similar to: CTDB and NFS4

Newbie question! We currently are running a product call TAS from Syntax Corporation and would like to move to Samba. I have review the documentation and cannot find how to set up muliple services on one server. I tried using the Netbios name = and the include statement to bring in another smb.conf file but I don't think I'm on the right track.

All test machines are CentOS 5.5 (RHEL subscriptions purchased). We've had NFS3 storage working fine and decided to try NFS4. We can mount an NFS4 share on our KVM host, but the SELinux file context on the mountpoint directory is magically changed from virt_image_t to nfs_t. Restorecon refuses to change it back. Adding the mount option context=system_u:object_r:virt_image_t on either server

I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has done it before. On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating the client is not an option at

After getting a reasonably configured NFS4 setup working on my Scientific Linux server, I spent a majority of my evening trying to do the same with my Centos 5 box, with fruitless results. Most attempts to mount that server returns the following message: [root at sl01 log]# mount -t nfs4 192.168.15.200:/opt/company_data /mnt mount.nfs4: Operation not permitted As nearest as I can tell, I was

Fedora 13 is using nfs4, and there is a problem in opening files requiring OpenOffice if accessed over an nfs3 mount, so it's time to change. I found a couple of tutorials, and got it *almost* working correctly. This is where I need help. Logwatch tells me /nfs4exports/Data1 and /Data1 have same filehandle for *,192.168.0.0/24,192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0, using first The tutorial I was

HTTPD on some of my CentOS5 systems is configured to run as user "nobody". Also, it needs access to some exported file systems. CentOS5 uses NFS3 so I changed the ownership of the files on the storage server to "nobody" to give httpd full permissions. Now I want to rebuild these systems with CentOS6 and httpd running as user "apache". The problem is how to give

We''re starting to grow our ZFS environment and really need to start standardizing our monitoring procedures. OS tools are great for spot troubleshooting and sar can be used for some trending, but we''d really like to tie this into an SNMP based system that can generate graphs for us (via RRD or other). Whether or not we do this via our standard enterprise monitoring tool or

Am 20.03.2015 um 10:45 schrieb Volker Lendecke: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 05:47:11PM +0100, Robert Schetterer wrote: >>> Well the API is propably just stuffing blobs into extended >>> attributes directly from userspace. That's how most of >>> the NFSv4 ACLs usually get done :-(. >>> >>> Of course all implementations use different blobs containing

Hi everyone We're really struggling with nfs4 <--> windows acls. Scenario Samba4 share --> cifs --> win7. No problem Samba4 share --> nfs4 --> Linux. acls not inherited Neither is there inheritance vica versa. e.g. It is not possible to create files with group rw on a umask 0022 nfs4 share. nfs4_setfacl cannot override umask. Using POSIX or windows acls this works

Hi All, Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP backend for Winbind: RID vs. AD or tag Winbind to a primary CTDB node and point other nodes to authenticate from AD via proxy primary CTDB node? /etc/sysconfig/ctdb on all nodes is as follows:

Hai,   I have strange problem, i think its a simple thing, but im missing some kerberos knowledge here..     Situation.     I login with my pc on the AD domain, (works fine). Now i login on my member server with ssh (putty), using the ssh single sign-on on my server where my homedirs is  ( /home/users/username)  , this works fine.   When i do the same to my print server, where the

Hello, Actually I have some troubels concerning samba (3.0.24) on debian (4.0): I would like to have some samba-shares on a nfs-filesystem. NFS works fine for the Linux clients and the Linux server. The nfs filesystem is mounted from an other server on /home. The next step is to set up samba to have some shares on the nfs Filesystem (/home/$LOGIN, anonymized configuration attached).

Hi, I am setting up ctdb samba, and have hit a brick wall trying to solve the following issue. 1. getent does not retrieve the list of domain users or groups (wbinfo works fine) I'm not sure what I'm missing but I've almost spent the whole day trying to resolve this one and haven't made any progress :-( Any help or suggestions are appreciated My configuration is

I have a system that I'm vetting as a NAS server. It has a 2.0TB XFS filesystem mounted on /storage and I'm doing benchmarks using nfs3, nfs4, and samba. I'm testing via iozone by mounting the filesystem from my "nas client" box and then running iozone on the mounted filesystem. NFS seems pretty fast - ie, several orders of magnitude faster than samba, and I'm

Hi, in the following scenario I've got the Problem of "STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION". Client A (with User 1) copies a file to share X. (with: DENY_NONE 0x120196 WRONLY NONE) Client B (with User 1) reads this file from share X (with: DENY_NONE 0x120089 RDONLY NONE) Now Client C (with User 1) wants also to read this file from share X and gets the STATUS_SHARE_VIOLATION.

Am 19.03.2015 um 17:39 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:16:20AM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > >> Unfortunately I'm not a programmer, so I don't know if there is an API or not. As far as me the user can tell is that we have an NFSv4 filesystem mounted on the linux box. We have tools available through the nfs4-acl-tools package (this is on CentOS 6, for

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:59:47 +0100 > From: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE > To: groucho.64738 at hotmail.com > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] NFS4 ACLs with samba 3 (or 4) > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:17:34PM -0400, Kevin Taylor wrote: > > I know this was discussed a lot a few years ago, but my google searches aren't quite getting me where

Hi All, Well, it <http://goo.gl/hzxyw> was too good to be true. Under extreme, extended IO on a 48core node, some part of the the NFS stack collapses and leads to an IO lockup thru NFS. We've replicated it on 48core and 64 core nodes, but don't know yet whether it acts similarly on lower-core-count nodes. Tho I haven't had time to figure out exactly /how/ it collapses, I

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those

On 2023-04-01 15:13, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 01-04-2023 20:38, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 01/04/2023 19:10, Gary Dale via samba wrote: >> >>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad in the Configuring >>> the ad Back End section. >> >> Yes, but right at the top there is a warning box that says: