similar to: Oplock break failed for file XXX-- replying anyway?

Hello, I would like to how to do to kill the locked files from a useraccount by multiple smbd pids automatically when the session is closed? #### Details Samba server: Release: 5.10 Kernel architecture: sun4u Application architecture: sparc Hardware provider: Sun_Microsystems Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_142909-17 Samba version: Samba version 3.5.6 Smb.conf file section Global: #

I help an NT admin that has recently added a redhat 8.0 based samba server to his network. the share is one that is a core service for the operation of the business and has about 50 users constantly accessing data from several accounting and tax preparation applications. One of the primary applications requires update farily recently as of late and the admin is having problems getting all files

I noticed one of my smbd processes for one particular client (IUSR_JUNIPER) is taking 200MB in memory, far different from all the other smbd processes. Should I be concerned about a memory leak here? I don't think samba would be caching any files, so I can't see why it'd use this much memory. That windows client is a win2k IIS5 server, with well over 60 sites that are hosted off a

hello, can anybody explain or point me to a document that explain the locked files section produced by smbstatus -L (see below). what means denymode ? access ? what means exclusive+batch in the oplock section ? can anybody point me to a document explaining the way file locking works ? regards # smbstatus -L Locked files: Pid DenyMode Access R/W Oplock Name

I first asked this question at the end of October, got a response which didn't solve the problem, and have finally got back to the issue now. I'm running 2.2.7a, recently upgraded from 2.2.0 as Domain Logons for Win2K were suspected to be part of my problem. Anyway, the issue relates to AutoCAD (actually a vertical product called Land3) and a command which works with winXX boxes, but

We are having some problems in our company's test group that did not exist when our Clearcase 2003.06 server existed on a Solaris 8 machine. Now we are running on RHEL 5.2 with Clearcase 7.0.1.3 with Samba 3.0.28 (despite the fact that IBM has only blessed up to 3.0.24) and running into some file locking issues with some scripts our test group runs. I am hoping that someone might have some

Hi list, recently upgraded from 3.0.10 to 3.0.21a on debian sarge. Congratulations guy 's many problems gone but .......... a) a couple of users reported the following: If they open outlook for the first time they are not able to send/receive emails. If they close/open oulook the second time everything is fine. I 'd set a high debug level and observed the log but nothing that will

Server is PII-350MHz/256 MB RAM, hardware mirrored high speed SCSI disks. Installed is SuSE 8.2 with Samba 2.2.8a RPM, XFS filesystems and LPRng as printservices. Server acts as PDC and WINS server. Clients are W2K SP2 (a few with SP3). There are +/- 100 clients. We see a server that is 100% busy and we see during a long time a very high CPU load (60- 95%) related to one W2K client. When

Dear all, I would need some help if we?re running in issues ?cause a wrong configuration of our shares, or it?s a bug in samba 4.12 On samba 4.11 we have no issues with our network shares when Windows Clients connect them. After upgrade to 4.12 we run in to the issue that network shares which are mounted as drives per gpo not working well, We get on windows when we try to open the network drive

I'm running a samba pdc on my gentoo box in a mixed environment with a couple of Windows XP clients and only a few MacOSX clients. The users told me, the file locking across the platforms does not work properly sometimes. I tried to google my problem, but without luck. I switched all the flags related the lock mechanism of samba on and off, but the problem seems to be solved yet. The only

Hi, We have 5 Samba domain controllers, and 4 file servers. All are 4.2.10-Debian. Our file servers have been working fine until recently (on the 26th), when suddenly access to the \\users.store.example.com\user share (hostname p-cats) became extremely slow. Access to other shares on other machines is fine, and users is 128G total (smaller than other shares). The machine isn't under

A couple of years ago (in 2008, using R 2.7.x, I believe) I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run configure like this:

A couple of years ago I noted that using the configure switch --enable-R-shlib when buildig R made configure ignore any specified external LAPACK library (I cannot recall if also the BLAS specification was ignored) and use the internal one insted. I asked why, and was told it was intentional. Now, with R 2.15.1, I see that it at least appears that this is no longer the case. I've run

Hello I use a new samba server with LDAP support as PDC for some Windows2000 and WindowsXP machines. All is working nice. The useer can login with a user/password in the domain, we have remote profiles, the user can access the samba shares and print etc. But after some time (< 1 day) we get a smbstatus output like the attached file. Users are connected multiple times with the same share

This question isn't directly Samba related, but Samba has helped me figure out part of the problem. When I CreateFile on an existing file like so: CreateFile(FileName, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_DELETE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL, NULL); Samba shows that I have the file opened with this type of lock DENY_NONE 0x20089 RDONLY When the file is locked in

On Sat, 2015-09-05 at 11:53 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > >> > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at

We have a central samba file share for our designers (who all use OSX boxes, and mostly use Macromedia products) to work off of. I've lately been able to track down a lot of application quirks (mostly problems with errors when saving, about files being locked) to the Mac resource fork files being indefinitely locked. Here's a sample from a `smbstatus` 14853 DENY_NONE 0x1

Hi Volker and the list Yesterday the problem appeared again I could launch a strace command over a samba PID to see what was going on and this is the result [PRO] [root at pf3il0024 ~]# strace -frp 57686 Process 57686 attached - interrupt to quit 0.000000 fcntl(14, F_SETLKW, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=35824, len=1} It seems the process was trying to get a read-lock but no one

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts > on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give > much explanations about configure options. > As I am not sure if mine is

On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Martyn Plummer <plummerm at iarc.fr> wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: >> > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at >> > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation