Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "OSX 10.9, sticky-bit and deleting other people's stuff"
2007 Feb 05
2
application 'allway sync' evades sticky bit?!
Hi,
am running:
Redhat EL4.4 i386, Samba 3.0.23d from Sernet, ext3 fs
Samba as PDC
Someone's got the idea to have one big share with access managed by
directory's sticky bit.
This works perfectly well when normal XP or W2k clients work with their
explorer.
But: With 'allway sync', an app to synchronize for example between
laptop and fileserver the program is somehow able to
2012 Jun 18
1
Samba4: s3fs sticky bit file ownership problem
Hi
I want all files created in a share to be group owned by a group called
staff. To do this I have a share called reports which is chmod g+s staff:
drwxrws---+ 9 root staff 4096 Jun 18 11:15 reports
If I create a file from Linux, the sticky bit works:
-rw-rw----+ 1 steve2 staff 0 Jun 18 10:57 stevelinux.txt
If I create it under windows, it doesn't:
-rwxrwx---+ 1 steve2 Domain
2007 Apr 18
3
file permissions with inherit permission + ACL's
Hi,
I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1,
testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only
created with 660 permissions.
Here are the ACL's of testshare:
# file: testshare
# owner: ralfgro
# group: ve
user::rwx
group::rwx
group:testgroup1:rwx
group:testgroup2:rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:group::---
2018 May 15
2
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
I would expect same permissions as for root mail directory 02770:
drwxrws--- 5 newuser mail 4096 Apr 23 19:31 /var/spool/mail/newuser/
Using Dovecot 2.2.34
On 14.05.2018 08:37, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
>
> On 09.05.2018 12:52, telsch wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> the wiki page describe that permission should copied from root mail
>> directory
>>
2005 Nov 10
1
Strange Samba permissions
I have a problem with some Samba permissions. Here is the share.
[bhs]
path = /school/bhs
read only = no
valid users = @teacher @admin @bhs
create mask = 660
force create mode = 2660
directory mask = 770
force directory mode = 3770
T: is mapped to a DFS share with permissions 3777, then the 'bhs' share
is a link in the DFS share.
I get inconsistent
2010 Oct 19
1
delivering mail to public mbox with permission 660?
I am migrating a couple old RH servers running sendmail and UW-IMAP to a
new Ubuntu 10.04 servers running Postfix and Dovecot.
I have everything working reasonably well except that the permissions of
newly created mbox mail folders is always 600.
I have reviewed the archives, google, and double checked everything is
as suggested in the Dovecot Wiki / SharedMailboxes / Permissions.
I am
2018 May 15
2
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
I use mdbox not maildir:
mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%u
On 15.05.2018 11:53, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Do you have
>
> mail_location=maildir:~/mail
>
> or
>
> mail_location = maildir:/path/to/whatever/%u
>
> I tested with latest 2.2 that if I use /path/to, I get correct permissions.
>
> Aki
>
>
> On 15.05.2018 12:43, telsch wrote:
>> I
2003 Jan 09
0
Inheriting Group Ownership on File Move
Hi,
Is it possible with samba to enforce the inheritance of group ownership on
a per-directory basis, for files moved without copying?
My situation is as follows:
directory 'a' has permissions: 2770 (drwxrws---) and has
owner = 'root' group = 'a'
directory 'b' has permissions: 2770 (drwxrws---) and has
owner = 'root' group = 'b'
As per
2011 Mar 25
3
samba howto: sticky bit on directories
Hi List,
The Samba Howto Collection http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/AccessControls.html#id2611229 says:
"When the set user or group ID bit (s) is set on a directory, then all files created within it will be owned by the user and/or group whose `set user or group' bit is set. "
while i cannot repoduce this behavior the wikipedia says:
2018 May 15
2
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
With this settings I don't get the expectet result, still get wrong
permissions on new mailboxes. Aki did you also try with %u ?
> In /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf follow options are set:
> mail_gid = mail
> mail_privileged_group = mail
> mail_access_groups = mail
> mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%u
On 15.05.2018 13:06, Aki Tuomi
2007 Aug 02
1
Shared folder hierarchies, multiple groups
Hi,
I'm trying to set up two shared folder hierarchies on my Dovecot
installation for two groups of employees, all of whom should only have
access to their own hierarchy. Any employee should be able to create
sub-folders and generally have full access to the hierarchy.
My initial setup was to create two public namespaces, Shared-One and
Shared-Two. Each is a Maildir under /var/mail.
The
2018 May 16
1
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
Yes, this settings work as i expected, but i didn't found documentation for
mail_home=
Thanks
On 15.05.2018 20:10, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>
> Well, that's not what I asked you to try...
>
> try
>
> mail_home=/var/spool/mail/%u
> mail_location=mdbox:~/
>
> Aki
>
>> On 15 May 2018 at 20:03 telsch <telsch at gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
2003 Jan 17
0
No access to root-level of shares on NT4 SP6 with Samba2.2.2 on FBSD-4.7
Hi John,
this is my smb.conf-file:
# /usr/local/etc/smb.conf
#
# $Id: smb.conf,v 1.1 2002/11/28 17:53:45 root Exp $
#
[global]
workgroup = ossa6
netbios name = claire
server string = File-services on claire.
hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/255.255.255.0
max log size = 0
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
smb passwd file = /usr/local/etc/smbpasswd
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
interfaces =
2024 Jun 04
1
How to give AD users group permissions on a Samba share
I have a Linux file server that is an AD Domain Member. It shares the
following (smb.conf):
[public]
path = /public
store dos attributes = no
hide dot files = yes
readonly = no
force group = ohprs
create mask = 0660
directory mask = 2770
The "force group" lets all Windows users map this folder and create
files and directories that all users can access and update. They are
created
2018 May 09
2
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
Hello,
the wiki page describe that permission should copied from root mail
directory
https://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Permissions
The permissions for the root mail directory are set to 2770:
drwxrws--- 36 root mail 4096 Apr 15 02:30 /var/spool/mail/
But newly created mailboxes get following permissions:
drwx--S--- 5 newuser mail 4096 Apr 23 19:31 /var/spool/mail/newuser/
In
2018 May 15
0
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
Do you have
mail_location=maildir:~/mail
or
mail_location = maildir:/path/to/whatever/%u
I tested with latest 2.2 that if I use /path/to, I get correct permissions.
Aki
On 15.05.2018 12:43, telsch wrote:
> I would expect same permissions as for root mail directory 02770:
> ????drwxrws--- 5 newuser mail 4096 Apr 23 19:31 /var/spool/mail/newuser/
>
> Using Dovecot 2.2.34
>
>
2018 May 15
0
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
I have to correct myself. I tested with sdbox now too, and it seems that
using
mail_location=sdbox:~/Mail
produces the expected behaviour. mdbox uses same code as sdbox for this,
so it should work fine.
Aki
On 15.05.2018 13:01, telsch wrote:
> I use mdbox not maildir:
>
> ????mail_location = mdbox:/var/spool/mail/%u
>
> On 15.05.2018 11:53, Aki Tuomi wrote:
>> Do you have
2018 May 15
0
Postfix/Dovecot permissions for new mailboxes
Well, that's not what I asked you to try...
try
mail_home=/var/spool/mail/%u
mail_location=mdbox:~/
Aki
> On 15 May 2018 at 20:03 telsch <telsch at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>
> With this settings I don't get the expectet result, still get wrong
> permissions on new mailboxes. Aki did you also try with %u ?
>
> > In /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-mail.conf follow
2005 Mar 24
0
acl et nfs
Hi,
i have a problem with permission on a share mounted threw NFS
i have a shared section like below
[juridique]
path = /samba/admin/services/juridique
writeable = yes
directory mask = 2770
create mask = 0770
valid users = @JURIDIQUE,@INFORMATIQUE
inherit acls = yes
browseable = no
if a member of JURIDIQUE creates a folder or file it has the rights :
2016 May 18
0
SGID bit not obeyed in 4.3.9?
On 18/05/16 19:44, Smith, Jarrod A wrote:
> We just upgraded to 4.3.9 (from 4.1.x) and are experiencing a few issues/differences around permissions on files written from Windows clients authenticated from winbind/AD. One specific issue that we have is directories with permissions like:
>
> drwxrws---+ 9 myapp 9997 2048 May 16 17:38 .
if you notice, there is a '+' at the end