similar to: Raising domain functional level Active Directory - samba3x

Greetings! I'm having problems with winbind and interdomain trusts. I've done alot of searching on the topic and there appears to be alot of folk out there with the same problem, but not any solutions. Environment is CentOS v5.6 with yumable samba3x-winbind-3.5.4-0.70 on x86_64. Specifically, the host is joined (successfully) to A: [ehvozda at AD-test samba]$ sudo wbinfo -t checking

Hi, I have setup the Active Directory DS on Windows 2012 R2 server. I am trying to test samba (version 3.6.6) functionalities on this setup. Forest and Domain both Functional Level in the setup is : Windows Server 2012 R2 The question I have is, "What dependencies or functionality constraints samba have on the Forest/Domain Functional Level of Active Directory?" Please let me know if

Hi, I raised the functional level of my Samba 4.19 server with the commands below, the Schema update took a long time but ended successfully, however when raising the functional level with the second command the error below occurred and I was unable to complete the complete process. Can anyone tell me what could have happened or if they have experienced this? 1 - samba-tool domain schemaupgrade

On 1/12/2015 10:47 PM, avinesh saini wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> > wrote: > >> Samba DCs > > Hi, > > Thank you for your responses. > In our setup samba version is 3.6. Can you please let me know if samba 3.6 > supports domain/forest functional levels or if there is any impact, when > samba acts as

Am 09.01.2015 um 14:58 schrieb jacek burghardt: > Samba 4 functions at level of server 2008 as domain controller. Default forest and domain functional level is 2003 native during the provisioning. Supported is 2000 up to including 2008 R2. > I found it imposible to join samba 4 as secondary domain > controller to server 2012. Right. Samba doesn't support all features of the 2012

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0306 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0306.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 0165a47460879890701501a6ba33924a samba3x-3.5.4-0.70.el5_6.1.x86_64.rpm 6e8191de3fcd3ed784857ed439fa5bce samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.70.el5_6.1.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1007 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1007.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: fb86795bd28ea3adb5c2a8319819bd82 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5.x86_64.rpm ab308cb8053a8cf590229d03347da918 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1220 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1220.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: d1af26928e5b3437ed117f2ffbef2cb3 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm 0277d8f285c5006f57ae9f3a50ceb8fc samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.x86_64.rpm

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld at samba.org> wrote: > Samba DCs Hi, Thank you for your responses. In our setup samba version is 3.6. Can you please let me know if samba 3.6 supports domain/forest functional levels or if there is any impact, when samba acts as Domain Controller. Regards, Avinesh

Hi Felipe, Le 25/06/2024 ? 17:14, Felipe Ribeiro de Oliveira via samba a ?crit?: > Hi, I raised the functional level of my Samba 4.19 server with the commands > below, the Schema update took a long time but ended successfully, however > when raising the functional level with the second command the error below > occurred and I was unable to complete the complete process. Can anyone

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:0306 Important Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0306.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: dee206b3a0e56e88ccfd8c312d765af7 samba3x-3.5.4-0.70.el5_6.1.i386.rpm eb9d1d0ae9ac70e6f17d470b7bca4de0 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.70.el5_6.1.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:1007 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1007.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 0b924fc207821b327e4a48e40015c866 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5.i386.rpm 72312ee2509accb48b5ae361297e8943 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2011:1220 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1220.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 155e4c1fd8f4165e83e602cee07f3e68 samba3x-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm cdaf234215185ad93ae0c773edb625e2 samba3x-client-3.5.4-0.83.el5_7.2.i386.rpm

Hi, I raised the functional level of my Samba 4.19 server with the commands below, the Schema update took a long time but ended successfully, however when raising the functional level with the second command the error below occurred and I was unable to complete the complete process. Can anyone tell me what could have happened or if they have experienced this? 1 - samba-tool domain schemaupgrade

On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: > Hi all > About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server > with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. > Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would > normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including > samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and

Hi. We are using samba4 as our production AD for a while in a mixed (XP, win2k3, win7, win2k8) environment. This post: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2011-February/076525.html mentions that to raise the functional level one should use this command: samba-tool domainl evel raise --domain=2008 --forest=2008 but in our current git version this command doesn't work due to the

Hi all About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 server with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a new location. As I would normally do I checked for Centos updates and found 35 outstanding including samba3x 3.6.23-12.el5_11 and samba3x-client, samba3x-common, samba3x-doc, samba3x-domainjoin-gui,

On 06/20/16 15:19, Rowland penny wrote: > On 20/06/16 19:53, Dale Schroeder wrote: >> On 06/17/2016 4:31 PM, peter lawrie wrote: >>> Hi all >>> About 18 months ago I connected 14 new Windows 7 PCs to a Centos5.1 >>> server >>> with samba3x as domain members. There are no other servers on site. >>> Today, I had to visit to connect up a PC in a

Hello Andrew, first let me say it was a pleasure to meet you in G?ttingen at the SambaXP. The discussion about the "DNS" in the evening was very interesting. So, i have asked this question a few weeks before, maybe a entry in the samba wiki would help ;) Regards from Germany Dirk Am 13.06.19 um 18:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 20:48 +0530,

Does raising the domain level need to be done on all DC's running in the Forest or just one? How about the forest level? The wiki makes me believe only one is needed. Will rasing the functional levels prevent any samba4 version from joining the domain? I would like to raise my current 2003 level to 2008 to take advantage of the following features. * Advanced Encryption Standard (AES 128