similar to: Samba 4 AD with Bind 9.9 dlz permission access to /var/lib/samba/private/

Hello, I have recently compiled, installed and configured samba4 to run on a FreeBSD server. samba -V reports the version to be Version 4.1.0pre1-GIT-57990cb. The server has working BIND 9.9 and ISC-DHCP services running on it. I have provisioned samba 4 to use the BIND_DLZ DNS backend. On the whole things seem to be working. local names are being resolved. phpLDAPAdmin shows the new

Hello everyone, I?m deploying samba on a CenOS Server following the guide 'Samba AD DC How To' at wiki.samba.org. Everything has gone right till I got to the section 'Configuring Bind as Samba Active Directory backend?. Firstly Bind could not access '/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf? when adding the option 'include "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf?;? to

I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I come across the following: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now as dates on this bug are 2 years old?

Hi Robert, yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer TTL values. Regards, - lars. Am 07.09.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz: > > > On 09/07/2015 12:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration >> >> I am using

On 07/09/15 21:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? > Say every hour? > > On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when >> the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer >> TTL values.

How to achieve DLZ for ADDC with bind9.12.x?? I have it working with 9.11 but for 9.12? dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND 9.8.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9.so"; # For BIND 9.9.x # database "dlopen /usr/lib/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so"; # For BIND 9.10.x # database "dlopen

On 2015-08-21 14:11, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 12:52, John Gardeniers wrote: >> Hi Brady, >> >> I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my >> newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when >> installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that >> everything else is working, or the file

Puppet 2.7.19 (Puppet Enterprise 2.7.0) When I try to uninstall/purge the product using command below, /var/lib/peadmin/.* remains ./puppet-enterprise-uninstaller -pd [root@puppettarget peadmin]# ls -la total 44 drwx------ 5 502 502 4096 Feb 13 13:13 . drwxr-xr-x. 24 root root 4096 Feb 13 15:13 .. -rw------- 1 500 500 1952 Feb 12 16:18 .bash_history -rw-r--r-- 1 502 502 192 Feb 11

Hi, I was thinking about bidirectional sync of sysvol and i've a question: ?What about DRBD?. You can create a disk partition in every node, create a DRBD cluster and then mount that partition on sysvol folder. The sincronization is bidirectional and in real time. For now i've not tested this option, but i've plans to start some tests. What is your opinion about this? Greetings!!

Dear Belle, That produce the similar situation. Thus I'm trying osync And the result are much present according to my test case And configuration are much streamline. However, I'm not sure how it can work with 2 DC or more... Thank You On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:05 PM, L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai Min Wai Chan, > > I have tested it as shown in

Dear Daniel, Klaus I've try that before But because of how samba work on the files. The Advise is No Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the foot... On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Zerwes, Klaus <zerwes at rosalux.de> wrote: > Just some notes: > For master <-> master setup (bi-directional sync) you need AFAIK a cluster > filesystem. > I have no idea

On 09/07/2015 12:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I am looking at: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/DNS_administration > > I am using bind 9.9 on all my DNS servers. > > To set up secondarying my Samba DNS zones to my other Bind servers. I > come across the following: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9634 > > Is it possible to transfer the DLZ zones now

Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? Say every hour? On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: > Hi Robert, > > yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when > the repository changes. This can be painful, especially for longer TTL > values. > > Regards, > - lars. > > Am 07.09.2015 um 20:16 schrieb Robert

Hello Min Wai Chan, ? Can you explain more about,, the DC1 will remove any emptey directory on DC1. tested it here, but that does not occure here. i can create empty directories on DC1, and these are synced to DC2. empty or not. ? ?DC1 will overwrite any users/group change on DC2? if setup correctly, your sysvol rights on DC1 and DC2 are the same.. ? i suggest you to the following. get the

On 09/07/2015 04:56 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 07/09/15 21:26, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Is there some option on the slave to set the frequency of the AXFR? >> Say every hour? >> >> On 09/07/2015 03:45 PM, Lars Hanke wrote: >>> Hi Robert, >>> >>> yes it does work. But the DLZ bind will not notify any slaves, when >>> the

Hi Brady, I realise that but the only named.conf to be found on the system is my newly created /etc/named.conf. Either something screwed up when installing the Sernet RPMs, which is really pretty unlikely given that everything else is working, or the file was not included in the package. regards, John On 21/08/15 10:16, Brady, Mike wrote: > On 2015-08-21 11:18, John Gardeniers wrote:

2015-06-25 14:44 GMT+02:00 Daniel Carrasco Mar?n <danielmadrid19 at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-06-25 14:12 GMT+02:00 Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com>: > >> Dear Daniel, Klaus >> >> I've try that before >> But because of how samba work on the files. >> >> The Advise is No >> Without CTDB, you will just shoot yourself on the

Hello all, Just to ask have anyone try osync before? https://github.com/deajan/osync And would you think that this will fix our issue on https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Bidirectional_Replication Where DC2 files or folder will be removed? Thank You.

What Samba version are you using? I have seen a similar problem triggered by connectivity issues between the DCs. What's the output from samba-tool drs showrepl? Still, I haven't found a solution... On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Min Wai Chan <dcmwai at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to ask. > Anyone can shard some light on that wrong is that? > > Thank you. > > Min

Hi, While upgrading samba 4.4 to samba 4.10 I have detected taht with newer versions if you use bind-dlx config it seem that is not working by a permissions problems on new folder bind-dns on samba folder, If you change to 777 to this folder and named.conf then works, but is not secure... I have checked samba wiki and no information about this Any suggestion what could be the right