Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "BIND9_DLZ and Reverse Lookups"
2014 Dec 30
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Hello rowland,
>
> hang on a bit, the Debian link is for bind 9.8.x and the dlz reference
> is for 9.8.1.dfsg-1.
>
I don?t recomend to use Bind 9.8.1 / 9.8.2 anymore - most distro use it but the shuold move due DLZ compile & bind bugs.
and 9.8 soon goes on end of Life see https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01211/81/BIND-9.8.8-Release-Notes.html
> Rowland
>
This just
2014 Aug 10
1
samba4 internal dns Server ddns for the reverse lookup Zone
Hi everybody,
According to my ddns denied problem with bind dlz zone i tried the internal dns server from samba4. The forward lookup zone is still working correctly and do ddns updates for my win7 Client. But when i create the reverse zone with the windows remote admin tools and restart samba4 the ddns isn't working for the reverse zone. No ip adresses will be added. How can i configure
2014 May 03
3
CentOS 6, BIND_DLZ and kinit errors (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)
It seems like the BIND 9.8 that ships with CentOS 6.x (and probably RHEL
6.x) is not built with --with-dlopen option.
Platform: CentOS 6.5
BIND 9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.23.rc1.el6_5.1
Error seen:
RuntimeError: kinit for HOSTNAME$EXAMPLE.COM failed (Cannot contact any
KDC for requested realm)
Background:
Trying to setup Samba 4 using an existing install of BIND 9.8 as the DNS
backend. However,
2014 Dec 29
5
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Roland,
and here we have one reasons / prove regarding Debian and current Samba BIND DLZ issues :
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/b/bind9/bind9_9.8.4.dfsg.P1-6+nmu2+deb7u3_changelog
MSG >> " * disable dlz until we get a patch to make it build again"
Well Debian Maintainers seems seeking missing the dlz patches that RHEL & SLES maintainers created
2020 Apr 05
4
FMSO transfer gone wrong
On 4/5/20 7:14 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 05/04/2020 17:47, Arne Zachlod via samba wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm currently in the process of updating our Samba environment from
>> 4.3 to 4.11. Looks like I did something wrong. Some pointers would be
>> much appreciated.
>>
>> Since I wanted to migrate from Ubuntu to Debian anyway, I
2018 Jul 31
3
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
> So, you are using Samba without problem, it is just that when you try
> to use Bind9 instead of the internal dns server, your problems start.
>
> Let's just recap
>
> You have run 'samba_upgradedns'
> You have altered smb.conf
> You have configured 'named.conf' correctly
> The Samba 'named.conf' file is readable by 'named' (this
2016 Mar 29
2
Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058)
I'm not an expert in idmap (at all in fact :p) but I thought idmap stuffs
were here to replace RFC2307 UID/GID declared into AD/LDAP objects.
In others words, if you configure correctly idmap into smb.conf I expect
you don't need any more declaring UID/GID for machine accounts.
Anyway here my machines get access to their GPO: I tested one computer's
GPO this morning, the one giving
2014 Dec 29
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Hello ,
review bind9 options ...
>> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: starting BIND 9.9.5-7-Debian -u
>> bind -4
>> Dec 22 12:25:55 verdandi named[18534]: built with '--prefix=/usr'
>> '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--infodir=/usr/share/info'
>> '--sysconfdir=/etc/bind' '--localstatedir=/var' '--enable-threads'
2015 Jan 28
1
[SOLVED] samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Last month I struggled with a severe DLZ issue and today I could solve
it. Credits for the important idea go to Peter Serbe, thanks!
I checked the DNS contents using RSAT. There was nothing wrong with SOA
nor NS entries, but the reverse zones were actually forward zones with
proper names in the in-addr.arpa. domain. I built proper reverse zones
and deleted the forward-reverse zones and Bind
2019 Jan 22
4
Samba BIND9_DLZ autoupdate PTR
Set auth-nxdomain yes;
And stop/start bind9
Other source :
https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/
/snap
The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for
Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows
dynamic
2016 Mar 29
3
Permission denied on GPT.ini (Event ID 1058)
To see which DC is used by Windows client: open a MSDOS console, type
"set", look for LOGONSERVER=\\<your_dc>
<your_dc> is the DC used to connect on.
If issue comes from one DC I would have on sysvol synchronisation between
DC, ACL on all sysvol, DNS entries (but I don't think that's a DNS issue if
you have only GPO issue).
2016-03-29 14:51 GMT+02:00 Sébastien Le
2014 Dec 29
2
samba_dlz Failed to configure reverse zone
Dear Rowland ,
Just keep in mind that the Debian RPI maintated by rasperry.org PI fellows and _not_ mainly by the Mainsteam debian
pkg maintainers, and ways behind the main distro - allmost.
>
> Even though there is no mention of dlopen, samba_dlz works.
>
yes/no ->> its not displaying the DLZ file open <<- and that happen even on my now +1J old samba4.0 RPI samba4 ad.
2012 Apr 02
3
Samba4 how to get a reverse dlz zone
Hi
I have s4 with bind9 working fine. I see that it sets up a forward zone
without using zone files (is that the dlz bit?)
Is it possible to get it to produce a reverse zone?
Thanks,
Steve pp lcb
2018 Jun 30
3
BIND9_DLZ: TKEY is unacceptable - depending on the name server
Dear Samba experts,
Since a couple of days I am trying to fix my domain.
I have each two ADDCs on raspis on two sites. One is running on Raspian and works fine. The other three are on Gentoo and something is broken there.
When I point the name resolution in resolv.conf to the Raspian machine the dynamic updates are just working fine:
# horus /srv/samba/demoshare # samba_dnsupdate --verbose
2017 Dec 13
2
samba 4.7.3 DLZ performance regression
Hello,
I'm seeing a huge performance regression with Samba 4.7.3 DLZ and BIND
9.8.2rc1-RedHat-9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.4. If I remove DLZ external DNS
requests are a few ms. If it is enabled then internal and external DNS
requests are a 1-3 seconds or timeout. Downgrading BIND had no effect.
I reverted just the DLZ modules back to 4.7.0 and performance is back to
normal:
# cp
2014 Jan 14
3
krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm
Hello,
I download krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm<http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm>from
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/.
In Cenos 6.5, I use following instructions:
rpm -i krb5-1.10.3-10.el6_4.6.src.rpm
rpmbuild -ba /home/mockbuild/rpmbuild/SPECS/krb5.spec
The RPMs that has been
2018 Jul 30
4
Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ
It is part of the Sernet packages and is currently on 1.3.4
/usr/lib64/samba/libldb.so.1.3.4
We started using sernet-samba-ad from v4 using the internal dns and updated
as versions were released. We have now recently updated from 4.8.2 to 4.8.3
and still using internal dns.
Our DNS is working as it should, it's only been since recently that we have
to migrate to bind9.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018
2013 Jun 07
2
samba4+bind on centos
Hi all
I've given up on the idea that I can make a script to import our
<domain>-zone into samba internal dns with samba-tool as it gets really
messy with subdomains. Instead I'm now trying to get samba4 to let bind
handle the <domain>-zone as well als dynamic updates and such.
The problem is that once I've started named and samba4 after
provisioning, I try to test
2018 Oct 16
3
Samba AD DC + external DHCP + BIND9_DLZ dynamic dns updates doesn't work for domain members.
W dniu wto, 16.10.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0100, użytkownik Rowland Penny via
samba napisał:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:30 +0200
> "Zuzanna K. Filutowska via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I have a setup with samba acting as active directory domain
> > controller, DNS updates are done via bind DLZ. I have
2017 Apr 12
2
BIND DNS Reverse Update
Hello,
on my Samba AD with BIND DLZ backend it looks like Reverse Updates did
not work.
dig winclient.example.com resolve an IP
dig -x IP does not resolve the hostname
In the bind log I see
client 192.168.30.148#57598: update 'example.com/IN' denied
my named.conf
// This is the primary configuration file for the BIND DNS server named.
//
// Please read