similar to: [Bug 2279] New: ListenAddress option does not allow IPv6 link-local addresses

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2252 Bug ID: 2252 Summary: RekeyLimit breaks ClientAlive Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2264 Bug ID: 2264 Summary: RekeyLimit option does not allow '4G' value when UINT_MAX is 0xffffffff Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1071 Bug ID: 1071 Summary: nftables: set does not work within inet table with option flags interval Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1491 Summary: no field sin6_scope_id on AIX 4.3.3 Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.1p1 Platform: PPC OS/Version: AIX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ssh AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Build of 5.1p1 fails on SCO OSR6 with the error: UX:acomp: ERROR: "addrmatch.c", line 100: undefined struct/union member: sin6_scope_id configure checks for presence of struct sockaddr_in6 and uses the system declaration if found (via #define HAVE_STRUCT_SOCKADDR_IN6 in config.h) If not found, the struct is declared in openbsd-compat/fake-rfc2553.h. OSR6 has struct sockaddr_in6 but it

Openssh 4.4p1 and 4.5p1 SCO Openserver 6 w/mp1, mp2 While installing v4.5p1, I noticed this sshd syslog error which began appearing when I upgraded from v4.3p2 to v4.4p1: Sep 1 17:54:41 tenzing sshd[12837]: error: Bind to port 22 on :: failed: \ Network is unreachable. sshd -d reports: debug1: Bind to port 22 on ::. Bind to port 22 on :: failed: Network is unreachable. debug1: Bind

Thanks, I will apply your patch, especially since (for the record) Hideaki posted in a reply: > > The suggested fix Daniel Hartmeier (an OpenBSD developer) had when > > I asked (for I'm not really a coder and I wanted to double check > > that this was a valid problem) was making the mask[w] assignment > > conditional like thus: > > > > if (w <

4.0p1 and 4.2p1 are affected for me, I'm using Linux based around a FC2 build (~2 years old). I'm trying to login with password authentication from psftp.exe (part of PuTTY) but it. Maybe this bug isn't with OpenSSH itself but a supporting library, I would appreciate your assistance in tracking down the problem. I have tried getting a 'core' file out of SSH with

I am running rsync over a VPN. The connection has been stable for some time, but recently it has started failing. I am including the strace of the failure below. Basically, the client disconnects typically with an error 12. I have 3 other clients using the same openvpn/rsync configuration, and those are stable, so I am fairly confident this is something on this particular link. The

On 07/29/2015 01:45 AM, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > > Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a > different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. > > Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and > 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM

Just saw this from eWeek. "IBM, which paid roughly $500,000 for the testing, and SuSE (pronounced "SOOS-ah") were announcing the certification jointly. " The article is here: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1212529,00.asp --- Darren Reed <avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au> wrote: > In some mail from twig les, sie said: > > > > I actually just asked

Take 2 at bouncing this to the rest of the original recipients through a different MTA, since mail.zytor.com refused to accept it the first time. Please re-add Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at obsidianresearch.com> and 793921 at bugs.debian.org to the CC for replies. On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:34:00PM +0930, Ron wrote: > > Hi Jason, > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 03:45:30PM -0600, Jason

Hi, I am trying to get ipv6 firewall running. I did a very simple ip6tables rules and noticed very long running yum updates. I think that happened because firewall is dropping outgoing packets to port 80. Well, I thought to mitigate the issue and changed outgoing from drop to reject. Now I try manually # strace telnet 2a02:180:ffff:1::551f:b966 80 ... connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6,

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1950 Bug #: 1950 Summary: sshd tries to bind over and over to ::1 for several seconds Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.9p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Here's the details and some debugging I did for starters, but I have no idea where to proceed from here. Help please? Command to reproduce should be in the strace output below. -Dan P.S. Sorry for sending this a few times; I think only one will make it through to the list since I wasn't subscribed initially. $ rsync --version rsync version 3.1.0 protocol version 31 Copyright (C)

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401 yoshfuji at linux-ipv6.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|misc. ipv4-mapped address |ipv4 mapped address (ipv4 in |support fix |ipv6) and ipv6 support fix ------- Additional

Hello, I'm using an rsync server on a Linux packages repository (deb packages) to sync all mirrors. The mirrors sync every 10 minutes. Most of the time, there is nothing to sync, except a timestamp file, so the sync is pretty fast. Anyway, after it has been working well for some time (between 2 and 24hours), the rsync daemon crashes. It is still running but seems to retry something

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jun 13, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Again, this is branch code, but if I can see something wrong in platform > independent portion, I'll track it on the trunk. > > > I hate to be the one to start this thread, but I have to say it at

John Todd's Onlamp article mentions an OpenBSD version as of June 2003. Have I been sleeping while reading asterisk-users? Is it a seperate project or is it just making Asterisk portable? Who is working on this and is it in the main CVS yet? Do they have device drivers ported or just the software parts of Asterisk? I think the software parts would be relatively simple but time consuming.

On a dry run, rsync displays a speedup value calculated from the total size of the source file data and the amount of data sent over the connection, but this value is meaningless and grossly misleading because the file data is not sent over the connection. Example: [matt@mattlaptop2 test]$ rsync -avi -n ~/eclipse/releases/eclipse-SDK-3.3-linux-gtk.tar.gz . sending incremental file list