similar to: directory permissions not set until all files copied

OK , but then the solution with symlinks is equivalent, just with the right options for rsync. Make the link. Sync + exclude. Remove the link. Don't have to live with the folder on the source. *_______________Gionata Boccalini* 2015-06-08 22:49 GMT+02:00 Michael Johnson - MJ <mj at revmj.com>: > Oh, actually, I just thought of a couple other another options that don't >

Michael Johnson - MJ <mj at revmj.com> wrote: > rsync -av /src/ /dst/ && touch /dst/done Aaaaahhhh, knew I'd miss some detail. All the syncs are pushed to the backup server. But that does give me an idea. I guess I could do that on the source, then sync the flag file over. rsync -avH ${other_gubbins} / user at remote.machine:/dest/ && touch /etc/donefile

Should be as long as you don't have other symlinks in the tree. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, 15:14 Gionata Boccalini <gionata.boccalini at gmail.com> wrote: > OK , but then the solution with symlinks is equivalent, just with the > right options for rsync. > > Make the link. > Sync + exclude. > Remove the link. > > Don't have to live with the folder on the source.

As part of my backup system, I use Rsync to keep a copy of each server on one central backup server. This backup server then uses StoreBackup to keep multiple iterations of each clone directory. So that the StoreBackup archives don't keep adding "redundant" and misleading backups, I update a flag file with the current date/time before doing the Rsync update, and test to see if this

On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. > > On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> 3.1.1 Figure out Partition scheme >> ---------------------------------- >> we

On Jul 16, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 7/16/13 5:23 AM, Evan Cheng wrote: >> Thanks for the proposal. This is important work which is one step towards making LTO more applicable for large applications. Some comments inline. >> >> On Jul 12, 2013, at 3:49 PM, Shuxin Yang <shuxin.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >>

Hey folks, Does anyone know of a rack configurator that runs on CentOS? It does not have to even be very fancy - immediately I'm just looking for an easy way to keep track of what is in my racks, and being able to have a visual of it. Maybe juggle stuff around. Bonus if it does power calculations based on model numbers and so on - or data I punch in for each model. But really right

I might be missing something really obvious, but is there an easy way to locate all non-unique values in a data frame? Example mydata <- numeric() mydata$id <- 0:8 mydata$unique <- c(1:5, 1:4) mydata$result <- c(1:3, 1:3, 1:3) > mydata $id [1] 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 $unique [1] 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 $result [1] 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 What I want to to be able to get some form of data output

Hi, now it's time to come back to this topic. As supposed, the missing hardlinks where no issue of rsync. I am not sure if pairing aufs (http://aufs.sourceforge.net/) and rsync -RH will catch each and every hardlink compared to a single filesystem, but it seems to work very reliable. I tried mhdfs and aufs. Aufs is faster and very stable (I am on wheezy kernel 3.2). So at last I have my

allan odgaard said: > the specification seems fairly explicit: i must be badly misunderstanding something here, because it appears, to me at least, that mr. odgaard wants you to "standardize" on gruber's specification? that "specification" -- if you really want to call it that -- is so underpowered that such action would be laughable. > I think there are

FYI Arnaud ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Silvino Benevides Magalhaes <sbm2yk at gmail.com> Date: 2009/10/14 Subject: Re: about solis and rhino To: Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com> Hi Arnaud, I was on holiday, so I only answer you now. About rhino, I received a document contains the its protocol and a little box with rhino firmware to testing driver

>Just an aside .. are you putting these Cygwin installs on the same box? >Can you do that? I didn't think it was allowed. Ahh, we have ways of renaming directories :) I do have a second machine but I have to juggle the disk partitions to make enough room so I have not been able to use that. Besides for some reason it did not want to build binutils-2.15 :( Okay it looks like the newer

Statistics Practitioner Fluent in R - San Francisco CA Loyalty Matrix Inc., in downtown San Francisco, is expanding our team. We are a young, dynamic and growing team of multidisciplinary marketing and technical professionals. We deliver value to our clients by discovering actionable tactical and strategic insights in actual customer data augmented with demographics and research. You will work

I have pretty big data sizes, like matrices of .5 to 1.5GB so once i need to juggle several of them i am in need of disk cache. I am trying to use bigmemory package but getting problems that are hard to understand. I am getting seg faults and machine just hanging. I work by the way on Red Hat Linux, 64 bit R version 10. Simplest problem is just saving matrices. When i do something like

On 4/7/20 4:35 PM, John Garry wrote: > On 07/04/2020 15:00, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> On 4/7/20 1:54 PM, John Garry wrote: >>> On 06/04/2020 10:05, Hannes Reinecke wrote: [ .. ] >>>> This would be okay if 'this_id' would have been defined by the driver; >>>> sadly, most drivers which are affected here do set 'this_id' to -1.

I am trying to duplicate the setup on my netware box on my samba box. Everyone wants to keep a single drive letter and go to the various dir's from there. So, what I did was create a share called "sys" and created various dir's underneath it, e.g. hr, eng, etc.... I setup the hr dir and files therein with 770 (i tried 777 also) and root:hr permissions. If an hr group member

Greetings! I'm experimenting with the 2.0.0.alpha13 snapshot and attempting to get my four Solaris fileservers to present a single uniform (automounter-like) namespace to our NT clients. Re-wording, I'd like PC clients to see a single "server" that appears to share all of the Unix home directories on four fileservers. The automounter shields my Unix users from the operational

Hi all, I'm using glusterfs in comination with aufs. With aufs I mount a read-only directory from the local harddisk and a writable directory from the glusterfs together. It works fine, so far. The only problem occurs if I change a file insides a directory of the read-only directory. Aufs normal behavior is to create the directory structure for the changed file in the writable directory and

Technically, as long as our thread model is SERIALIZE_ALL_REQUESTS, we don't have to be very careful about atomic CLOEXEC on any of the pipes we create for communication with the child. However, the next patch wants to promote sh plugin to parallel when possible, which requires the use of pipe2 to avoid fd leaks. Also, add an assert to ensure that we avoid dup2(n, n) (which would fail to

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13827 Bug ID: 13827 Summary: despite --copy-unsafe-links, rsync does not copy the referent of symlinks that point one level outside the copied tree Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: