similar to: Samba 4.0.13 on FreeBSD 9

Hello all, It''s my first letter on this list, and, my English is not very well. Please take me indulgence for grammar/syntax and over erorrs :)) I have trouble for acl''s of ip range. But, acl for one host (with ip adress) work fine. Please help me for make work acl/find erorr in acl. Becouse I''m new shorewall user, I maked test configuration on Virtual Mashine

Hello list! When em0 has an inet address while bridge0 doesn't, it seems to be OK: ----- bs1% uname -a FreeBSD bs1.sp34.ru 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Sun May 25 20:15:26 MSD 2008 root@bs1.sp34.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSM i386 bs1% ifconfig em0; ifconfig tap0; ifconfig bridge0 em0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500

Hello, My server is experiencing occasional kernel panics when under moderate load. I'm attaching a crash dump and the dmesg output. I'm not sure how to read the kernel backtrace but it looks like the Intel NIC (em0) caused the problem. Occasionally, I used to get a "em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting" error message, but I never had a kernel panic. The problem started last

greetings list. am serving SMB using the samba-3.0.24 package on an openbsd 4.1-release machine and am seeing really low throughput from the server, even when both the server and client are on gigabit ethernet. the maximum throughput i've been able to attain is ~6 MBps, which is pretty slow, both on 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps segments. this top speed is identical on both 100 Mbps and 1 Gbps.

Hi, I noticed that network connection of one of my boxes got significantly slow just after upgrading it to 8.0R. The box has an em0 (82547EI) and worked fine with 7.2R. The symptoms are: - A ping to a host on the same LAN takes 990ms RTT, it reduces gradually to around 1ms, and then it returns to around 1s. The rate was about 2ms/ping. - The response is quite slow, but no packet

Hi all, I moved from 8.0-RELEASE to last week's -STABLE: $ uname -v FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #0: Thu Sep 2 16:38:02 SAST 2010 root@XXXXX:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC and all seems well except my network card is unusable. On boot up: em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.0.5> port 0x3040-0x305f mem 0xe3200000-0xe321ffff,0xe3220000-0xe3220fff irq 10 at device 25.0 on pci0 em0: Setup

Updated my Athlon-xp 6-stable system last night, got an em watchdog timeout for the first time a few hours later, during a fairly high-traffic period. System is UP but does have device apic in the config. Any chance this is the recent race condition? Workaround? ifconfig em0 down, ifconfig em0 up seemed to cure it, at least for the moment. Thanks, Barney Wolff -- Barney Wolff I never

I am getting these messages every 30 seconds or so. I searched around and found a few other post about this problem with other devices, but no answers to the problem. I didn't notice any of these message until I upgrade to 4.8-RELEASE the other day. This is a dual processor machine. It happens on all my machines that have em devices, which all happen to be dual processor machines. I

TEQL and Subnet problem I have a network topology shown below, and I am trying to use TEQL. P1, P2 and P3 are three linux machines, and each has two network cards. P2 and P3 are connected in two ways: (1) directed connection between P2.eth0 and P3.eth0; (2) connection via P1. P1 acts as the gateway. TEQL is installed on P2 and P3 to load-balance packet transmission by round-robin sending packets

Hi, I have a server at Hetzner and something strange happend. First, I installed FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 (amd64) via their FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE rescue system, that's ok. I had to configure the network by using the em driver -> em0 interface. But suddenly, the network was lost. After an ACPI reboot, nothing. Going to the vKVM show me the system didn't detected em0 anymore but an nVidia

Ruby on Rails Developer required at The Floow, an exciting new telematics company that is rapidly expanding (see us here: www.thefloow.com). The role would involve working within a small Agile team, alongside really smart people and an expert Ruby team. Our office is relaxed and friendly, with excellent team support and has a strong emphasis on quality. The role involves working with Big

Hello, i'm experiencing periodic kernel panics on a server with FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Tue May 20 19:09:43 CEST 2008. My big problem is that the system is not performing memory dumping and/or automatic reoboot, it just stays there. Here' console output: em0: watchdog timeout -- resetting kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0;

Hello, I have a server pfsense in bridge mode to function as transparent FW, the problem is that once I connect the pfsense between my router core and my core switch catalyst a few seconds begin to appear several messages like these: em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting em2: watchdog timeout - resetting And the connection falls

Hi. I have problem with installation XCP and XenServer on DomU. Installation just stuck after a while from installation beginning. DomU just stop responding, even reconnect with vncviewer isn''t possible. I''m using iso images to install. Dom0 is kernel 3.6-rc7 with xen 4.2.1-pre. I''m having such log: -videoram option does not work with cirrus vga device model. Videoram

Why does a vlan created against em0 have a mtu of 1496. This is on 4.8-STABLE (cvsup'd this afternoon). Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca |

Hi, I'm afraid about having find a freebsd 5X security issue. We have recently upgraded one gateway from 4.10 to 5.3... Following network used: [ISP]--xl1--[FW01]-----xl0--em0--[SR01] | |--fxp0--em0--[SR02] On fw01, we have one jail. So fw01 is configured as a bridge on xl1,xl0,fxp0. Services works (before and after upgrade). On 4.10, we used

Hello Community ! I debugged smbclient because smbtar don't work for me anymore (Segmentation fault) I run Fedora9 (kernel 2.6.25.6-55.fc9.x86_64) with samba-3.2.0-1.rc1 (test with samba-3.2.0-1.rc2 too) when i run /usr/bin/smbclient -d 3 //server/elisa -U administrator i get as follow .... root:machine /root>/usr/bin/smbclient -d 3 //server/elisa -U administrator lp_load_ex:

On a rather full customer web server, I am trying to track down whose web site script is trying to make outbound network connections when they should not be. In /etc/security/audit_control, I added to the flags line dir:/var/audit flags:lo,aa,-nt minfree:5 to log failed network connection. When I try an make an outbound connection to something that is blocked in pf, it seems to sometimes work.

I am attempting to join my server to a samba 3.4 domain, and having a few issues. The error it keeps returning is "NT_STATUS_END_OF_FILE" when i attempt to use the net rpc join command. Find my debug output from the command, as well as the serves SMB.conf attached smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CHOCOLATE server string = Nemo netbios name = nemo

Hi everyone, THis is my second thread regarding the issue.(before I was having problems with accessing my email, which slow down my responses, sorry for that) My setup looks like this Firewall | | Asterisk---Asterisk (two asterisk servers with the same setup for high avail) | | phones Ports 5060, 10000-20000, 4569, 5036 are forwared to 192.168.1.251 which is virtual ip address on one of the