similar to: Samba 4 DC - File locking problems when a client crashes

Hi, I'm using samba version 3.0.37 and i encountered a very strange and annoying phenomena when 2 different users from 2 different machines are getting the same PID from samba. (2 windows users that are trying to view documents on the CIFS share). I did some google research on this problem and i found the following regarding such a problem: " One can find references to problems like

Hi, I have one NAS which I can access via NFS or Samba. This storage is accessed by 2 linux servers with Samba where I re-export the NAS share. This is sort of an active/active loadbalancing cluster. The only thing not working is locking... If a client opens a Word-File via server1 and another opens the same via server2 it won't inform the user that he can only open the file readonly. I was

Hi Experts, When copying a big file from Windows to a Samba share working with the normal TDB mode rather than CTDB mode, the Windows client disconnected from the network ungracefully such as cable unplugging or network disabling. Then, try to delete the partial transferred file from another client, we will be prompted that another program is using this file. The lock can be easily observed by

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 01:08:31PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:05:44PM +0100, Markus Doits wrote: > > > > On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > > > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > > > > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > > > > > unix extensions

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

On 23.01.15 19:57, Miguel Medalha wrote: > I am using Samba 4.1.16 with smb2/3 and symbolic links are working alright. > > Following the smb.conf man page, I use: > > unix extensions = no > wide links = yes > > Unfortunately this still does not work for me - can you really make a symbolic link ("ln -s ...") when you are connected with smb2/3? Does

Hello, I'm using Samba 4.0.5 in Debian Wheezy as a member server of a DC (in Debian Wheezy too with Samba 4.0.5) and the clients are Windows7 Pro. The users use shares in the member server. Sometimes, after the logoff of the users in the Win7 clients, there are connections with the member server whiches never stop. I can see it with the "smbstatus" command which point PID out to me

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi Volker and the list > > Yesterday the problem appeared again > > I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on > and this is the result > > [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 > Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit > 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW,

Hello, I'm using the latest git 4.2.0 samba version (4.2.0rc4-GIT-93b73bf, to get latest vfs_fruit module). I noticed the following strange behavior with OSX clients (10.10.1, 10.10.2 beta): When they connect using either smb 3.0 or 2.1 (verified on the server with `smbstatus` and the `version` column `SMB3_00` or `SMB2_10` respectively), symbolic links pointing at non existent files are not

Hi all, This question has come up many times before in a number of guises. But I do not believe that it has ever been answered satisfactorily. This may well reflect fundamental difficulties in the CIFS protocol However, recent incarnations of Windows Server seem to handle the problem better possibly due to tweaks in the underlying TCP/IP stack vis-a-vis Linux. At the end of the day, a

I'm running Samba 4.0.7 on CentOS 6.4 running double duty as DC and file server. OS X clients are taking a _long_ time to list long directories. One directory with 10K entries is taking 3-4 minutes to display the entries in Finder. I captured a few seconds worth of packets and noticed that it's doing three requests per file: 1. NTCreateAndX - just opens the file 2. Close 3. FIND_FIRST2 -

I am running a Samba Box as a Domain Member in a Windows ADS Domain (Windows Server 2003). The Box has joined the ADS domain and the kerberos authentication works, I can see "smbd" processes running with AD user accounts. But I can not set ACLs on the directories or the files located on the share. If I change them using Windows Explorer, they either will be ignored by samba, or I get the

Hello, maybe there is someone they can help and answer a question why i get these network screen on my ctdb clusters. I have two ctdb clusters. One physical and one in a vmware enviroment. So when i transfer any files (copy) in a samba share so i get such network curves with performance breaks. I dont see that the transfer will stop but why is that so? can i change anything or does anybody know

Hai, maybe it's a bit early to ask, but is there a date when 3.2.2 wil be released. thanx. Louis

I am trying to set up a caching link between two points, that can be shared with windows and *nix. In both locations, I have linux-based servers with data, which have caching NFS mounts (that is, mount -t nfs -o fsc, with cachefilesd). These mounts are working correctly and I have tested the cache locally to much success. What I have not been able to get working is sharing those mounts with

I'm using the Yocto Project to build an embedded distro, to which I'm adding Samba 3.6 from OpenEmbedded. Doing so increases my root file system from about 63MB to 175MB. I seem to be building a large Samba server with a small ancillary operating system tacked onto it. I listed the files in my file system image, and see that lots of the commands are quite large. I understand that Samba 4

I'm running a PDC on Samba 3.60. Just freshly upgraded it from Samba 3.028a with the purpose of supporting Windows 7. However though all the existing users and computers are running fine, I'm stumped trying to join a new Windows 7 machine to it. I have applied the DomainCompatibility registry fix. When I try to join a Windows 7 workstation I will get this message : The join operation

Hello, Can someone help me to track down the source of this problem? I'm trying to access a file server running on a Belkin modem with an attached USB drive. Judging my the quality of the firmware on the device, I'd say there's a good chance of it being buggy. But it works well enough on a Windows machine, even one running inside Virtualbox under Linux. I therefore see no reason

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 01:38:26PM +0100, Nacho del Rey wrote: > Hi again Volker (& list) > > I think I am very closer of the problem. Sorry, but without access to this system I can't really say what is going on. Please talk to Oracle for support. Samba is running fine on a huge variety of file systems, and if ACFS gives you locking issues, I would request Oracle to fix their

My name is Kenji Ichinoseki and I am in charge of a project at Sumitomo Electric Networks, Inc. Please give me cooperation by all means about the affair in the account of a title. Now, I included "Samba 3.0.37" in the Linux system currently developed (us). And it is testing using "smbtorture(samba3.5.8 source4) ". The point in question was found in our entry of this test. It