similar to: force samba4 DC not to add all interfaces IP's to DNS?

Hi I am trying to migrate an old printserver from one samba4 (4.8.11 on CentOS-6) server to a newer one (4.11.2 on CentOS-8) using net rpc printer migrate all The migration of queue, forms, securitty, settings works, during the migration of the drivers (net rpc printer migrate drivers)? the command dumps core at the first driver Here a level10 output ???? spoolss_AddPrinterDriver: struct

Hi fellow list users, I'm setting up a 4.0.3 DC and I am observing the following issue: - nsswitch.conf contains winbind for passwd and group - provisioned with use_rfc2307 - creating user with ADUC - creating group - adding Unix Attributes to user and group - 1st part of issue: ADUC throws error message (translated from German XP: "The object properties of the object could not be

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, What would be the recommended way to remove an old offline DC from Samba4? I searched in samba-tool for a way to do this, but didn't find any. Tried using the Windows tools to manage AD Users & Computers -> Domain Controllers -> The DC & then hit delete, however this gives an error 'cannot find specified module'.

Hi can you post your /etc/krb5.conf Regards Hansjörg -- Dr. Hansjörg Maurer itsystems Deutschland AG Erzgießereistr. 22 80335 München Tel: +49-89-52 04 68-41 Fax: +49-89-52 04 68-59 E-Mail: hansjoerg.maurer at itsd.de Web: http://www.itsd.de Amtsgericht München HRB 132146 USt-IdNr. DE 812991301 Steuer-Nr. 143/100/81575 Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Stefan Adam Vorstand: Dr. Michael

Good Afternoon! I had thinking that maybe is a permissions problem. Then, here the files permissions: [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 78 Jun  7 17:32 /etc/resolv.conf------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/hosts -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193 Dec  4  2017 /etc/hosts

Sorry, the real e-mail is this: [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service ● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)    Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-06-11 08:54:10 AST; 12min ago   Process: 1276 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -u named -c ${NAMEDCONF} $OPTIONS (code=exited,

Good Afternoon! I had thinking that maybe is a permissions problem. Then, here the files permissions: [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/resolv.conf-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 78 Jun  7 17:32 /etc/resolv.conf------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at pc ~]# ls -l /etc/hosts-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 193 Dec  4  2017 /etc/hosts

Hi Christian we did someithing similar some month ago and I only found only a rather complicated way. 1) We extracted the normal passwd and group information getent passwd > /root/passwd.out getent group > /root/group.out deleted system user and password, converted to ASCIi and sorted computers out of passwd.out grep '\$' /root/passwd.out.ascii  >

Hi I am running a Samba PDC and a Samba member server in his domain. The member server acts as a file server with unix acl's working. Is it possible to get these acl's working under samba to? The docs seem to say, that acl's are only possible if samba is a memberserver in an NT-Domain using winbind. In my case the PDC acts as a LDAP Server and the Member server is gets the unix

Good morning! After I changed some permissions and owners of some files where Rowland told me, I have the next escenary: [root at proxy ~]# systemctl status named.service ● named.service - Berkeley Internet Name Domain (DNS)    Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/named.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)    Active: active (running) since Mon 2018-06-11 08:54:10 AST; 12min ago  

Good catch. I had set server max protocol to NT1 after upgrading from samba 3.x to 4.x . Some windows clients had problems with SMB2 and file shares (tho this should not really be an issue with the domain controllers.) I have now set the dc's to server max protocol = SMB2 server min protocol = NT1 and the client machine to be client max protocol = SMB2

I forgot to say that  I updated Centos from 7.4 to 7.5, and I updated samba4 to the new version. This Would be a problem of records of something like that. José Fermín Francisco Ferreras Registered User #579535 (LinuxCounter.net) El lunes, 11 de junio de 2018 9:45:03 a. m. GMT-4, Fermin Francisco <abcddo at yahoo.com> escribió: Sorry, the real e-mail is this: [root at pc ~]#

-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von:schulz at adi.com <schulz at adi.com> > Gesendet: Mon 6 April 2015 19:17 > An: mmuehlfeld at samba.org; samba at lists.samba.org > Betreff: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.2.0: Group write permission not honored > > > Hello Thomas > > > > Am 06.04.2015 um 17:22 schrieb Thomas Schulz: > > > For anyone considering using

Hi- I am running Samba 2.2.8 on Solaris 8. Our Windows team has upgraded Windows 2003 servers Active Directory to Windows 2008. Samba is not working now. Can someone suggest the best Samba version for Solaris 8 that I can upgrade to that will support the new Windows 2008 authentication mechanism. Thanks -Steve Stephen P. Michaels ITSD Server Systems Group The Johns Hopkins University Applied

Good morning! I followed your instructions Rowland, but still showme the same error: I change this lines in smb.conf: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate, dns For this one: server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, > drepl, winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate [root at pc ~]# systemctl status named.service●

I am confused by obtaining different results when testing for unit root when using different packages. I have 2625 price entries for which I want to determine whether they exhibit unit root. First I test using adf.test from tseries package by running: > adf.test(P, k=30) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: P Dickey-Fuller = -4.685, Lag order = 30, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis:

Hi Hmm, there is a problem with Bind9, if you reload the config, it falls over, everybody pointed at Bind9, but now I am not so sure. Could it be that it is actually a Samba problem ?? I am not sure, if this may be related. We had SAMBA-BIND-DNS problems after an upgrade from CentOS-7.4 to CentOS-7.5 We were running a self compiled samba 4.7 During the Upgrade from Centos-7.4 ->

Hello! I am applying the ADF.test function from package uroot to a time series of data. When I apply the full test, incorporating drift and trend terms, the regressor estimate of the drift term is not significantly different from zero. So I apply the test to a model without drift term, with deterministic trend only. But then I always get the following error:

While sudo is used to give fairly trusted users the ability to run programs with root privs, there exists a hole in the one in the RedHat contrib directory (sudo 1.5.9.p4) which allows a minimally trusted user to obtain full root access and privilege. If a user is given the opportunity to run any program, that user can fool sudo and obtain any level of privilege for any executable. Assume

I am interested in opinions regarding the use of xinetd versus the use of tcp wrappers. The two programs have similar functionality, but I find xinetd suits my needs better. The biggest problem is the age of xinetd, and AFAIK it is no longer being kept up. Are there any known security issues with xinetd? Another issue is that xinetd makes use of a non-standard inetd.conf layout, but