similar to: questions regarding nsswitch and the internal-sftp server and ChrootDirectory options

I'm running a CentOS 6.5 chroot to build Pale Moon (a Firefox fork) for older machines running distros like Puppy linux. Before anyone asks... * Yes, even though the older machines are using "ancient" glibc, etc, they do have security patches back-ported, e.g. http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=90461 "Lucid Puppy Revitalized as 5.2.8.7 - December,

Hi, I have installed a centos65_guest_1 system on a centos65 host with virt-manager. By default libvirt has a default network in NAT mode. At centos65_guest_1 when pinging to google it works. But I would like to use a routed mode for production enviroment with some services online, like http, ftp, ssh, etc. I have created the virtual network 192.168.100.0/24 with routed mode, and I have

On Feb 10, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org> wrote: > Other people are interested in doing the same. My choices are... > * explain how to install CentOS 6.5, which options to choose, turn > off boot-to-gui, and how to download and build newer gcc, yasm, > and python-2.7 to duplicate my build environment, etc, etc. > * or send out a 1.3 gigabyte

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:43:39AM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote > The point I was making is to make the old CentOS 6.5 environment as > a chroot. That's exactly my intention. As I said in my original message... >> * or send out a 1.3 gigabyte centos65.tar.xz and give simple >> instructions to extract the archive, copy over /etc/resolv.conf, >> bind-mount

Hello, I'm aware of the fact that ChrootDirectory requires that the target directory is root-owned, and I think I've mostly understood why that is necessary, at least within the context of someone who has full shell access. However, I am wondering if that possibility for privilege escalation still exists with a configuration like this: Match Group sftp ForceCommand internal-sftp

Hi, This is either a query or a feature request. I have a system where sftp users are chrooted using scponly, which while requiring much more setup than OpenSSH's internal-sftp method, has the useful feature of allowing an initial chroot to a subdirectory, typically the one used for file exchange. I've searched for a way to do the same thing with OpenSSH. So far haven't found it. If

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1564 Summary: non-accessible user's home directory not reported when ChrootDirectory=none Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sshd

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036 Priority: P5 Bug ID: 2036 Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Summary: Add %g user group name parameter for ChrootDirectory Severity: enhancement Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux Reporter: sue at pennine.com Hardware: ix86 Status:

Hello, I've tried many places, finally ending up here to ask my question: why is it so vital that the directory used with the ChrootDirectory directive is root-owned? Like many people I'm trying to use this in a webhosting environment where several users get sftp-only access to some directory, usually something like /home/user/web/part-of-website. I can be sure that there are no setuid

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2289 Bug ID: 2289 Summary: arandom(4) as documented in sshd_config(5)?s ChrootDirectory option does not exist on all platforms Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.7p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Hey guys, I have read all the messages regarding this issue on the mailing list and I did notice that quite a few people are not exactly happy with the new easiness of the chroot support introduced to openssh. I'm one of them and I think to support my special configuration, the implementation would need to be changed. I'm right now setting up a small web hosting company an every

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1574 Summary: trailing white space on Forced Command within ChrootDirectory causes failure Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1726 Summary: ChrootDirectory doesn't work with SE Linux Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Platform: Other URL: http://bugs.debian.org/556644 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd

Under "ChrootDirectory" there is a line that says, "This path, and all its components, must be root-owned directories that are not writable by any other user or group." When I first read this "all its components" seemed to mean that all directories and files within this directory must be root owned and root only writable. This seemed odd as I would not be able to

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > From: Sue Spence <sue at pennine.com> > Date: 13 August 2012 08:02:08 GMT+01:00 > To: "susan.spence" <susan.spence at db.com> > Subject: ssh > >

Hi, (please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list) If compiled with SELinux support, OpenSSH 4.8 current cvs fails for accounts where the new ChrootDirectory option is active : debug1: PAM: establishing credentials debug3: PAM: opening session debug2: User child is on pid 1695 debug3: mm_request_receive entering debug1: PAM: establishing credentials debug3: safely_chroot: checking

Hi all, I am using Match directive and internal-sftp to chroot sftp users into their directory. Connection and login works. I can change directories and put/get files. Also logging of the internal sftp-process works (created a /dev/log socket inside the chroot). As soon as I use the 'ls' command, nothing happens and the the process gets stuck. Listing files does work as soon as I remove

Hi, According to the sshd_config manual page the option ChrootDirectory can be used to force a chroot:ed environment for the SSHD server. But as I understand the manual page this is a global setting and it is not possible to specify this per SSH subsystem. We are building a system where we need users to be able to log on from remote machines via SSH, but with the tweaks that we (for security

Hello, I'm trying to set up an sftp (sshfs) service accessible to users with a normal account on a server, but which would be restricted to a subset of the directory hierarchy normally accessible to the users in question, in practice a single directory. The idea would be to allow file access to this directory with a passwordless public key, but keep rest of the users file accessible only with

Hi I'm using Centos 5 with Openssh-5.0p1 installed (and OpenSSL 0.98b and Zlib 1.2.3-3). I've managed to get a chroot'd SFTP session using ChrootDirectory and the new built-in SFTP subsystem. However, when I use SSH to connect to the same account the session hangs rather than closing the connection. This happens whether or not I use /sbin/nologin /bin/false or even /bin/sh