similar to: [Bug 2277] New: config: add option to customize moduli file location

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2276 Bug ID: 2276 Summary: AuthorizedKeysCommand: add an option for alternate owner Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1371 Summary: Add PKCS#11 (Smartcards) support into OpenSSH Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.7p1 Platform: All URL: http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/openssh-pkcs11 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component:

Hi Alon, I confirmed with pkcs11-tool (from OpenSC) and I can confirm that pressing return when asked for the pin causes the login to stop (and not to try a empty pin). Can you confirm if a empty pin is actually a valid pin, and if not, can the patch be accepted? Once again, the problem is that from a user experience, *some/most* users would expect they can skip pkcs11 token authentication just

Signed-off-by: Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev at gmail.com> --- ssh-agent.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/ssh-agent.c b/ssh-agent.c index 9e2a37f..415a5ea 100644 --- a/ssh-agent.c +++ b/ssh-agent.c @@ -68,7 +68,9 @@ #include <time.h> #include <string.h> #include <unistd.h> +#ifdef HAVE_UTIL_H #include <util.h> +#endif #include

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <alon.barlev at gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 June 2016 at 20:58, Nuno Gon?alves <nunojpg at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seems there is a bug with the pkcs11 feature where a zero-length >> PIN is accepted. I believe this is a bug, since the user might want to >> press return when asked for the PIN to

[[Sending again, as for some strange reason it is not accepted]] Hello OpenSSH developers, I maintain external patch for PKCS#11 smartcard support into OpenSSH[1] , many users already apply and use this patch. I wish to know if anyone is interesting in working toward merging this into mainline. I had some discussion with Damien Miller, but then he disappeared. Having standard smartcard

Hi, Working with apache-sshd I found that it forces ~/.ssh/config to be owned by user without group/others permissions. It failed for me within my valid openssh environment. Within sources (readconf.c::read_config_file), I found that openssh only enforces ownership by user and not group/others write. When I opened an issue, I was referred to this[1] wiki page (not sure who maintain it) claiming

Hi, my question is related to the kex algorithm diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 and moduli generation. I've seen that through ssh-keygen, I'm able to re-generate my moduli file used by DH but I'm note sure to understand one point in the ssh-keygen manpage : "Screened DH groups may be installed in /etc/ssh/moduli. It is important that this file contains moduli of a range of

Hi, I have a setup in which I run sshd as unprivileged user at dedicated port to serve specific application. It is working perfectly! One tweak I had to do, since the AuthorizedKeysCommand feature requires file to be owned by root, I had to use root owned command at root owned directory, although it does not add a security value. At auth2-pubkey.c::user_key_command_allowed2(), we have the

Alon, On 12/18/2018 06:52 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > OK... So you have an issue... > > First, you need to delegate your smartcard to remote machine, probably > using unix socket redirection managed by openssh. This can be done in > many levels... > 1. Delegate USB device, this will enable only exclusive usage of the > smartcard by remote machine. > 2. Delegate PC/SC, this

Hi, Can anybody briefly explain the significance of the updated moduli file? Is this a critical update? Should all existing installations update their moduli file? Thanks in advance, -- Dan

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081 Bug ID: 2081 Summary: extend the parameters to the AuthorizedKeysCommand Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: sshd

Hello, I've looked for a BIDI HOW-TO, but did not find any. I use wine-0.9.5, and run IE using ies4linux. It works great including Hebrew showing Hebrew text correctly. The problem is that I could not write any Hebrew character... Whenever I type a character I get "?". So I've looked at wine-bidi issues, and found that I need to compile wine with icu library. I did! using

Are there any plans on the table to add native support for two-factor authentication, such as password *and* public key? Visa PCI standards require two-factor authentication for remote access and if password+key was available in openssh it would be much easier to maintain and support than a full-blown vpn with all the cross-platform compatibility issues that come with one. Thanks! Jacob

Hello, Maybe I did not understand correctly the PKI trust, so forgive me if I am wrong. For example, I have multiple hosts that all serves as monitoring server, I would like to trust only these hosts, so I enrol a certificate for these using "monitoring" principal, so I can connect only to these. At first I thought we can do Match statement at ssh_config, however, the Match is being

Hi, It seems there is a bug with the pkcs11 feature where a zero-length PIN is accepted. I believe this is a bug, since the user might want to press return when asked for the PIN to ignore that slot/key. This is caused at pkcs11_rsa_private_encrypt: snprintf(prompt, sizeof(prompt), "Enter PIN for '%s': ", si->token.label); pin = read_passphrase(prompt, RP_ALLOW_EOF); if

Hello, The version 0.11 of "PKCS#11 support in OpenSSH" is published. Changes: 1. Updated against OpenSSH 4.3p2. 2. Modified against Roumen Petrov's X.509 patch (version 5.4), so self-signed certificates are treated by the X.509 patch now. 3. Added --pkcs11-x509-force-ssh if X.509 patch applied, until some issues with the X.509 patch are resolved. 4. Fixed issues with gcc-2. You

On 13 December 2016 at 21:00, Kenny Simpson <theonetruekenny at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > Is there any support (existing or planned) for host keys/certs being > managed by some hardware device (tpm,hsm,etc..) instead of a flat > file? man ssh search for PKCS#11

Hello, Is there any support (existing or planned) for host keys/certs being managed by some hardware device (tpm,hsm,etc..) instead of a flat file? thanks, -Kenny

Alon, I should have provided more background. You are assuming that I could perform the PKINIT prior to connecting to the SSH server. In this case (and others) there is an interest in not exposing the kerberos servers to the world and thus someone connecting remotely would not be able to obtain a TGT or do a PKINIT. The goal would be for SSH to handle all the auth and only after connecting to