similar to: Issue With SSHD Password Guesses

This is the 2nd revision of the Advisory. 1. Versions affected: Serveral versions of OpenSSH's sshd between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain an input validation error that can result in an integer overflow and privilege escalation. All versions between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain a bug in the PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt code. All versions between 2.9.9 and 3.3

This is the 2nd revision of the Advisory. 1. Versions affected: Serveral versions of OpenSSH's sshd between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain an input validation error that can result in an integer overflow and privilege escalation. All versions between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain a bug in the PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt code. All versions between 2.9.9 and 3.3

Hi there, when enabling the option PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt, a login with password is always possible, even though when you disabled it with PasswordAuthentication no and PermitRootLogin without-password! Is this intended? Why is there no documentation about this (or at least a waring in the default configuration file)? The problem is, it is enabled in the default installation of Debian

I looked around for a while, but couldn't find any code for requiring multiple authentication mechanisms in openssh. So I wrote an implemention. I thought at first I should change the PasswordAuthentication, PubkeyAuthentication, etc. keywords to allow no/yes/required. But there's some funky stuff in auth2.c with respect to keyboard interactive auth that would make this kind of

This is the 4th revision of the Advisory. This document can be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/preauth.adv 1. Versions affected: Serveral versions of OpenSSH's sshd between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain an input validation error that can result in an integer overflow and privilege escalation. All versions between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain a bug in the

This is the 4th revision of the Advisory. This document can be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/preauth.adv 1. Versions affected: Serveral versions of OpenSSH's sshd between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain an input validation error that can result in an integer overflow and privilege escalation. All versions between 2.3.1 and 3.3 contain a bug in the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629 Summary: sshd_config & PAM backwards compatibility Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P5 Component: PAM support AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

Help! I am trying to get debug output working with sftp-server, and can''t seem to find the appropriate information to get it working. Yes, I have recompiled sftp-server to include defining DEBUG_SFTP_SERVER. I found that myself in the code before finding it in several postings as the common answer to others having this problem. In addition, I have set up the sshd_config file

1. Versions affected: All versions of OpenSSH's sshd between 2.9.9 and 3.3 contain an input validation error that can result in an integer overflow and privilege escalation. OpenSSH 3.4 and later are not affected. OpenSSH 3.2 and later prevent privilege escalation if UsePrivilegeSeparation is enabled in sshd_config. OpenSSH 3.3 enables

When using PAM to do password authenticaion the attempt/failure counter appears to be getting confused. This is using a rh62 system with the openssh-2.9p2-1 rpms... On the client side... [matthewm at toadhall (7) matthewm]$ grep Auth /etc/ssh/ssh_config RhostsAuthentication no RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no RSAAuthentication no PubkeyAuthentication yes

Starting from May-June, we at "Compiler Tree" would start porting clang compiler to use MLIR as middle end target. If someone has already started a similar effort we would love to collaborate with them. If someone would like to work with us, we are ready to form a group and collaborate. If there are sharing opportunities from Fortran side, we would like to consider the same. We are

Hi Prashanth, On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 10:22 AM Prashanth N R via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Starting from May-June, we at "Compiler Tree" would start porting clang compiler to use MLIR as middle end target. If someone has already started a similar effort we would love to collaborate with them. If someone would like to work with us, we are ready to

Agreed! Is the code already available? What are your plans for it, and are you interested in collaboration with the rest of the LLVM community? -Chris > On Jan 11, 2020, at 11:58 AM, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi, Prashanth, > > That's great news! It sounds like you've made a lot of progress, and I certainly hope that you

Hi Petr- 1. We compile SPEC benchmarks bwaves and xchange currently. We are close to compiling fotonik at this point. 2. We released the source as experimental for the community to take a look. Soon we will open source the entire history of development(we are working on the script to upload the history). thanks, -Prashanth On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 4:20 AM Petr Penzin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev

Hi- In August we made an announcement of "FC: A new fortran front end" [1]. At that time to get an end-to-end solution, we made FC to emit LLVM IR directly. At present, we have upgraded FC to emit MLIR. Currently the language supported is close to Fortran-95. Apart from 400+ unit test cases, out framework passes two SPEC-2017 benchmarks successfully. Currently we are cleaning up the

Is there a way for a PAM module to force a client (and the server) to use kbd-interactive? As far as I can tell, when in the INITIAL_LOGIN phase, all communication with the client returns a PAM_CONV_ERR. I am trying to write a PAM module that will prompt a user for a second username and a second password in order for the module to succeed so that proper authentication relies on the ability

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774 Summary: banner is displaying twice (/etc/issue) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.7.1p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: security Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

I am running Solaris 8 with the Basic Security Module (BSM) loaded and Sun's Enterprise Authentication Mechanism (SEAM) installed. Our servers are using Sun One Directory Services (LDAP) for authorization and Sun's Kerberos 5 implementation for authentication. We have been using OpenSSH 3.4p1 with OpenSSL 0.9.6f and everything has been working fine. We are updating our OpenSSH and OpenSSL

Neat, another fortran compiler option. Does anyone have a list/comparison of all the LLVM fortran compilers? I'm not really tracking this, since Fortran isn't really my area of expertise, but I've seen the following. Perhaps there are even more? "Flang". The original of the name, I think? Abandoned. https://github.com/llvm-flang/flang "Fort" -- fork of the above

Hi Michael- 1. We intent to fork clang for MLIR at a particular release and develop. We will mostly merge with the master as soon as we reach a good milestones. Most of the development is expected to happen in github or some such version control system. 2. MLIR is extensible and we are hoping that constructs like exceptions can be represented in MLIR. As we dive deep into design we might be able