similar to: FreeBSD winbind UID/GID mapping weirdness

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "FreeBSD winbind UID/GID mapping weirdness"

2014 Oct 30
2
idmap weirdness - wildcard values being used instead of rfc2307 AD values
I've done a lot of research on this and haven't been able to solve the problem. Hopefully someone here has a better understanding of this than I do. The problem is that the UIDs and GIDs are not being fetched from AD. For example "getent passwd doug" returns: doug:*:70003:70005:Doug Meredith:/home/DSTRC/doug:/bin/false My full name has correctly been pulled from AD but the
2005 Aug 04
0
winbind UID/GID mapping
I have read with great interest the chapter on IDMAP in the Samba 3 HOWTO. I was hoping to get some clarification from someone in the know as to the feasibility of using winbind in may setup. Here is what I want to do: 1. I would like to use winbind for a single sign on (SSO) type solution for integrating my linux clients with AD. The goal here is to eliminate local accounts from my linux
2003 Oct 21
2
Samba 3.0.0 -- ACLs are unusable due to UID/SID mapping weirdness :(
Hi, I am sure somebody asks this question about once a week. Since I have not found an answer I assume the worst -- it just does not work. So, here goes my problem. I am testing Samba 3.0.0. I have got UNIX and Windows domain users matching each other one-to-one. The server is running with "security = domain". Everything works fine and all Windows users connecting to Samba get
2014 Jun 24
3
winbind: homeDirectory being ignored
Something strange here. User created using: root at dc1:~# samba-tool user add user7 Abcd1234 --uid-number=1007 --home-directory=/home/user7 --login-shell=/bin/bash User 'user7' created successfully I can see the homeDirectory attribute in the entry. But the home directory that winbind returns is just the template one: root at adclient:~# getent passwd user7
2014 Aug 11
2
Winbind question
Hi, I successfully set up an AD DC, and now, I want to join a file server as member in this domain. I followed this tutorial : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server All works fine, my server join my AD without problem, samba starts fine and winbind too. But when I look at my domain users, the uid/gid returned by winbind are in the TDB range instead of the AD
2014 Apr 10
3
centos 6.5 sernet-samba 4.1.6 member server winbind idmap fail
Hi everybody, I've searched deeply into the samba wiki and the list for some working examples, but I cannot find my way out, I'm a kind of rough samba user (let's say almost newbie).. so asking help here: This is my setup: DC (samba.my.domain.com <http://samba.my.domain.com/>): CentOS 6.5 with sernet-samba 4.1.6 started in "ad" mode (upgraded successfully from
2014 Oct 29
2
SYSTEM gid=70006 in POSIX ACLs ?
Hey all, I decided to use the default ranges in the smb.conf of my member server, so I changed my smb.conf and it looks like that: ================================================== [global] netbios name = MEMBERSRV workgroup = MYDOM security = ADS realm = MYDOM.EXAMPLE.COM encrypt passwords = yes idmap config MYDOM:backend = ad idmap
2016 Aug 12
0
WINBIND: UID and GID false mappings on domain member
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 10:42:54 -0700 (PDT) rawi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Just provisioning with --rfc2307 isn't enough, you personally need > > to add any required RFC2307 attributes. > > But you see my test user has his attributes. From samba-tool. Do you > mean the basic objects, the templates for the user and group? If yes, > how to
2014 Dec 22
0
Mixed Samba4 and 3.6 uids/gids
Hi William, > I have an AD domain (Samba 4.1.13 domain controllers) and some Samba 3.6 > clients. > I would like the uid/gid mappings to be consistent across the two sets of > machines. > > The Samba4 DCs have the following line in smb.conf: > > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes > > and their uids/gids are in sync across all four of them. > > The Samba 3.6 domain
2015 Jan 17
1
clarification regarding RFC2307 winbind backend, please
Can someone please clarify the scope of the remarks in this wiki page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/RFC2307_backend specifically, can you confirm that the following applies only to a Member Server, (not the DC)? https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/RFC2307_backend#Configuring_RFC2307_backend_for_Winbind > Configuring RFC2307 backend for Winbind > > Add the following to the [global]
2013 Feb 21
1
winbind against samba4 AD DC
Hello, Could you please give me some precision about the current state of the winbind support on a member server. I have tried to list what I understand about it. (I suppose that the libnss_winbind symlink are correct in /lib and/or lib64) * samba4 join as member join: samba-tool domain join <dnsdomain> MEMBER smb.conf should contain: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes the AD DC doesn't
2016 Aug 12
0
WINBIND: UID and GID false mappings on domain member
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:41:19 -0700 (PDT) rawi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thank you Rowland for looking into this! > > > > Have you added uidNumber & gidNumber attributes to the user & > > groupobjects in AD ? > > Not myself, I simply provisioned with --use-rfc2307 Just provisioning with --rfc2307 isn't enough, you personally
2013 May 31
1
'Administrator' account (UID 0) on Samba member of a Samba4 AD DC
Hi all, I have a samba server as member of an AD DC. In said AD DC there is the 'administrator' user which has the default UID of 0 (the same as root) from the ADDC: # id administrator uid=0(root) gid=513(SMC\Domain Users) groups=0(root),513(SMC\Domain Users),3000005(SMC\Group Policy Creator Owners),3000009(SMC\Enterprise Admins),512(SMC\Domain Admins),3000007(SMC\Schema Admins) from
2014 Feb 01
3
Samba 4.1.4 and winbind
After the 'you should use winbind saga', I decide that I needed to learn about using winbind with samba 4 clients. So I created a VM running ubuntu 12.04 server and installed and compiled samba 4 to use as a test client. created /usr/local/samba/etc/smb.conf [global] workgroup = EXAMPLE security = ADS realm = EXAMPLE.COM encrypt passwords = yes server string =
2011 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] sitofp inst selection in x86/AVX target [PR9473]
Hello LLVMer's I am now trying to fix a bug PR9473. sitofp instruction in LLVM IR is converted to vcvtsi2sd(also applied to vcvtsi2ss case) for x86/AVX backend, but vcvtsi2sd is somewhat odd instruction format. VCVTSI2SD xmm1, xmm2, r/m32 VCVTSI2SD xmm1, xmm2, r/m64 bits(127:64) of xmm2 is copied to corresponding bits of xmm1, thus in many case xmm1 and xmm2 could be same register.
2017 Dec 31
0
inconsistent winbind on upgraded member server
I upgraded a domain member server from 4.5.5 to 4.6.2. After some initial tests, where everything seemed to be working fine, I upgraded the OS from CentOS 7.3 to 7.4. Now I have intermittent problems with domain users trying to log in to the member server over ssh. After a bunch of troubleshooting I determined that winbind sometimes returns the user home directory and shell incorrectly and
2015 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] TableGen Register Class not matching for MI in 3.6
> On Aug 24, 2015, at 4:46 PM, Ryan Taylor <ryta1203 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is the snippet that matters: > > void > InstrEmitter::AddRegisterOperand(MachineInstrBuilder &MIB, > SDValue Op, > unsigned IIOpNum, > const MCInstrDesc *II, >
2016 Aug 17
0
SOLVED: WINBIND: UID and GID false mappings on domain member
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 04:54:41 -0700 (PDT) rawi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I bump this only to say SOLVED and many thanks to Rowland. > > Lessons learned: > > 1. > Indeed, my problems where related to not having a gidNumber for > "Domain Users". > After adding it I got real wbinfo --user-info on the domain member > (file server). >
2015 Aug 25
2
[LLVMdev] TableGen Register Class not matching for MI in 3.6
Quentin, This is the issue. Somewhere prior to the constrainRegClass, it's assigning the GPRBase sub class of GPR to the MOV instruction, so it can't constrain it to Base and hence has to add the COPY. Now I just need to find out why it is ignoring the TableGen defined GPRBase for the MOV MI in favor of it's sub class GPR. Thanks. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Ryan Taylor
2009 Dec 07
0
A Gamma-GLM with log link
Hi, I have a set of data (total number of record = 144,122), and I would like to use gamma-glm with log link to set up a model. IC is number of records IL is paid amount The table below shows that I have 30.578% of the data in the level of "1 - 1000" paid amount 20.320% of the data in the level of "1001 - 2000" paid amount and so on My question is could i use the whole data