similar to: rsync for windows doesn't like "--rsh"?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "rsync for windows doesn't like "--rsh"?"

2012 Aug 02
1
samba-3.5.14 (and less) corrupting AD->UID mappings
Hi there We've had three incidents this year where users connected to Samba shares (on CentOS systems) and appeared as the incorrect Windows account. e.g "dom\user1" would connect, but any files they created would be owned by Unix user "dom\user2" This is of course pretty nasty. We normally delete all the cache and winbind TDB files and restart and that fixes it - but
2014 Mar 10
1
NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES - but only from Samba - works for Windows?
Hi there I've just a Windows7 box here that is erroring with "NT_STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES" whenever I try to connect using any samba tools: smbclient, "net", "rpcclient". This is when using Domain Admin creds, either via Kerberos (-k) or direct username%password. According to google, this is a resource problem on Windows and restarting the appropriate
2012 Jan 15
1
idmap config doesn't allow range to be changed?
Hi there I've just upgraded a working samba-3.5.8 CentOS-4.9 (yes - pretty old) server to samba-3.6.1 and can't change "idmap config". We almost immediately had issues with it not working for some users - and the logs showed we'd run out of idmap mappings (strange that never happened before with the older version...) Anyway, I edited smb.conf so that idmap config
2015 Jul 07
1
replacement for winexe?
Hi there We're starting to play around with Win10 and I've noticed winexe doesn't seems to work against it - generates a NT_STATUS_BAD_INITIAL_PC error when connecting Looking around it seems like winexe really isn't maintained anymore? - which may be the reason it doesn't support Win10 as currently you can't even compile it against a current version of Samba4 (which
2011 Dec 19
0
samba-3.6.1 cannot be used by trusted domain users?
Hi there Samba is a member of dom1.corp.net, there are also dom2.corp.net and dom3.corp.net - together making up the "CORP" forest. There are other forests with two-way trusts with CORP.NET, such as OTHER.NET We have a problem where Samba/winbind is inconsistent on account details and therefore access. * wbinfo -D OTHER returns details about "other.net" - good * wbinfo
2012 Apr 14
0
testjoin happy but kerberos broken
Hi there I've got a problem CentOS-4.9 Samba server that we have never been able to join to an existing Win2K3/Win2K8 AD domain correctly. We have before and since installed Samba successfully on other sites btw. We actually have 55+ CentOs-4.9 Samba servers world-wide with identical configs - there's something about this one. Anyway, "net ads join -Uadmininstrator...." works
2013 Sep 16
0
question about "idmap config" in multi-forest environment
Hi there We're having problems with users attaching to our (winbind) Samba servers and being assigned the same UID. Rarely happens - not repeatable - but definitely a pattern Anyway, I've been googling about and I think I've figured out the root cause, so I thought I'd check with the community first, because if I go off an change to my new model, it could take months before I
2006 Dec 05
1
Cannot connect to Samba-3.0.23d (and earlier) from other trusted AD domains
Hi there We have a bunch of Samba 3.0.10+ CentOS4.4 servers that are working 100% fine when connected to from users who are members of the same ADS domain our Samba servers are members of. However, users from other ADS domains (we are all W2K3-based) on our network cannot connect - they get NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. The shares they are trying to connect to have no share-level permission checks -
2007 Dec 12
2
Vista SP1-rc1 appears to break against Samba-3.0.27a
We've got nicely ADS integrated Samba-3.0.27a servers that are working fine with Win2000 through to standard Vista. However, we are starting to test RC1 of Vista SP1 and discovered that once applied, that workstation cannot connect to Samba server shares - unless the share is open - i.e. no "valid user" style settings. The moment one is defined, Vista fails to connect and pops up an
2004 Jun 15
1
How do you properly use "--partial"?
[background: we rsync Gbs of data over our WAN, so want to run rsync as efficiently as possible. We have Linux "rsync servers" that mount local Windows file servers - i.e we use Linux-rsync to replicate data between Windows file servers. (why? we found Linux IP stack to be superior over our WAN)] I know that "--partial" on it's own merely makes the rsync server process
2005 Oct 16
1
Can Asterisk "proxy" a SIP phone to make it look like a Cisco skinny softphone?
Hi there We have a Cisco VOIP environment here, with hard and softphones. I have a softphone account/etc, but I'm a Linux user and (as far as I'm aware) there is no Cisco softphone for Linux. However I can run Asterisk. So I was wondering if there is a way to "convert" a SIP phone transaction into a SKINNY transaction so that the Cisco environment thinks it is a Cisco
2007 May 21
1
3.0.25 breaks "username map"?
Hi there I was using "username map" under 3.0.24 so that when I connected from DOM\jhaar under (ADS Win2K3) Windows, it was mapped to my local "jhaar" Unix account - with homedir "/home/jhaar", etc. However, when I upgraded to 3.0.25, I started getting NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE errors - even when just trying to list the shares. This occurred using smbclient as well as
2008 Jan 28
2
Win2K3 DNS losing Samba DNS entries?
Hi there We are having a problem where the DNS "A" records of ADS member Samba servers are disappearing from DNS. It's not routine, but it is definitely real. What we normally do is assign static IPs, create DNS records manually and then install and configure the Samba server (mainly CentOS4 and CentOS5) and "net ads join" it to the domain. This is normally good for a
2007 Mar 12
2
Samba kerberos more time sensitive that Windows?
Hi there We just had a problem where a user couldn't connect to a Samba server that is a full ADS member. The same user could successfully connect to Windows2K3 servers. The problem was obvious - their clock was 5 hours out, and Samba rejected their connections with a "Failed to verify incoming ticket". Correcting the time fixed the fault. However, it remains that Samba rejected
2006 Mar 05
1
sctp support for rsync?
Hi there I've just done some brief reading up on SCTP, and I get the impression it will allow multiple "threads" of streamed data as part of one connection? I was wondering what impact that would have on high bandwidth, high latency links? Currently our bottleneck in using rsync is due to that. We have fat pipes and yet a single rsync session cannot saturate it due to the latency.
2006 Oct 13
1
"rsync -z" not working as expected under 2.6.8 and 2.6.9?
I got curious as to how rsync operates, and got a few tests going under ethereal. The results confused me more. I created /tmp/test-out/ containing two different text files - one named "file.txt" and the other "data.gz". ie. data.gz wasn't actually compressed - it was actually text. I then created an empty directory on a rsync server to replicate that data to. I did a
2007 Jan 13
1
fam inconsistent in noticing changes
I'm running Samba-3.0.23d on CentOS4.4 servers. We have a process where people can upload files (from WinXP) to a directory over Samba, and then a Unix cronjob picks those files up, moves them to another directory (outside of Samba) and does things to them. The problem is that when the file moves occur, WinXP doesn't show the files have disappeared. Even days later the files show up as
2008 Aug 27
1
nested group support still broken in 3.2.2?
Hi there I've just upgraded to 3.2.2 and it still looks like nested group support isn't finished? e.g. if I have "domain1/user1" in group "domain2/group1" and that in turn is in "domain3/group2" (i.e. domain1/user1 is in domain3/group2), then "getent group domain3/group2" should return domain1/user1 - and yet it doesn't. "winbind enum
2009 Oct 21
1
mount.cifs not reporting locking issues to Linux?
Hi there I recall in times past that when a locked file on a Windows server was accessed by smbfs, you received a kind of "text file busy" type error under Linux. However, on our CentOS4 servers running mount.cifs, accessing a locked file now only reports a "Permission denied" Wireshark shows the server sending "STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT" errors to Linux, but it
2010 Mar 23
1
way to get smbclient to do "dir *\filename"?
Says it all really. I'm hoping there's some escape char trick I could do to make this work? Recursing through all the directories would obviously work, but this is for a script that runs over the WAN, so performance is a major issue - I literally just want to see if a file exists in one of the next layers down. Just getting the wildcard through (I think CIFS allows that?) would solve the