similar to: Pulling stalls before 52MB (works via netcat)

i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i issue following command for putting udp datagram : $nc -uvvz <host> <port> it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does not returns from recv()

Greetings, I am porting the openssh-portable 6.8 release to the HP NonStop (NSE) platform. Prior versions were no real problem, with minor tweeks. However, with the inclusion of regress/netcat.c, which depends on arpa/telnet.h, we have an issue. Unfortunately, the platform does not have this file, nor anything like it - telnet is done rather differently. We do have a version of netcat (0.7.1

Assuming in a secure and trusted env, we want to get the maximum transfer speed without the overhead from ssh. Thanks. Fred -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20121213/654f543f/attachment-0001.html>

If anyone is using the HPN patch on a high performance link I was wondering if you could take a moment to answer a quick question Are you seeing vastly different performance between scp throughput and sftp throughput? On my test network (pittsburgh to chicago) I'm getting 26MB/s with scp (arcfour) and only 6.4MB/s with sftp (arcfour). We just started looking into this but it woudl be nice

Hello everybody, regression tests do use `nc -U` since commit 0e4e955 to test for Unix domain socket forwarding. This fails on systems that have GNU netcat installed as that does not support Unix domain sockets. In fact it does not understand the `-U` option at all. What way to go there? -- main(a){char*c=/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH"

https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg "SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network throughput of SCP, especially on long and high bandwith network links. Modifying the ssh code to allow the buffers

http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Mike Stevens and I just released a new set of high performance networking patches for OpenSSH 3.9p1, 4.0p1, and 4.1p1. These patches will provide the same set of functionality across all 3 revisions. New functionality includes 1) HPN performance even without both sides of the connection being HPN enabled. As long as the bulk data flow is in the

I''ve tried ssh blowfish and scp arcfour. both are CPU limited long before the 10g link is. I''vw also tried mbuffer, but I get broken pipe errors part way through the transfer. I''m open to ideas for faster ways to to either zfs send directly or through a compressed file of the zfs send output. For the moment I; zfs send > pigz scp arcfour the file gz file to the

The HPN12 patch available from http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh addresses performance issues with bulk data transfer over high bandwidth delay paths. By adjusting internal flow control buffers to better fit the outstanding data capacity of the path significant improvements in bulk data throughput performance are achieved. In other words, transfers over the internet are a lot

Hello Are there plans to merge the hpn-ssh (http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/) and the LPK (http://code.google.com/p/openssh-lpk/) into the mainline openssh. Adding lpk has been logged as a bug in bugzilla as They are two patches that I always apply as the performance boost from hpn-ssh is substantial to say the least, and centralisation of the authorized_keys into a LDAP server

Hello, I know this has come up before; but is the HPN patch (or elements thereof) currently being considered for integration in to the OpenSSH code base? Are there pending issues (buffer management, none cipher, etc) which still need to be addressed? We have been using HPN-SSH for over a year now, and like others, have observed significant performance improvement over standard OpenSSH. I can

Howdy, As a note, we now have HPN patch for OpenSSH 4.2 at http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Its still part of the last set of patches (HPN11) so there aren't any additional changes in the code. It patches, configures, compiles, and passes make tests without a problem. I've not done extensive testing for this version of openssh but I don't foresee any problems. I

Hi, I tried different encryptions like arc four, but always with the same result. BTW: googling shows some similar questions and they are stuck on set same speed +-. But non of that solutions helped me. /G?tz > Am 11.08.2015 um 12:14 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > > Usually problem in encryption. > > try cipher arcfour or apply hpn patches to

Hello list, right now SSH Tunnel / scp is reaches just around 76Mb/s on my E5 Xeon using AES-NI but openssl reaches around 600-700Mb/s using 128aes-cbc cipher. As far as i understand http://www.psc.edu/index.php/hpn-ssh this is due to very small buffers in ssh / scp. Is there any work on this? Like autotuning the buffer size? Are there plans to integrate the hpn patches? Greets, Stefan

Triple Release Day! James Wan, from the Solaris Quality Engineering group, has released the Megacli test suite. More information on Megacli test suite can be found at: http://opensolaris.org/os/community/storage/tests/ http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/README http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/test/ontest-stc2/src/suites/storage/megacli/

Hi, http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/ Clearly, the HPN patches significantly boost throughput performance. This enhancement is entirely from tuning the SSH buffer sizes. Alex Tavcar

BSD/OS issues with 1.0.2a dev make tests [ -d `pwd`/regress ] || mkdir -p `pwd`/regress [ -d `pwd`/regress/unittests ] || mkdir -p `pwd`/regress/unittests [ -d `pwd`/regress/unittests/test_helper ] || mkdir -p `pwd`/regress/unittests/test_helper [ -d `pwd`/regress/unittests/sshbuf ] || mkdir -p `pwd`/regress/unittests/sshbuf [ -d `pwd`/regress/unittests/sshkey ] || mkdir -p

Hello, I know that this has been asked before, just wanted to mention that I, too, would like to see the HPN SSH functionality incorporated in the standard OpenSSH. Would there be technical disadvantages integrating the changes? I know we are all pretty busy, but I would certainly spend time to help, e.g. with testing, documentation, etc. Cheers --pwo -- Peter W. Osel - http://pwo.de/ - pwo

I know i''m probably doing something REALLY stupid.....but for some reason i can''t get send/recv to work over ssh. I just built a new media server and i''d like to move a few filesystem from my old server to my new server but for some reason i keep getting strange errors... At first i''d see something like this: pfexec: can''t get real path of

On 24/02/15 21:56, Tim Rice wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Damien Miller wrote: > > | On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Tom G. Christensen wrote: > | > | > I've switched to HEAD in the git repo and it now builds on Solaris > | > 2.6, 7, 8 and 9 but the testsuite still cannot be built due to the > | > missing <err.h>. > > The err.h issue is fixes but there still