similar to: Preserve ZFS ACLs when syncing to Linux (ext4)

Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy. What about the (future) implementation of RichACL? Will there be any native Linux Client support along with the SMB2/SMB3 protocol? I know, there is a native implemenation for RichACLs in ext4 FS. Unfortunately, smbcals is not a native Linux ACL Tool and has a very unhandy syntax. I just tested some days ago. ;-) I am looking for a solution that allows the

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:28:44PM +0100, Matteo Maretto wrote: > Hi, > thanks for your question. > We have not investigated this matter yet, but we espect to find at least a > basic correspondence between the two. This would be enough for us. > On the Novell documentation we've read that the object rights are > essentially four: Browse, Create, Delete, Inheritance Control,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 04:51:21PM +0000, Kraus, Sebastian via samba wrote: > Thanks for the first reply, Jeremy. > What about the (future) implementation of RichACL? Windows ACLs map quite well into RichACLs. Unfortunately Christolph Hellwig has peristently blocked any merge of the RichACLs code into the Linux kernel. If you use ZFS then you can use ZFSACLs which are quivalent. >

I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post this here for a sanity check. :) I've been searching for over a week for a solution and have turned up nil. I'm trying to rsync with options -AX over an NFSv4 mount TO an ext4 drive FROM an ext4 drive and both have acl and user_xattr enabled. The command: rsync -aAX /data/ /mnt/back/data results in: rsync:

Dear all, The system is Ubuntu 12.04 (latest beta as of yesterday) Bind 9.81 (12.04 standard) Samba 4, also git-cloned yesterday. I've imported a zpool created on another ubuntu system with the same version of zfs-linux (RC-8) http://zfsonlinux.org/ The zpool is working perfectly well; responsive, no errors reported, scrubbed. Samba can see the zpool as part of the greater file system and

On 6/17/19 2:26 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > Don't think this is going to happen (but what do I know ?), I could sort > of understand dropping 'nmbd' but 'smbd' & 'winbindd' will give you just > the same as using sssd with Samba, with only one config file. Can I ask > you what you use sssd for ? is it just for authentication, or something

Hi. We set up a samba domain with two DC ver. 4.7.3 and a file server ver. 4.7.1. Currently we have a problem setting ACLs from a Microsoft client. When we set an ACL the client shows the new ACL correctly, but on the fileserver the /getfacl/ command shows no changes. The filesystem is na ext4 with the options /rw,acl,user_xattr,usrquota,grpquota./ This is the share configuration:/ /

Dear all, what is about the support for POSIX ACL in Samba protocol implementation of SMB2 and SMB3? >From what I extracted from SNIA and SambaXP developer conference talks and as well as the official Samba Wiki, support for POSIX ACL in SMB2 and SMB3 has been completely abandonned. Am I right? If so, is there any other possibility to allow Linux Clients to natively access access control lists

I missed than one. Very useful hint. Now I can set ACLs again. Thank you. Il 15/02/2018 13:23, Miguel Medalha ha scritto: > Here's what I was looking for. > > On Tue Mar 22 08:19:42 UTC 2016 Uri Simchoni posted the following to > the samba-technical mailing list: > > "Attached patch avoids setting the POSIX ACLs to match the NT ACLs, if > "ignore system

On 5/4/2015 1:09 AM, tballin wrote: > Hello, > > we want to migrate to CentOS 7(.1) , Server, Client etc ... > > Right now we need to suspend that because we have some serious issues > with NFS4 shared ZFS ( kernel module - zfs on linux project ) Volumes > and CentOS 7 clients. > > Our current server are CentOS6.5, if we share a zfs volume and do the > following on

Hi, there was recently a bug reported against EXT4 that gets triggered by KDE: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/317781 Now I''d like to verify that my understanding of ZFS behavior and implementations is correct, and ZFS is unaffected from this kind of issue. Maybe somebody would like to comment on this. The underlying problem with ext4 is that some kde

Hello, we want to migrate to CentOS 7(.1) , Server, Client etc ... Right now we need to suspend that because we have some serious issues with NFS4 shared ZFS ( kernel module - zfs on linux project ) Volumes and CentOS 7 clients. Our current server are CentOS6.5, if we share a zfs volume and do the following on this share: client A reads/access file "z.txt". Now client B replaces

I am running the current version of rsync on Androic CM 11.2 and 12.1 on phones and tablets. While syncing to a server works fine, I am having problems with reverse syncing, specifically having the date and time set for files on the reverse sync. Currently the flags are "rsync - vHrlt --chmod=Du+rwx, go-rwx, Fu+rw, go-rw --no-perms -e "ssh -y -p 22 -i '...'...* source

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:08:42AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:13:12AM +0100, Matteo Maretto wrote: > > Hi, > > we are migrating our fileserver from an old novell netware system to > > a samba4 system. With netware all ACL were stored in a database, so > > that it was possible to quickly find which files one user or group > > had

On 17/06/2019 21:49, Goetz, Patrick G via samba wrote: > On 6/17/19 2:26 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> Don't think this is going to happen (but what do I know ?), I could sort >> of understand dropping 'nmbd' but 'smbd' & 'winbindd' will give you just >> the same as using sssd with Samba, with only one config file. Can I ask >> you

On 17/11/16 13:15, Reinald Gfuellner via samba wrote: > I try to set up a Samba4-based Fileserver in an Samba3-DC enviroment. > Filesystem is ext4, CIFS + NFS4 should be provided. The same ACLs should > be used over both protocols. > > With Samba 3 this was possible (using POSIX 1003.1e DRAFT 17 ACLs only) > . How can I do the same with Samba 4 ? > > Posix-ACLs set on

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Xattrs are not supported via NFS: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.nfs/53259 I would suggest letting rsync do the networking between the Linux systems (probably over ssh). This will also prevent you from being stuck in --whole-file. On 03/11/2015 09:41 AM, Andrew LaPierre wrote: > I think this is an NFS or ext4 question, but wanted to post

When using the following to keep duplicate files on multiple computers, I find some files have their ACLs changed and cannot then be opened. I am using the following command. My goal is to be able to read/write/edit any local or remote file from any machine. Until recently this worked just fine, but now some files cannot be opened once rsync'd. rsync -avzh --progress --delete --super -A

Hello, I'm using rsync 3.0.9 to backup several NFS shares from a fileserver, mounted over NFSv3, to a local RAID on a backup server. Both servers are running Ubuntu 12.04 server LTS. The fileserver's filesystem is ext4. The NFS shares are mounted on the backup server as follows: fileserver:/mnt/storage/share1 /mnt/share1 type nfs (ro,tcp,bg,soft,intr,addr=192.168.1.1)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11545 Bug ID: 11545 Summary: -A (preserve ACLs) with --link-dest=DIR fails when DIR has a directory with the same file's name Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5