similar to: sites and DRS replication

Hello, I have PDC sernet samba 4.1.6 (DOM4) and BDC w2k8 (domain & forest level 2008R2) I'd like use web services from w2k8, but if I run from windows nltest /dsgetdc:DOMAIN /ws samba return: Getting dc name failed: Status = 1355 0x54b ERROR_NO_SUCH_DOMAIN If nltest direct query to samba server i get this error, but if is query directed to w2k8 all works fine. But I dont know how

Hi all, I've been having DNS issues for about 3 months which is causing all sorts of weird problems (most things work fine but then we have days where random machines lose trust/can't login without un-joining and rejoining the domain). The domain was working with no problems for nearly 5 months before this started happening. I have Ubuntu 14.04 running Samba 4.1.6 using the internal

Hai, does anybody please give me a hint whats going on here. Of below is ok or not, what does : >Warning: No NC replicated for Connection! mean if everything else checks out ok. Please someone :-( Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: belle at bazuin.nl [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] >Namens L.P.H. van Belle >Verzonden: vrijdag 25 oktober 2013 8:22

Hello all. Please help me with my problem. I have organization with branches connected through internet by VPN. First branch (B00) have two Dc's in 172.16.0.0/16 network and second branch (B01) have one DC in 172.17.0.0/16 network. All three Dc's built from sources (4.10.2) on freshly installed Debian Stretch. I am using BIND9_DLZ backend. So, 2 Dc's located in one building (B00) works

We have a test samba setup containing two domain controllers (both running samba v4.1.6). Recently we created an ldap group, added around 5000 members to it and then deleted the users from the directory. We set tombstoneLifetime to few days and waited for these ldap objects to be purged from the system. But we notice that the particular group has slowed down considerably for all ldap operations.

On 6/26/2017 2:43 PM, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > Dear list, > > After (almost) successfully removing a dead DC from my domain I am left > with only one visible symptom: > samba-tool drs showrepl shows two stale outbound link for one of the > remaining 2 DCs: > DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=subdom,DC=mydom,DC=com > NTDS DN: CN=NTDS >

If the replication schedules are modified in AD Sites and Services, will Samba 4 respect those? I'd like to change some schedules for some of our lower bandwidth remote offices. Kris

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 17:18:37 +0200 Johannes Engel via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi James, > > thanks a lot. However, in the Windows Sites & Services application > the connection in question does not show up at all. It is only > visible in the samba-tool output and only for the objects > DomainDnsZones and ForestDnsZones... > > Best regards >

Yes they exists on both the DC’s. DC1 Samba 4.6.12 DC2 Samba 4.7.4 Sent from my iPhone On 12 Jan 2018, at 6:34 PM, lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: On 1/12/2018 3:27 AM, Harsh Kukreja wrote: Hi James Thanks for your response. hots -t A iumsvrpdc (use it's fqdn as well) I have verified it with the FQDN which says that the record iumsvrpdc.iumnet.edu.na exists

On 20/10/2020 21:09, Derek Lambert wrote: > I really dislike Raspian, and there's not a 64bit release yet. > > Does the official Debian distro use Heimdal? Ubuntu? Cannot really speak for the rpi, I just use mine as a Unix domain member running raspbian, but it is basically only the distros based on red-hat distros that use MIT. If the Arm version of Ubuntu is like the X86-64

On 10/20/20 3:25 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 20/10/2020 21:09, Derek Lambert wrote: >> I really dislike Raspian, and there's not a 64bit release yet. >> >> Does the official Debian distro use Heimdal? Ubuntu? > > Cannot really speak for the rpi, I just use mine as a Unix domain member running > raspbian, but it is basically only the distros based on

Hi James, thanks a lot. However, in the Windows Sites & Services application the connection in question does not show up at all. It is only visible in the samba-tool output and only for the objects DomainDnsZones and ForestDnsZones... Best regards Johannes Am 27.06.2017 um 17:16 schrieb Johannes Engel: > > Hi James, > > thanks a lot. However, in the Windows Sites &

Dear list, After (almost) successfully removing a dead DC from my domain I am left with only one visible symptom: samba-tool drs showrepl shows two stale outbound link for one of the remaining 2 DCs: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=subdom,DC=mydom,DC=com NTDS DN: CN=NTDS

On 1/11/2018 10:39 AM, Harsh Kukreja via samba wrote: > Hi > > The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is > failing. I have enabled the log level 9. > > samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na > --full-sync -UAdministrator > INFO: Current debug levels: > all: 9 > tdb: 9 > printdrivers: 9 >

Hai, ? when i test my DRS replication, with : samba-tool drs showrepl ms249-lin-007 i have no errors looks ok but, im seeing this as last. ? ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== 5 connections 0 failure. ? ==== OUTBOUND NEIGHBORS ==== 3 connections 0 failure. ? ==== KCC CONNECTION OBJECTS ==== ? Connection -- ??????? Connection name: 3aa92d11-3cc7-4afd-9975-f0f7d2c5013f ??????? Enabled??????? : TRUE

Hello, I've having recurring issues with the second DC in my Samba AD domain. I've demoted/removed the second DC a number of times and re-provisioned it. It'll work for a bit and then replication breaks. Since replication is broken I've been doing the following to remove it: DC-02 systemctl stop samba systemctl disable samba DC-01 samba-tool domain demote

On 2015.11.19, at 4:26 AM, mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com> wrote: > If you plan to keep 4.3.x you can use --enable-fhs from configure script's options (and the two others proposed by configure --help associated to --enable-fhs). Doing that you should have most of your directories reused (/etc/samba, /var/lib/samba...) > > That worked for me as I don't care

Hi, It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity between the spokes should not be required and the communication between them is usually just some stale data. But none of that should affect either of these commands. Unless the DRS

Hi James, thanks a lot for your hint. However, I seem to be unable to find it there. Can you please be a little more specific? I tried to check the replication topology, but no success. Thanks a lot! Best regards Johannes lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> schrieb am Mo., 26. Juni 2017 um 20:52 Uhr: > On 6/26/2017 2:43 PM, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > > Dear

On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > It seems unlikely that the KCC is the cause of these issues. The KCC is > only responsible for telling who to connect (and when) and doesn't > actually affect any underlying network connectivity. Connectivity > between the spokes should not be required and the communication