similar to: C headers

Hi Mark, Uhm... sometimes this is not always possible. For example I have a package QCA which produces truth tables (all combinations of presence / absence of causal conditions), and it uses the venn package to draw a Venn diagram. It is debatable if one should assimilate the "venn" package into the QCA package (other people might want Venn diagrams but not necessarily the other QCA

A third possibility, which I use in my gtools and gdata packages, is to use soft-links to create a copy of the relevant functions from one package in the other. I make sure these functions are *not* exported, so no conflicts are created, and the use of soft-links mean the code never gets out of sync. -Greg -- Change your thoughts and you change the world. --Dr. Norman Vincent Peale > On

I am trying to submit a package on CRAN, and everything passes ok on all platforms but Debian, where CRAN responds with an automatic "significant" warning: * checking whether package ?QCA? can be installed ... [35s/35s] WARNING Found the following significant warnings: /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:106:10: warning: ?__builtin_strncpy? output may be truncated

Thanks all, I don't know either (for the moment). It's all in the design phase still. Generally, I would also like to keep specific functions in specific packages, if at all possible. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Mark van der Loo <mark.vanderloo at gmail.com> wrote: > Well, I'm not saying that Dmitri _should_ do it. I merely mention it as an > option that I think is

Dear r-devel, I am trying to automatically check if two successive versions of a package have the same results (i.e. code not broken), by parsing the example sections for each function against a previously tested version. While trying to replicate the code from example(), I am facing an error related with te "index.search" function (line 7 in the example() code). This is the code I am

On Oct 5, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 05.10.2015 23:47, Andrew Robinson wrote: >> As a fourth option, I wonder if the first author could fork the package? >> >> Presumably, appropriately cited, a fork is permitted by the license under >> which it was released. Then the original package, by both

Does anybody know of aything that will help me do Quantitiative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and/or Fuzzy set analysis?? Or failing that Quine? ta rg Prof R Gott Durham Univesrity UK

Dear R-help list, Part of a program I wrote seem to take a significant amount of time, therefore I am looking for an alternative approach. In order to explain what is does: - the input is a sorted vector of integer numbers - some higher numbers may be derived (using a mathematical formula) from lower numbers, therefore they should be eliminated - at the end, the vector should contain only

Using => and <= instead of -> and <- would make things easier, although the precedence would be different. Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:43 AM Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for your replies, this actually has little to do with the > regular R code but more to signal what in my package QCA is referred

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > [...] > Is that so? Not according to my reading of the 'Writing R > Extensions' manual, nor according to what I have been doing in > all of my packages for ca. 2 years: > > The rule I have in my mind is > > 1) NAMESPACE Import(s|From) \ >

Dear Adrian Dusa, others, I've recently started to learn R in order to use the QCA package because i think it might offer what other QCA packages don't: possibilities for quite a few conditions and large n. However, can someone tell me approx. how much RAM i need to run QCA on set of +/- 400.000 cases and +/- 15 conditions? (or differently: how much time will it take with RAM of a

Dear list, I have a vector of numbers, let's say: myvec <- c(2, 8, 24, 26, 51, 57, 58, 78, 219) My task is to reduce this vector to non-reducible numbers; small numbers can cross-out some of the larger ones, based on a function let's say called reduce() If I apply the function to the first element 2, my vector gets shorted to: > (myvec <- reduce(myvec[1])) [1] 2 24 51

Mehdi, I am looking for an understanding of 1) IPRA in general, 2) IPRA in LLVM. Whether I want to use LTO or not is a separate issue. 1) I currently believe it is a true statement that: If all external functions are known to not call back into the “whole-program” Being compiled, then IPRA is free to do anything at all to the functions being

Adrian, I am not on the CRAN or R-core teams, so the following is my own view, but... > library(QCA) > > Users are encouraged to cite this package as: > > Dusa, Adrian (2015). QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Package > Version 1.2-0, > URL: http://cran.r-project.org/package=QCA > > This is just an encouragement, not a requirement, and the official citation

Daniel, My point is this, If (cond) ---- optimizer takes advantage of knowing cond == true within the “then” part Assert(cond) ---- optimizer takes advantage of knowing cond == true for the rest of the scope Assume(cond) ---- optimizer takes advantage of knowing cond == true for the rest of the scope If we aren’t implementing these in a consistent manner (like using an intrinsic for

Hi, Field RdMacros was introduced in file DESCRIPTION to allow users to import LaTeX-like macros from other packages. Currently 'R CMD Check --as-cran' gives a NOTE: > Unknown, possibly mis-spelled, field in DESCRIPTION: > ?RdMacros? A small package demonstrating this is available at http://www.maths.manchester.ac.uk/~gb/testRdMacro_0.0.2.tar.gz (and this is the source:

Mehdi, I’m seeing lots of “upgrading” logic, If (UseIPRA) createPass(new DummyCGSCCPass); if (UseIPRA) addPass(createRegUsageInfoPropPass()); if (UseIPRA) addPass(createRegUsageInfoCollector()); ??? --Peter. From: mehdi.amini at

On 23/05/2020 07:38, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Adrian, > > newer compilers are better at finding bugs - you may want to read the full trace of the error, it tells you that you likely have a memory overflow when using strncpy() in your package. You should check whether it is right. Unfortunately we can?t help you more specifically, because I don't see any link to what you submitted so

Adrian, Indeed, this has come up in a few places, but as Gabor says, there is no such thing as right hand assignment at any point after parsing is complete. This means the only feasible way to detect it, which a few projects do I believe, is process the code while it is still raw text, before it goes into the parser, and have clever enough regular expressions. The next question, then, is why

Vivek, Here’s the way I see it, let me know if you agree or disagree, You cannot optimize a function’s calling convention (register-usage) unless You can see and change every caller, and you only know this for non-static functions if you know that all calls to external functions cannot call back into the current compilation unit. #1 gives you the info necessary to change the call-site