similar to: [Bug 10847] New: inconsistent units should be unified and follow SI/IEC standard

One of the greatest things about rails is that it is so standards-compliant, no other framework that I have seen have complied to the HTTP standard (think REST) in such a degree that Rails does. Kudos to you all for that. I think we (Rails community) should follow the line of standards compliance and also take it to the binary prefixes [1], i.e. kilobytes, megabytes, etc. For more than half a

LLVM does not support IEEE decimal-floating point. If by “fixed point arithmetic” you are asking about associating a scale factor with a variable/value, and doing the correct scaling for arbitrary arithmetic… LLVM doesn’t do that either. It’s a rare IR that even has the concept. The OpenVMS GEM compilers supported it (along with other special features for COBOL), but I’m not aware of any

Hi there, I tried all the driver on the list for this UPS, but they don?t work. Could you help me please? INFO: OMV 2.2.14 (Stone burner) Debian Release 7.11 - Linux nas01 3.2.0-4-amd64 Debian 3.2.93-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux HPE ProLiant Gen8 G1610T 819185-421 4GB RAM MicroServer NUT 2.0 installed from the Plugin Panel of OMV APC Back-UPS 390 Watts / 700 VA, 230V, AVR, IEC Sockets Best regards mikael

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10580 Summary: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2 Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hi, Does LLVM support decimal precision numbers supported? Also does it have Fixed point arithmetic? S -- Suminda Sirinath Salpitikorala Dharmasena, B.Sc. Comp. & I.S. (Hon.) Lond., P.G.Dip. Ind. Maths. J'Pura, MIEEE, MACM, CEO Sakrīō! ▣ *Address*: 6G • 1st Lane • Pagoda Road • Nugegoda 10250 • Sri Lanka. ▣ *Mobile* : +94-(0)711007945 ▣ *Tele*: +94-(0)11-5 864614 / 5 875614 / 2 825908 ▣

Also Q numbers format can be added for added precision. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130910/a78890c2/attachment.html>

> This will come in handy if you do not have a floating point unit. Also for > speed in some cases. > > To be generic as possible it might be good to have this. The goal isn't really maximum generality, but support for languages that people care about. Currently that's mostly C and C++, with a smattering of features for some others. But features almost never get added

These features can find use in embedded micro controllers and situation where you do not want rounding errors. x86 and ppc sound like Intel and Power PC specific. Of course once introduced some one must maintain it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130910/8cff2269/attachment.html>

On 9 September 2013 20:21, Suminda Dharmasena <sirinath at sakrio.com> wrote: > These features can find use in embedded micro controllers and situation > where you do not want rounding errors. Not until someone comes up with a language specifying them (or at least a highly suspect variant of C specifying them) they can't. Tim.

On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Mikael Imperatori Festa wrote: > Hi there, > I tried all the driver on the list for this UPS, but they don?t work. Could you help me please? Have you tried with apcupsd? Which protocol does apcupsd use for the Back-UPS 390 ? Roger > This e-mail message may contain confidential and/or privileged > information and is for the sole use of the intended

On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Mikael Imperatori Festa wrote: > driver = apcupsd > port = auto I meant the ? APC UPS Daemon ? at http://www.apcupsd.org/ Does this support your UPS unit? If so, what protocol is it using? What is the model number of your unit? BX650CI ? Roger

On Mon, 4 Dec 2017, Mikael Imperatori Festa wrote: > I had a look on the website, but I can?t see a detailed list of supported > units. Try installing and using apcupsd. Does it work correctly with the BX700UI? Which protocol is it using? Roger

Many thanks for getting back. This will come in handy if you do not have a floating point unit. Also for speed in some cases. To be generic as possible it might be good to have this. BTW, in the doc I was reading there was not mention about Quad size numbers, decimal numbers and extended precision numbers. http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#type-system -------------- next part -------------- An

I had a look on the website, but I can?t see a detailed list of supported units. The model number is BX700UI. Best regards mikael festa The Studio, Cornfields, Portsmouth Road, Ripley, Surrey GU23 6ERt: +44 (0)1932 865 459 | e: mikael at treefrogdesign.tv <mailto:james at treefrogdesign.tv> | w: treefrogdesign.tv <http://www.treefrogdesign.tv/>This e-mail message may contain

The server we are using is headless, I can?t install a desktop software unfortunately. That?s why I am trying to find a driver for NUT on OpenMediaVault. Best regards mikael festa The Studio, Cornfields, Portsmouth Road, Ripley, Surrey GU23 6ERt: +44 (0)1932 865 459 | e: mikael at treefrogdesign.tv <mailto:james at treefrogdesign.tv> | w: treefrogdesign.tv

Hi Roger, Thank you for your advise. I tried driver = apcupsd port = auto But unfortunately I get the same error message ?Failed to execute command ?upsc 'ups' 2>&1': Error: Driver not connected" As I am not very good in using OMV, maybe there is something else I should do? Thanks Best regards mikael festa The Studio, Cornfields, Portsmouth Road, Ripley, Surrey GU23

Hello Folks, I have a couple of questions - one about a basic UPS choice I am to make for a small UK office environment and the second about NUT Windows support. For the UPS, I have 2 or 3 servers, a phone system and a switch i.e. a basic : - Dell R410 1U (2x IEC) - Dell SC1425 1U (1x IEC) - Mitel 3300 CXi phone system (1x IEC) - Netgear GS748T switch (1x IEC) It would be good to also be able

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: wally.hall@gmail.com <wally.hall@gmail.com> Date: Apr 27, 2006 4:22 PM Subject: Conistent problem with clients joining domain To: Hey everyone, firstly thanks for your time, I've spent hours, a lot straight days too, for the last couple of weeks trying to solve this issue. The only thing (afai can see) I've got left is asking the

On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:45:05AM -0800, Charles 'Buck' Krasic wrote: > I don't remember the IEC spec saying anything about patents either. I > don't have it here, but I can check tonight. I'd appreciate it. It wouldn't be surprising if it ignores the issue, no, but some of the IEC standards do have disclosure list. -r --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hi, The LangRef says this about fptrunc: "The ‘fptrunc‘ instruction truncates a value from a larger floating point type to a smaller floating point type. If the value cannot fit within the destination type, ty2, then the results are undefined." What does it mean for the value to "fit within the destination type"? For instance, is the value of %Inf = fptrunc double