similar to: FreeBSD/ZFS/S3FS usage and development questions

I have Googled my brains out without success, and I'm hoping that someone here can give me some tips. I'm trying to build a new file server, and I've concluded that ZFS is the technology that I want to use. After doing some research I settled on FreeBSD 10 as the platform to provide it. I have an existing AD domain (two Samba 4.1.4 DCs running on Debian) and the file server will be

It's me again :-) Now we have DDNS with DHCP running but we have a problem on one of our two DCs. Btw we used the setup and the script from wiki. Doing a "dhclient" on a host we are getting the following messages: ------------- Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: Commit: IP: 192.168.0.249 DHCID: 1:50:5b:5d:1c:ab:aa Name: horst Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41 dhcpd[3961]: execute_statement

The DDNS setup from the wiki uses the keytab of the seperate "Unprivileged user for TSIG-GSSAPI DNS updates via ISC DHCP server" you have to Check this one not the one which BIND uses. Regards Am 16.05.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:32:52 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> It's me

Somebody knows if Samba 4.1 supports to join Windows 2012 server as a secondary DC?? Because after compiling samba 4.1 in an ubuntu server i try to join to a Windows 2012 server and get this error: root at samba41:~/compilar/samba-4.1.0# /root/compilar/samba-4.1.0/bin/samba-tool domain join zentyal.it.com DC -Uadministrator --realm=zentyal.it.com Finding a writeable DC for domain

We had used Samba 4 alpha 17 for a long time and want to update our server now to Samba 4.0.x. The old Samba versions was using NTVFS and Samba 4.0.x is now using S3FS by default. So, what is the best practice now? Should we stay on NTVFS or should we switch to S3FS? The global part of our smb.conf looks like this: --- [global] interfaces = eth0 netbios name = PDC

Reading Whatsnew.txt in samba I understand that If I use s3fs, as it is set by default in the provision step, I won't be able to modify GPOs later, right? So I have a couple of questions: - What's the advantage of using s3fs over ntvfs in new installations? - If I'm planning to deploy a new Domain, probably needing to change GPOs later, should I select ntvfs??? Best regards, Felix

Hi, how can I what filer server is currently running in samba4, s3fs or ntvfs? My smb.conf looks like this: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, winbind, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, web dcerpc endpoint servers = epmapper, wkssvc, rpcecho, samr, netlogon, lsarpc, spoolss, drsuapi, dssetup, unixinfo, browser, eventlog6, backupkey, dnsserver Im asking as when looging

Hello! I've just built my first samba4 (4.0.5) on an OpenIndiana machine without any problems. But when it comes to the provision step the problems begin. Everything is fine, if I call samba-tool with the --use-ntvfs option. But I want to use samba4 with s3fs because of the support for newer SMB protocol versions. But when I call samba-tool without --use-ntvfs option I got the following:

Hi How about calling s3fs, s4fs? Cheers, Steve

On Wed, 16 May 2018 12:32:52 +0200 Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > It's me again :-) > Now we have DDNS with DHCP running but we have a problem on one of our > two DCs. Btw we used the setup and the script from wiki. > Doing a "dhclient" on a host we are getting the following messages: > ------------- > Mai 16 12:13:28 samba41

@Rowland The tip with the Server who created the entry was good, but not our problem. We tried it with different hosts on both systems @Christian I know but at some point you try everything ;-) We fixed it the Microsoft-way by rebooting both DCs after the reboot everything was fine :-) Am 16.05.2018 um 12:57 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba: > The DDNS setup from the wiki uses the keytab of

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:26 +0100 "Niels Dettenbach \(Syndicat IT & Internet\) via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and > >sa-based > > If you want to see a working samba / zfs

In samba-tool, sysvolreset has options for either --use-ntvfs or --use-s3fs to set the permissions appropriately However, sysvolcheck does not have the same capability, and always attempts to verify in s3 vfs. Is this a known limitation in Samba 4.0.0 ?

I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and sa-based xattrs. For the record, the latest version of samba that I've been successfully able to compile on FreeBSD 10.3 is Samba 4.5.5. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:17:07 +0100 > Klaus Hartnegg via samba <samba at

I have an existing install of Samba4 ( I think beta6 vintage ), which uses ntvfs and bind9. It's only providing AD and Group Policy. I have a seperate file server running 3.6.x. I want to add a server to the domain running the most recent RC. I know they are using internal by default and s3fs for the file shares on sysvol. Can s3fs coexist with ntvfs? Can the internal DNS coexist with

On 01/12/2014 14:17, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 01/12/14 11:55, Silvio Giunge Silva a.k.a kanazuchi wrote: >> So, >> to provision samba4 i need of the samba-tool and it's not working.I >> use poudriere to generate packages on FreeBSD, and the recursive >> packages too. >> I'm trying to discovery what lib that samba-tool needs ti import the >> lib

Hello list- When attempting to upgrade Samba from 4.1.4 to 4.1.6 on a FreeBSD 9.2 x86 machine, an error message is produced: [3554/3754] Linking default/source3/lib/netapi/examples/user/user_modalsget [3555/3754] Linking default/source4/utils/ntlm_auth4 /usr/local/lib/libsamdb.so: undefined reference to `sam_rid_crypt at SAMBA_4.1.4' /usr/local/lib/libsamba-credentials.so: undefined

!!! Regards Is it possible to install samba4 from ubuntu 16.04 repository as a domain controller? I tried, but I'm having trouble with the sysvol folder ACLs. I can authenticate with smbclient however when I try to access from windows with the same user, I get permission denied # smbclient //localhost/sysvol -UAdministrator -c 'ls' Enter Administrator's password:

On 6/3/2015 11:43 AM, Ryan Ashley wrote: > James, I cloned it using git. I installed it to a private partition > (/samba) back when I was first testing Samba4. It is in the path and > this worked for ages, but recently just stopped. No errors, no warnings, > nothing. Just dead. > > The GP in question is the default domain policy. I already tried > unlinking it and it fails on

My log files are full of crap about cups errors, despite smb4.conf explicitly stating not to load printers, and stating not to use cups in any case. Feb 27 16:32:38 arabian winbindd[1321]: [2014/02/27 16:32:38.591648, 0] ../source3/winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:3196(initialize_winbindd_cache) Feb 27 16:32:38 arabian winbindd[1321]: initialize_winbindd_cache: clearing cache and re-creating with