similar to: [Bug 10679] New: readlink_stat error results in deletion of mountpoints

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1502 Summary: rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(836) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.2 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

what makes you believe that ssh is accessing the files ? ok, rsync on remote mac is being spawned by sshd, so i gave full disk access to the sshd binary , too (as it may inherit restrictions to sub processes) and restarted ssh service , but unfortunately it makes no difference. did you mean that or something different ? roland Am 28.03.20 um 16:20 schrieb Ben Bass: > Hi Roland. > >

hello, does somebody know how to circumvent that "extra file access restriction feature" introduced in osx some time ago ? i already tried adding rsync binary to programms with "full disk access" privilege ( system-prefs -> security & privacy -> privacy -> full disk access)? , since running as root is not sufficient - but it does not work. i want to make sure

Using rsync 2.6.0 with --verbose and doing a pull. >?receiving file list ... readlink "{FILENAME}" failed: >?No such file or directory >?done >?IO error encountered - skipping file deletion The file was a temporary file that was being deleted just as the rsync was run. So while the file list was being built, it was there when the directory was read but had vanished by the

I came up with a patch to fix the problem of IO Errors caused by excluded files as did Eugene V. Chupriyanov below. Is there a chance that this change will show up in a future version of rsync? Is there a reason that we should not ignore IO errors when copy_links is off? Just want to make sure that I'm not missing something here that may corrupt my syncs.... Here's the version that

Hello List I've been running this command, with the accompanying error: [root at mythtv ~]# ssh -t rsync at 192.168.1.40 sudo rsync -avzAXH --delete-after -e /home/rsync/bin/rsync_ssh /home/ root at 192.168.1.100:/mnt/bigdisk/morgansmachine/home root at 192.168.1.100's password: building file list ... rsync: readlink_stat("/home/morgan/.gvfs") failed: Permission denied (13) done

Hi all. This looks like a common question. I want to backup a dir, in which i put some symlinks, so it looks like machinegun:/tmp/daily_backup # ls -la total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2010-02-17 17:41 . drwxrwxrwt 19 root root 4096 2010-02-17 17:30 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2010-02-17 17:41 cgi-bin -> /srv/www/cgi-bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2010-02-17 17:17 etc -> /etc

How is rsync supposed to behave when I give the --delete-excluded? Recently I lost several of my important documents because of a corrupted file system on the source. Here are some logs, * Rsync gets an IO error on one of the folders, -- rsync: readlink_stat("/mnt/raid-backup/Documents/Finance") failed: Input/output error (5) -- * It starts deleting all my financial documents, --

Hi, when syncing from windows NT/cygwin to linux usimg rsync 2.5.2 I get the following error: readlink pagefile.sys: Permission denied IO error encountered - skipping file deletion pagefile.sys is however in the exclude-list, so I think rsync shouldn't care that it can't stat the file. The code fragment responsible is if (readlink_stat(fname, &st, linkbuf) != 0) {

We reently upgraded our rsync client from Freebsd 10.2 to 11.2 which upgraded our rsync from 3.0.6 protocol version 30 to 3.1.3 protocol version 31. The server remains Freebsd 11.1 with rsync 3.1.2 protocol version 31. Now we get numerous messages like this: rsync: readlink_stat("/disk/homedirs/nber/bstevens/public_html/old/test/press reaction/Foreign

Full_Name: Ben Hansen Version: 2.6.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (66.93.3.101) Hi, In R 2.6.0 or 2.6.1 on Windows, I get the following upon opening the GUI (no previous commands or special settings): > signif(digits=4, x=1/3) [1] 4 It seems to be taking 4 to be the "x" argument, the number to be rounded. However, my understanding (perhaps mistaken) was that it should

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7424 Summary: -x with sshfs Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: bugs at dotcommie.net QAContact: rsync-qa at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11086 Bug ID: 11086 Summary: rsync --delete has stopped to delete destination files that don't exist at the source Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component:

I ran rsync with the --one-file-system option and observed: building file list ... readlink_stat "/home/pimlott/mnt/<hostname>" failed: Input/output error done IO error encountered - skipping file deletion Of course, this directory is a remote mount-point, and the remote host cannot be reached. I intuitively expected this error to be ignored, since the directory

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3147 Summary: message 'copying unsafe symlink' only appears if verbose>=2 Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org

Dear friends! I really appriciate the great job you did on rsync package and hope for its further improvement and development. It works great in our pretty complex environment and helps us a lot in our daily duties. But we've run into couple of small inconveniences. First one: We use rsyncd to propagate a tree of html files among several web-servers. That files are generated on the fly and

Hi - I have implemented an rsync script that runs on a Leopard OS X system and backup the local host itself, plus 2 remote machines - another Leopard machine and a Win XP laptop. The remote backups are performed by connection to an rsync daemon. I'm using rsync 3.0.4 with a few extension for the Mac OS X side. When doing the backup of the XP box I see these error messages: 28/11/2008

Roland via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > does somebody know how to circumvent that "extra file access restriction > feature" introduced in osx some time ago ? It may not be possible. Based on experience with FreeBSD, from which much of OSX is derived, I suspect you may be running into issues with "file flags"; check the OSX documentation for the

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10226 Summary: fatal_unsafe_io_error and the version it reports Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Martin.vGagern at

Greetings, I've hit this exact 'bug': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491311 I need to remove the mappings manually. I assume this is done via 'multipath -F' followed by a 'multipath -v2' ? Has anyone experienced doing this on a production system? We can do it during hours of low activity, but we would prefer to keep the databases on this host online at