similar to: geo-replication status faulty

Hi, Have problems with geo replication on glusterfs 3.12.6 / Ubuntu 16.04. I can see a ?master volinfo unavailable? in master logfile. Any ideas? Master: Status of volume: testtomcat Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Brick gfstest07:/gfs/testtomcat/mount 49153 0

Hi, I have a Glusterfs (v3.11.2-1) geo replication master-slave setup between two sites. The idea is to provide an off-site backup for my storage. When I start the session, I get the following message: [2017-08-15 20:07:41.110635] E [fuse-bridge.c:3484:fuse_xattr_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: extended attribute not supported by the backend storage Then it starts syncing the data but it stops at the

Hi, I have a Glusterfs (v3.11.2-1) geo replication master-slave setup between two sites. The idea is to provide an off-site backup for my storage. When I start the session, I get the following message: [2017-08-15 20:07:41.110635] E [fuse-bridge.c:3484:fuse_xattr_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse: extended attribute not supported by the backend storage Then it starts syncing the data but it stops at the

Hi Kotresh, Yes, all nodes have the same version 4.1.1 both master and slave. All glusterd are crashing on the master side. Will send logs tonight. Thanks, Marcus ################ Marcus Peders?n Systemadministrator Interbull Centre ################ Sent from my phone ################ Den 13 juli 2018 11:28 skrev Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar <khiremat at redhat.com>: Hi Marcus, Is the

Hi All, I have run the following commands on master3, and that has added master3 to geo-replication. gluster system:: execute gsec_create gluster volume geo-replication tier1data drtier1data::drtier1data create push-pem force gluster volume geo-replication tier1data drtier1data::drtier1data stop gluster volume geo-replication tier1data drtier1data::drtier1data start Now I am able to start the

Hi Anant, i would first start checking if you can do ssh from all masters to the slave node.If you haven't setup a dedicated user for the session, then gluster is using root. Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ? ?????, 26 ?????? 2024 ?. ? 18:07:59 ?. ???????+2, Anant Saraswat <anant.saraswat at techblue.co.uk> ??????: Hi All, I have run the following commands on master3,

Don't forget to test with the georep key. I think it was /var/lib/glusterd/geo-replication/secret.pem Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov ? ??????, 27 ?????? 2024 ?. ? 07:24:07 ?. ???????+2, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> ??????: Hi Anant, i would first start checking if you can do ssh from all masters to the slave node.If you haven't setup a dedicated user for the

Hi There, We have a Gluster setup with three master nodes in replicated mode and one slave node with geo-replication. # gluster volume info Volume Name: tier1data Type: Replicate Volume ID: 93c45c14-f700-4d50-962b-7653be471e27 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 1 x 3 = 3 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: master1:/opt/tier1data2019/brick Brick2: master2:/opt/tier1data2019/brick

hi, I've some issue with geo-replication (since 3.2.0) and nfs auth (since initial release). Geo-replication --------------- System : Debian 6.0 amd64 Glusterfs: 3.2.0 MASTER (volume) => SLAVE (directory) For some volume it works, but for others i can't enable geo-replication and have this error with a faulty status: 2011-05-03 09:57:40.315774] E

Thanks Guus I have one more question. - We see several log messages that we dont currently understand - Can you comment on what they mean and if they are concerning? I've obfuscated IP's and node names so please ignore those. Our tinc daemon command is: tincd -n <vpn name> -- Received short packet -- Got REQ_KEY from node003 while we already started a SPTPS session! -- Invalid

Hello, in regard to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434066 i have been faced to another issue when using the trashcan feature on a dist. repl. volume running a geo-replication. (gfs 3.12.6 on ubuntu 16.04.4) for e.g. removing an entire directory with subfolders : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1/b1$ rm -rf * afterwards listing files in the trashcan : tron at gl-node1:/myvol-1/test1$

Hi Dietmar, I am trying to understand the problem and have few questions. 1. Is trashcan enabled only on master volume? 2. Does the 'rm -rf' done on master volume synced to slave ? 3. If trashcan is disabled, the issue goes away? The geo-rep error just says the it failed to create the directory "Oracle_VM_VirtualBox_Extension" on slave. Usually this would be because of gfid

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >

Hi all. I'm looking to see if anyone can tell me this is already working for them or if they wouldn't mind performing a quick test. I'm trying to set up a geo-replication instance on 3.2.5 from a local volume to a remote directory. This is the command I am using: gluster volume geo-replication myvol ssh://root at remoteip:/data/path start I am able to perform a geo-replication

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > > wide quorum: > > Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of > alternating outages. Thanks! > >

Hello Gluster users, Before I put Gluster into production, I am wondering how it determines whether a byte can be written, and where I should look in the source code to change these behaviors. My experiences are with glusterfs 3.2.4 on CentOS 6 64-bit. Suppose I have a Gluster volume made up of four 1 MB bricks, like this Volume Name: test Type: Distributed-Replicate Status: Started Number of

Well, it looks like I've stumped the list, so I did a bit of additional digging myself: azathoth replicates with yog-sothoth, so I compared their brick directories. `ls -R /var/local/brick0/data | md5sum` gives the same result on both servers, so the filenames are identical in both bricks. However, `du -s /var/local/brick0/data` shows that azathoth has about 3G more data (445G vs 442G) than

Hi, Have you checked for any file system errors on the brick mount point? I once was facing weird io errors and xfs_repair fixed the issue. What about the heal? Does it report any pending heals? On Feb 15, 2018 14:20, "Dave Sherohman" <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > Well, it looks like I've stumped the list, so I did a bit of additional > digging myself: > >

Lets say you had 4 servers and you wanted to setup replicate and distribute. What methoid would be better: server sdb1 xen0 brick0 xen1 mirror0 xen2 brick1 xen3 mirror1 replicate block0 - brick0 mirror0 replicate block1 - brick1 mirror1 distribute unify - block0 block1 or server sdb1 sdb2 xen0 brick0 mirror3 xen1 brick1 mirror0 xen2 brick2 mirror1 xen3 brick3 mirror2 replicate block0 -