similar to: IPQoS

Hey, I have rather new installation of xen, dom0 is running ntpd and is perfectly in time. All domU''s are ~23s in future. Running ntpd on the domU''s seem to have no effect, /proc/sys/xen/independent_wallclock appears to have no effect. I''m running xen-unstable and 2.6.16-rc4 in AMD64 box. Any tip would be appricated. Thanks, -- ++ytti

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3634 Bug ID: 3634 Summary: IPQoS default should be changed to "none" Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.5p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

Consider this topology domain1-server1 domain2-server2 | | laptop - domain1-server1 ---- domain2-server1 Laptop has two ssh identities, domain1 and domain2. I don't wish to store identity locally in any of the servers. As far as I understand, there isn't any way to limit ssh-agent to allow only signing

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1964 Bug #: 1964 Summary: QoS/DSCP names false translated to ToS hex value Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2018-08-27, Zach Cheung <kuroro.zhang at gmail.com> wrote: > > After upgrading my VMware Fusion (10.1.3) Arch Guest to the latest with > > OpenSSH upgraded from 7.7p1 to 7.8p1, found that ssh from macOS Sierra > > (10.12.6) host to Arch guest via local NAT port forwarding failed, but via > > Arch LAN IP worked,

Hello, all. I've stumbled across what seems to be a traffic prioritization issue in a Linux environment and wonder if anyone else has encountered or addressed this issue. We had planned to use expedited forwarding for our RTP and perhaps our SIP packets. Our plan was to set DSCP to 101110 (by the way, I think document http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/snom+360 is in error as I'm almost

Can anyone comment on the DSCP quality of service settings on your Asterisk server? The network we're setting up has data on the default VLAN, Asterisk server and phones on VLAN 4, and we're using Polycom phones with a PC hooked up to the phone's pass-thru port. What iptables settings are you using on the Asterisk server for DSCP? What are your Polycom DSCP settings? We're using

Hi, Can anybody tell me how to delete DSCP or TOS setting using iptable command. iptables --list OUTPUT --table mangle Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination DSCP tcp -- anywhere anywhere tcp spt:http DSCP s et 0x08 DSCP udp --

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Adam Eijdenberg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 9:43 AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Could you try turning off IPQoS setting (ssh -oIPQoS=none ...) and seeing > > whether that makes any difference? > > Yes - setting -oIPQoS=none on the client allows for a successful > connection to the server. > > Would you still like me

Hello everybody, I have tried several iptables versions (from 1.2.4 to 1.2.6a) to mark outgoing packets (change the DSCP field) with no success. #iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -d 10.0.0.3 -j DSCP --set-dscp 0x2 iptables v1.2.6a: unknown arg ''--set-dscp'' TOS target is working fine, but I want to create different codes for EF and AF classes in a diffserv

Has anyone figured this out yet? Lots of places say to add the following to sip.conf of an Asterisk 1.2 system (current production machine/Asterisk as root): tos=0xB8 (Hex B8 = Decimal 184 = Binary 10111000) or if you are running Asterisk v1.4 or newer: tos_sip=cs3 ; Sets TOS for SIP packets. tos_audio=ef ; Sets TOS for RTP audio packets. tos_video=af41 ;

Added the line as above: 'IPQoS lowdelay throughput', restarted the SSH service, tried SSH-ing and Git-ing... same error as before: 'packet_write_wait: Connection to X.X.X.X port 22: Broken pipe'. ________________________________ From: Zach Cheung <kuroro.zhang at gmail.com> Sent: 29 August 2018 07:17 To: ohadfjunkbox at outlook.com Cc: dtucker at dtucker.net;

This problem is driving nuts, so I am seeking help here. Your help will be deeply appreciated. I have made myself a Linux bridge with eth1 and eth0 to form br0. Then I run a script to configure tc with htb on it. But I can never match non-icmp traffic ( such as tcp and udp ) with TOS or DSCP values such as 0x68. The full story as follows :- 1. On the source testing machine, I do this to set

The virtualization is VMware Workstation 12.x, NOT Fusion. Again, I'd like to point that downgrading to 7.7p2 "solved" the issue and that I'm using the same virtualization software for ages (which makes me disbelieve the issue lies with it). I've seen the comment about zero-length passwords... I'm not techie enough to understand the code there (or the technical

I''m successfully using HTB + GRED to shape traffic based on the DSCP field. I would like to strip the DSCP and possibly replace it with normal ToS bits on egress traffic leaving my network. Leaving DSCP set is pointless, and could potentially cause problems with some ISPs that use DSCP internally I suppose. Setting ToS bits would seem ideal as most networks still honor it to varying

Did anyone ever answer this one? THIS is what I am trying to do: >[LARTC] cbq+sfq and DSCP marking >Maria Joana Urbano stmaria@dei.uc.pt >Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:29:42 +0000 > > * Previous message: [LARTC] Monitoring.... > * Next message: [LARTC] two routes 1 network card > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] >

Hi, DSCP match in /tcrules/ doesn''t work with CS6 and CS7, it provides an error "invalid value" for string and hexa values. It seems that it comes from /Chain.pm/, in the function /do_dscp/: fatal_error( "Invalid DSCP ($dscp)" ) unless defined $value && $value < 0x2f && ! ( $value & 1 ); I dont understand why "$value < 0x2f", but

Hello - What I want to do seems very simple - I want to make sure any H.323 traffic gets processed before anything else entering or leaving this network. The network has a videoconferencing device on the LAN at 192.168.16.4. A Linux firewall NATs an external IP Address to this internal address and I have appropriate SNAT and DNAT rules that work. The NAT and connection tracking rules all work

When I'm running interactive ssh session which is ControlMaster and I run scp or sftp to same host, creating another channel, it seems that ssh is stuffing the packets together exceeding MTU. I've for years ran QoS where I prioritize small packets, as it is clean and easy way to guarantee low latency to pretty much all you care for. Unfortunately ControlMaster packet stuffing breaks this,

hello I''m new here can I ask about how to do a patch dscp to shorewall installed from the package in ubuntu? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial.