similar to: ERROR: Could not retrieve the actual domain, forest level and/or lowest DC function level!

I bumped the logging up. samba-tool domain level raise --domain-level=2008_R2 schema_fsmo_init: we are master[yes] updates allowed[no] schema_fsmo_init: we are master[yes] updates allowed[no] The updates_allowed[no] concerns me? On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Jason Waters <jason at geeknocity.com> wrote: > I'm pretty sure the domain level raise is failing on this system.

Unfortunately its an old setup that I’ve inherited from someone else. From what i understand there was originally a windows sbs server and this samba dc has replaced that. It was done when samba 4 was in early beta. Thanks for the link i found that thread but as you say it doesn’t help. Failing any kind of fix is there a way to import users/computers into a fresh database?

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your answer. I gave a try with source4/scripting/bin/samba_upgradeprovision --full. Of course I did it on a virtual machine clone of our dc without network interface. The script fails with : ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1252: unique index violation on objectSid in CN=Account Operators,CN=Builtin,DC=removed,DC=com, conficts with CN=Op?rateurs de

I don't know exactly, but there were problems with indexes ( as the user said ). We did not try with the current release and our manager wants to go back to Microsoft :-( Our samba version is 4.7.5. I've been able to go one step further. We first were not able to join a Windows 2008 R2 as a domain controller because it was asking for adprep. I found the missing datas in the ldap and added

Hello: I need to update the samba schema when I run the command: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade I have this error: Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update allowed' setting Patched Sch49.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch49.ldf.diff Patched Sch50.ldf using /usr/local/samba/share/setup/adprep/WindowsServerDocs/Sch50.ldf.diff Patched Sch51.ldf using

On 07/07/16 21:13, Jason Waters wrote: > So I joined with samba's internal DNS, then converted to BIND, then > tested. Seems like it was working. I forced the 2003 machine out, > cleaned up the meta data and everything seemed to be working ok. So I > raised the domain level like this > > samba-tool domain level raise > samba-tool domain level raise

Hello all, We have a samba 4 domain controller. The domain controller was at first a secondary domain controller. We joined it to a domain were the first controller was a windows 2003 server. Then we have transfer the fsmo roles to the linux controller and demote the 2003 server. I then ran all the ldf files from the 2008 R2 dcpromo and raised the functional levels. Now we need to go back to

Could you install Exchange on a Samba PDC's network? What would happen if you tried to run /domainprep? Could Exchange interact with a LDAP backend? Would this be some sort of NT4/W2K mixed-mode directory services setup?

On 07/07/16 21:39, Jason Waters wrote: > I did that, it fixed 6 errors, ran it again, 0 errors. Still not able > to join. > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org > <mailto:rpenny at samba.org>> wrote: > > On 07/07/16 21:13, Jason Waters wrote: > > So I joined with samba's internal DNS, then converted to BIND,

Hi, for now I am using Win2003 functional level of my domain. I just wanted to ask if I raise the level to 2008_R2 will the scheme be extended like this article says? https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd446680%28v=ws.10%29.aspx I just want to know this for the time samba will someday support DC related GPOs. Thanks in advance Tim

On 07/07/16 17:14, Jason Waters wrote: > I'm going to keep going and see if I can get samba joined and then > migrated over. Maybe I'm still focusing on the wrong thing! Ugh.... > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Jason Waters <jason at geeknocity.com > <mailto:jason at geeknocity.com>> wrote: > > So I wanted to test if something was broke in my DC

On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 16:41 -0400, Luc Lalonde via samba wrote: > Hey folks, > > Has anything changed with 4.8.0 with respect to replication with a Win2KR2 server? > > In particular, can Samba 4.8 join a Windows 2012R2 domain (schema 69) as a DC? Will replication work properly? > > Thank You! This should work fine. Additionally the new samba-tool domain adprep tool can

root at pdc1-samba:/opt/adprep# ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb -b "CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,$(echo "DC=$(hostname -d)" | sed 's/\./,DC=/g')" -s base objectVersion | grep 'objectVersion' | awk '{print $NF}' 30 The scheme that this domain: 30 because it was a migration from a 2003 server some time ago. I want to upgrade. Now Try this

Hi Denis, We are using the latest version of sharepoint. samba-tool domain level show : Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=removed,DC=com' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 I did not have to change the revision attributes by hand. I think the MSAD2K3 was an upgrade from MSAD2K.

On 20/11/2020 02:13, Matthew Delfino Samba List wrote: > Thank you, Andrew! > > This evening I attempted the upgrade. I first carefully commented out each of the attributes from the Schema-Updates.md file. I then saved the file and ran the following command, which gave me the subsequent output: > > (as root) > > # samba-tool domain schemaupgrade > Temporarily

I have inherited a Samba server and would like to migrate the installation to a new machine. We are using Samba as a PDC and my currrent worry is what users will see on their desktop (as well as other changes?) once they log on to the new server. As a test I have logged on with my laptop (running WinXP virtually) and I get a completely blank desktop (with the exception of the trash can). Will

Hello, We have a sernet samba 4.2.7 dommain controller running centos 6.7. The functional level has been raised to 2008 R2 samba-tool domain level show Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=xxxxxxxxx,DC=com' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC: (Windows) 2008 R2 We are trying to add a Windows 2008 R2

On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 12:18 +0100, Pisch Tam?s wrote: > > Others have integrated Azure AD with Samba without the FL increase, > > and > > the key step would be the adprep work, > > Then I will do it without increasing the FL. What do I have to do > with adprep? To (prepare to) raise the domain functional level of an existing domain, after updating the smb.conf and

On Fri, 2019-05-31 at 10:46 +0100, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > As far as I am aware 2012 is planned for 4.11 (but as I am sure you are > aware, plans can change), after that I am sure that 2016 will be added > as soon as possible. It depends on what you mean by 2012. We should be able to join and be joined by a 2012 server thanks to the work to upgrade the schema (patches in just

Hello Denis, I checked all the attributes and objectclass defined in /usr/share/samba/setup/ad-schema/MS-AD_Schema_2K8_R2_Attributes.txt and /usr/share/samba/setup/ad-schema/MS-AD_Schema_2K8_R2_Classes.txt exists in my samba 4 ldap. Nothing is missing. Can you give me some inputs to "recreate a Samba 4.7 domain with same SID by piping in all the objects" ?