similar to: PuTTY: Forwarded connection refused by server: Administratively prohibited [open failed]

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2674 Bug ID: 2674 Summary: [CONFIRMED] channel 4: open failed: administratively prohibited: open failed Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.4p1 Hardware: Other OS: OpenBSD Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1051 Bug ID: 1051 Summary: nftables DNAT not working Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi, I don't know, if this is a developer question, but it is too strange for the user list and maybe a possible bug. My setup is a little bit complicated, but I will try to explain as simple as possible. I've got 3 server: All Server: System: Debian 6 Interfaces on server1: eth0 tun0 tun1 $ ssh -v OpenSSH_5.5p1 Debian-6+squeeze1, OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010 Server 1 is for connecting

I'm using fedora 9, 64-bit edition, on a machine acting as a client. I've installed samba-client 3.2.0 from a binary package. I amn't running the server portion of samba(smbd, nmbd, or even winbindd). I'm trying to access shares on another windows machine, on the same network 192.168.1.0/24. Both machines, the client and the server, are using DHCP to acquire IP addresses. When I

> Winton-- > > Excellent! Absolutely wonderful. > > I'm wondering which apps/encapsulators support 4A? This gets me > around > the DNS leakage problem quite nicely. > > Incidentally, we do need SOCKS5 support -- if for no other > reason, the > fact that there's *operating system* level support in OSX for SOCKS5 > redirection. So

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Ault, James R (CRD) wrote: > I was reading the changelog from version 2.9 that was recently released, and I coudln't help noticing > this item: > > from openssh changelog: > > - markus at cvs.openbsd.org 2001/04/17 12:55:04 > [channels.c ssh.c] > undo socks5 and https support since they are not really used and >

My desire is to form a connection from my laptop running ubuntu to a SOCKS5 server listed on the Internet. I have read the Ubuntu man page on OpenSSH client program. The description indicates that I have to connect to given host name (assumed to be an ip address?) with optional username. I want the server receive my Internet traffic in SOCKS5 protocol and respond to my computer the requested

here's an up-to-date patch, should apply to both openbsd and non-openbsd versions of openssh. i did only test ipv4 addresses. Index: channels.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.bin/ssh/channels.c,v retrieving revision 1.191 diff -u -r1.191 channels.c --- channels.c 24 Jun 2003 08:23:46 -0000 1.191 +++ channels.c 25 Jun 2003 12:14:19

Attached is a very small patch that allows the ssh clients to use the socks5 library. It should work with socks4 but is untested. Tested on linux only configure --with-socks configure --with-socks5 Also included is a configure option to disable scp statistics --disable-scp-stats modified files openssh-2.9.9p2/acconfig.h openssh-2.9.9p2/channels.c openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in

Le mercredi 18 janvier 2017 ? 8:55 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 07:42:50AM -0800, Ron Frederick wrote: Thank you for your answers. > [...] > > One thing that makes UDP over SOCKS more complicated for SSH is that > > SOCKS normally keeps the UDP packets it forwards as UDPl, just adding > > a small header to each packet. If you want to get the

Le mardi 17 janvier 2017 ? 9:20 +1100, Darren Tucker a ?crit : > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Romain Vimont <rom at rom1v.com> wrote: > [...] > > As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" > > cannot proxify UDP packets. > > > > Are there deep reasons why OpenSSH does not implement them (security, or > >

I have a linux server with 3 public IPs, and I use SSH tunnelling to connect to each of them. Let's call them: 1.1.1.1 (venet0:0), 1.1.1.2 (venet0:1), 1.1.1.3 (venet0:2). When I tunnel using 1.1.1.1, outgoing IP for the public is: 1.1.1.1. But when I tunnel using 1.1.1.2 or 1.1.1.3, the outgoing IP for the public is still 1.1.1.1. I've been googling for days, and tried relevant channels

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 02:08:36PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote: > > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > > with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. > > [...] I'll try to change tinc so it will allow connections via SOCKS5 > even if it cannot resolve the hostname itself. I added the ability for tinc to

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:33:35PM +0000, Uwe Werler wrote: > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > with configured (socks5) proxy which fails behind restrictive firewalls. You are right that it shouldn't be necessary to do this with SOCKS5. With SOCKS4, it needs to know the exact address, and then I just used that for SOCKS5 as well. > Is there

Hello Guus, thanks for Your fast reply. Does it mean only socks is affected and http proxy should work? If this is the case then this may be a temp. solution. Thanks and regards! Uwe Am 27.10.2015 14:08:36, schrieb Guus Sliepen: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:33:35PM +0000, Uwe Werler wrote: > > > I wonder why tinc tries to resolve host names before connection even > > with

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2417 Bug ID: 2417 Summary: SOCKS5 should respond with appropriate error reply in error situations Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.8p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hi there, I have been looking at a system which has the Intel ICH7 south bridge. Whenever I try to probe the SMBus on this system with 'smbmsg -p', I get a lot of status=41 timeout messages in dmesg from the ichsmb(4) driver. I have been given the addresses of the SMBus peripherals and have tried initiating reads to their register space directly using 'smbmsg', with the same

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:02:57AM -0700, S Bob wrote: > On 11/12/20 7:50 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > If this is actually something you want to do with regularity, I > > suggest using the SSH SOCKS proxy (with the DynamicForward port), and > > configure Firefox to use the localhost:port as a SOCKS5 proxy. Then > > all traffic in firefox will be routed over the ssh

Hi, Currently, OpenSSH only accepts the SOCKS5 command "CONNECT": <https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/tree/channels.c#n1281> The RFC also specifies the commands "BIND" and "UDP ASSOCIATE": <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1928#section-4> As a consequence, in particular, a SOCKS5 server started with "ssh -D" cannot proxify UDP packets. Are

I am having an issue with Putty v.60 with Pageant v.60 under Wine-1.1.5. The OS is Fedora 10 x86_64, and the Wine it the current RPM version for Fedora. It is not that Pageant or Putty is not working; both do load. Putty does talk SSH2 properly. The actual issue is that Keys that are loaded into Pageant v.60 are not available to Putty v.60 for authentication; I suspect that this due to