similar to: KVM install failure

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "KVM install failure"

2017 Nov 14
1
Join a subdomain DC to a domain DC
> > If your main domain is 'example.com' and you use 'ad.example.com' as a > > dns subdomain of 'example.com', the Samba DC would be authoritative > > for 'ad.example.com', the AD clients would use the DC as their > > nameserver for the domain and anything unknown by the DC (google for > > instance, or anything in the
2016 May 06
0
Samba4 AD DNS -- AD Subdomain vs Clients accessing on different subdomain
On 05/05/16 21:46, Thomas Maerz wrote: > Hello, > > We have an issue we’ve been struggling with for quite some time since we rolled out 10 Samba4 domain controllers at our main office and all remote sites about 3 years ago. > > Simplified Current Configuration: > > 2 DCs at main site with internal DNS using subdomain ad.companyname.com > 2 BIND CentOS servers serving all
2016 Apr 12
1
samba dns
On 2016.04.06, at 4:13 PM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > > On 06/04/16 21:58, Sonic wrote: >> Would prefer to continue to use my NSD/Unbound installs for most DNS >> (if not all) services. NSD is the authoritative server for the domain, >> and Unbound is the cache/resolver that the clients connect to. I'd >> like to not disturb this setup but
2016 May 06
0
Samba4 AD DNS -- AD Subdomain vs Clients accessing on different subdomain
On 06/05/16 13:01, mathias dufresne wrote: > 2016-05-06 9:39 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > >> On 05/05/16 21:46, Thomas Maerz wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> We have an issue we’ve been struggling with for quite some time since we >>> rolled out 10 Samba4 domain controllers at our main office and all remote >>>
2019 Apr 26
1
DNS forwarding not working.
> > > > > > Is this dns server also authoritative for the same dns domain as > > > the AD domain ? > > > > Yes, the Fedora29 server is authoritative. > > > > > > > > > > > Lets start with the smb.conf from the DC, your DC's FQDN and > > > ipaddress (sanitised if you have to) and the same for your Fedora
2019 Apr 26
0
DNS forwarding not working.
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:35:45 -0600 durwin at mgtsciences.com wrote: > > > I followed this url to set up Samba AD DC. > > > https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/full-howto-Ubuntu18. > > 04-samba-AD_DC.txt > > > > > > I do have it working. I am testing with a Windows 10 VM as a > > > member of the domain. > > > The machine
2017 Nov 14
0
Join a subdomain DC to a domain DC
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 20:07:38 -0200 Elias Pereira via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > Does nobody read the Samba wiki ??? > > > > What??? Samba has a wiki ??? *Bazinga *:D Yes, you will find it here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Main_Page > > As far as I am aware, AD subdomains do not work correctly with Samba > AD. > > >
2019 May 22
0
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
On 22/05/2019 18:24, Mike Ray wrote: > Poking around on this further, I believe the LMHOSTS error does not matter. > > The smb directive "name resolve order" defaults to "lmhosts wins host bcast" -- so I believe the file no found error is just because it's trying lmhosts first, not finding the file and then moving on. > > Eventually it hits "host"
2015 Oct 07
0
gpo failure
He.. im working also... ;-)   3 phone calls.. main boss in my office mous died... , answering you e-mail and installing windows pc. Working on support tickets... pff.. to much... at once..   And you cant access the server on DC3 at all with   \\dc3.domain.tld\sysvol   Or only \\dc3.domain.tld   Then check you share rights.   And/or apply ( but should not be needed if you use
2019 Jul 10
2
Samba4 Internal DNS and pfSense DNS Resolver
Am 10.07.19 um 20:38 schrieb miguel medalha via samba: > >> How could I achieve that when my client from the LAN makes a request >> to xmpp.domain.tld, SAMBA4 direct that request to pfSense and respond >> with the IP assigned to it? > > In the smb.conf file of your DCs you insert the line: > > dns forwarder = [IP address of your pfSense machine] there is no
2017 Sep 29
2
Replication Error Between Differing Samba Versions During Upgrade
Hey all- Trying to upgrade the domain and running into issues getting my data into the new controller. Current configuration: dc0 - Ubuntu 12.04.2 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-12 dc1 - Ubuntu 12.04.2 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-8 dc2 - Ubuntu 12.04.3 - Samba: 2:4.0.6-8 I'm trying upgrade to Ubuntu 16.04.3, Samba: 2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.10 The documentation
2019 Jul 10
2
Samba4 Internal DNS and pfSense DNS Resolver
On 10/07/2019 21:02, miguel medalha via samba wrote: > >> there is no reason why an authoritative nameserver would forward a >> request to his own domain no matter if it's samba, named or somethign >> else >> >> any authoritative nameserver is supposed to know *every* record within >> his own zones and you can't have half of them somewhere lese
2016 May 06
1
Samba4 AD DNS -- AD Subdomain vs Clients accessing on different subdomain
> Clients are not being pointed correctly, clients joined to the domain should be pointed at the DCs first, anything they do not know, they ask their forwarders. Although I agree that what you’re suggesting is a sane configuration, there are other ways to do it and I have tried it both ways. As I’ve explained in my first post, curgently all clients are pointed at BIND servers which forward all
2019 May 22
2
dsdb_access Access check failed on CN=Configuration
----- On May 22, 2019, at 1:00 PM, samba samba at lists.samba.org wrote: > On 22/05/2019 18:24, Mike Ray wrote: >> Poking around on this further, I believe the LMHOSTS error does not matter. >> >> The smb directive "name resolve order" defaults to "lmhosts wins host bcast" -- >> so I believe the file no found error is just because it's trying
2017 May 16
2
DNS (bind_dlz) forwarding not working
Rowland, Seeing as BIND_DLZ uses the same info in AD as SAMBA_INTERNAL does, > then no, using the internal dns server will not make any difference. Ok. Which ever dns server you use, it must be authoritative for the AD > domain and if required it should be a subdomain of your registered > domain, see here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Naming_FAQ >
2018 Sep 07
1
Centos 7.5 - Gnome3 - KVM - Keypad numeric failure
Everyone, I have a problem with the numeric keypad while using a Centos 7.5 new installation with kvm. When I login to the host machine using gnome3 or classic gnome the numeric keypad does not function. If I activate another 7.5 guest machine with gnome3 the numeric keypad on the guest does not work either. If I login on the host machine using kde as the desktop the keypad works fine and
2007 Jan 02
2
problem with mongrel/apache2.2.3 and subdomain setup
Hi all I got a vps setup amazingly fast using the deprec recipes on Ubuntu edgy, but now I''m having a minor issue where my site loads for the main domain when I only want it accessible from the subdomain. This is a pretty typical setup, apache 2.2.3 -> mongrel_proxy_balancer -> mongrel cluster. I''m sure I''m missing something obvious in the config... I have the
2009 Aug 14
9
Printing from wine problem - loosing my hair
I have a Ubuntu 9.04 minimalist setup runing on a XEN vps. I only installed a few things like Wine, NX, cups (and cups-pdf), XFCE4. Works like a charm in every way except printing from Wine. I can print from native Linux apps to PDF but I get an error in Notepad and any other wine running app for that matter, StartPage failed. There are no errors in the /var/log/error_log or any mention of the
2015 Oct 07
1
gpo failure
On 7-10-2015 14:52, mourik jan c heupink wrote: > I am not sure what to check or do next..? > I checked filesystems, and there is a difference: dc3 = ext4 dc4/dc2 = xfs But ext4/xfs should both support acl and user_xattr Problem dc3 is mounted like: > /dev/vda3 on /var/lib/samba type ext4 (rw,relatime,user_xattr,barrier=1,data=ordered) I don't see the problem... But I DO get
2020 Jun 01
0
several dns issues after switching fsmo roles to samba-dc
On 01/06/2020 14:40, Alex via samba wrote: > 1. After connecting DNS Manager to the all DCs, I've found that the SOA record > for my domain and msdcs zones still point to the former PDC - vm-dc1. > Is that OK? Probably, all DC's are authoritative for the domain: adminuser at dc4:~$ dig soa samdom.example.com ; <<>> DiG 9.10.3-P4-Debian <<>> soa