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de, lecoutre at stat.ucl.ac.be > CC: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch > : <jmcconnell at

Hi, I have a problem using figures in Sweave: To save my figures, I use \SweaveOpts{prefix.string=figures/figure} I adjust the figure size for my pdf document using <<graphicsFun, fig=TRUE, echo=FALSE, height=10, width=5, eval=TRUE>>= this works fine. The file figures/figure-graphicsFun.pdf has the right size, and so has the figure in the final pdf document. The problem is,

[I originally emailed this to Friedrich Leisch but got no response and I just wanted to make sure it made it in before release.] While working with Stangle(), I noticed a problem when using 'split = TRUE'. Particularly, when there are two chunks where one chunk's name is a prefix of another chunk's name, then the two chunks will be written to a single file rather than two

Hi, I'm using the Sweave and I would like include codes of the R in my LaTeX file. I extracts the R code with Stangle (), whose name is Relatorio.R but I can't include it in the Latex file as an appendix. Suggests? Thanks, -------------------------------------- Silvano Cesar da Costa Departamento de Estat?stica Universidade Estadual de Londrina Fone: 3371-4346

I need some help understanding a problem running the tests on the 'digest' package. Initially, I got the message that the 'knitr' package was needed to run vignettes: Running vignettes for package ?digest? Error in loadVignetteBuilder(vigns$pkgdir) : vignette builder 'knitr' not found So I installed the knitr package and all its dependents (?mime?, ?stringi?,

On 5/3/16 11:29 AM, Thierry Onkelinx wrote: > Dear Mick, > > Note that both knitr and rmarkdown are listed under Suggests: both are > required to compile the vignette. Installing rmarkdown should solve > the problem. If not, please provide more information. OS, R version, > digest version, ... > > This is occurring in the context of an automated testing environment that

Dear list, we have a markdown vignette for our package in vignette/vignette.md This is not visible from within R with the vignette(package = "mypackage") command. I assume the reason is that the vignette function only shows PDF vignettes. Is there any way to circumvent this and display markdown vignettes directly from within R? I tried to seek the answer from R archives and search