Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "msdfs & full_audit issues"
2011 Jun 10
1
known incompatibility with msdfs and vfs full_audit combination?
Hi all,
I'm running debian 6, x64, stock samba 3.5.6, various clients.
As soon as I enable the full_audit vfs object in smb.conf, my msdfs
links stop working with:
- INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11
and
- failed to get vfs_handle->data!
in the samba logfiles.
Is there a known problem with this combination? I'm guessing that this
combination is supposed to work..?
I have a level 10 log
2010 Jun 15
1
Logging file creation with full_audit
I'm trying to set up a samba server to audit only the file operations
that I care about, which are create, modify, delete, and rename (for
files and folders). I've got the full_audit vfs module working well,
except that I haven't been able to figure out what to set it to log (in
the "full_audit:success" setting) to include file creation and
modification. If I log
2010 Nov 29
0
VFS full_audit sending spurious messages to syslog?
Hi,
I'm currently running Samba 3.0.22 (on an Ubuntu 6.06 [Dapper] server).
I have VFS full_audit set up successfully to log user activity using the
LOCAL6 facility.
I also have syslog configured to redirect all messages from this
facility to /var/log/samba/log.audit
This is working fine. However, I've recently been getting lines in
/var/log/syslog that look like they're coming
2023 Mar 10
1
full_audit syslog logging question
Running Samba 4.16.4 and having problems getting the vfs_full_audit module to send anything to syslog. I can get it to log to a file, but nothing happens when using syslog only.
Configuration looks like:
[global]
...
log level = 4
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
logging = syslog at 4
...
[foobar]
path = /foobar
vfs objects = full_audit streams_xattr acl_xattr
full_audit:priority = INFO
2009 Mar 20
1
vfs full_audit panic
Folks,
I tried using full_audit on Samba 3.0.28 by putting the following
lines on smb.conf (global section):
vfs objects = full_audit
full_audit:facility = LOCAL2
full_audit:priority = WARN
full_audit:prefix = %u|%m|%S
full_audit:success = rename rmdir unlink write
full_audit:failure = none
My log says:
Dec 29 13:57:07 lua smbd_audit: [2008/12/29 13:57:07, 0]
lib/fault.c:fault_report(45)
Dec
2023 Mar 13
1
full_audit syslog logging question
In case anyone is interested, I found the problem.
I was running samba in a container that did not have any syslog service (rsyslogd or syslog-ng) running. By default, samba syslog only sends messages to the system's syslog socket and there was nothing listening on it so the messages just got dropped. I put rsyslogd in the container and configured it to listen on the syslog socket and am
2020 Nov 05
0
No Logging for most VFS Operations with full_audit on smbd 4.9.5-Debian
Greetings,
I am running audits on a restricted file share for smbd 4.9.5-Debian. Messages go to syslog via local5. I am mostly interested in file access and modification, plus the occasional failed connect. The only operations that yield any results appear to be 'opendir' and 'open'. Unfortunately, 'open' is chatty to an extend as to render logging useless. I am getting
2015 Jan 04
2
A lot of messages in full_audit log
Hi,
I'm using full_audit vfs module and I'm seeing a lot of duplicated messages
in log file. Why does it happens ?
How can I configure de smb.conf not to log duplicated information ?
Duplicated log:
Jan 4 13:27:50 server smbd_audit: [2015/01/04
13:27:50|semirames|samba-admin|192.168.0.3|setores]|pread|ok|Atendimento/James.txt
Jan 4 13:27:50 server smbd_audit: [2015/01/04
2007 Aug 03
1
full_audit on Samba 3.0.20 vs 3.0.25
Hi List,
Just a quick question for you: Does Samba 3.0.20 support the full_audit
module? I've got the module operating on two boxes, one with Samba
3.0.25 and the other with 3.0.20, and only the former seems to interpret
VFS directives, such as:
full_audit:prefix = %u
full_audit:failure = none
full_audit:success = open write close
On the 3.0.20 box, they seem to be ignored,
2020 Apr 02
2
Samba 4.12 python3 and vfs object full_audit (centos7)
Hallo,
I?m using samba 4.11 from sernet and the vfs object full_audit.
After update samba to 4.12 from sernet full_audit is broken and the shares with full_audit are not accessible.
Can anyone tell me please how to install python 3 on centos7 while the Centos system needs python 2 but samba sould use python3?
Thanks in advance,
Peter
2009 Dec 09
1
VFS full_audit problem
Hi all,
I had implemented on one of my shares vfs full_audit module. It was
working with Samba 3.0.x without any problems.
After migration to Samba 3.4.3 this function doesn't work anymore - when
it's enabled then share isn't accessible from users (it's visible but
getting error when trying to connect to it).
Audit and extd_audit vfs's are working fine, but they
2020 Apr 16
0
Crash after Update to 4.12.1 with vfs full_audit
Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different
than this:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html
Regards
Christian
Am 16.04.20 um 13:45 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba:
> Hello alAl,
> after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the
> vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs
> from the
2010 Jan 13
1
Full_Audit preventing file writing
When VFS full_audit is activated the server doesn't allow users to write
changes in any file.
The log vfs:10 shows:
Jan 12 22:22:00 loginserver smbd_audit:
aaaa.bbbb|192.168.23.10|get_real_filename|fail (Operation not
supported)|/Novo
Documento de Texto.txt->(null)
Jan 12 22:22:00 loginserver smbd_audit:
aaaa.bbbb|192.168.23.10|fchmod_acl|fail
(No data available)|Novo Documento de
2010 Oct 06
0
full_audit troubles
Hello.
I had a FreeBSD 7 box with Samba 3.0.x and I upgraded to 3.4.8.
Everything seemed to be working fine, until I discovered that, at
logoff, roaming profiles could not be copied back to the server: the
client side error translates to "Insufficient resources". I've verified
that on XP clients.
A quick search pointed to full_audit, so I tried disabling it and
everything
2023 Aug 24
0
Samba recycle bin excludedir doesn't work for me
Hello,
I'm testing the "recycle: excludedir" option of Samba recycle bin but
for some reason every deleted file is sent to the recycle bin, even
those in excluded paths. Using samba/focal-updates,now
2:4.15.13+dfsg-0ubuntu0.20.04.4.
This is the config for that share:
---
[SHARE1]
??? path = /isp/SHARE1
??? browseable = no
??? force create mode = 0660
??? force directory
2020 Apr 16
4
Crash after Update to 4.12.1 with vfs full_audit
Hello alAl,
after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the
vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before. Logs
from the crash see here:
.0.31:445]
Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: [2020/04/16 13:36:47.546559,
0] ../../source3/lib/util.c:830(smb_panic_s3)
Apr 16 13:36:47 lx-sv-03 smbd_audit[6263]: PANIC (pid 6263):
vfs_full_audit.c: name table
2020 Apr 16
1
Crash after Update to 4.12.1 with vfs full_audit
On 16/04/2020 13:15, Christian Naumer via samba wrote:
> Forgot to mention that this is on Centos 8. So maybe something different
> than this:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/samba/msg163085.html
>
Is python3 standard or available for Centos 8 ?
Not sure if python is used here though.
Rowland
2020 Apr 16
0
Crash after Update to 4.12.1 with vfs full_audit
Am 16.04.20 um 14:23 schrieb Christian Naumer via samba:
> Am 16.04.20 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
>> On 16/04/2020 12:45, Christian Naumer via samba wrote:
>>> Hello alAl,
>>> after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the
>>> vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before.
>>
>> The only change
2020 Apr 16
3
Crash after Update to 4.12.1 with vfs full_audit
Am 16.04.20 um 14:18 schrieb Rowland penny via samba:
> On 16/04/2020 12:45, Christian Naumer via samba wrote:
>> Hello alAl,
>> after update of our test server to 4.12.1 from 4.11 it crashes. If the
>> vfs module is removed from the config everthing works as before.
>
> The only change was to upgrade to 4.12.1 ?
>
> If there were no other changes, then Samba
2016 Jun 21
0
Problem handling excel 2010 files
Hi everyone,
I've recently migrated a file server/domain controller from a Windows 2012 Server to CentOS 7.2 with Samba 4.2.13 running on active directory role mode , everything is working fine except when handling Excel files, when you try to open a file it locks in read-only mode and there is no users accessing the file , anyway you can edit normally if you click on "Notify"