similar to: [Bug 10580] New: Total file size reported wrong with --stats --info=progress2

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450 Summary: --info=progress2 increase % Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: vania.toperich at gmail.com

Hi there: I am testing rsync with a large number of small files. I am using 'tee' to keep the log, and I noticed that the log file was growing very quickly. It seems that the progress text refreshes too often: building file list ... ?0 files... ?100 files... ?200 files... ?300 files... ?... ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s??? 0:10:20 (xfr#478709, to-chk=9/537759) ?5.53G? 95%??? 8.50MB/s???

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10451 Summary: --info=progress2 with --bwlimit doesn't give correct value Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10677 Summary: external zlib broken after update to 3.1.1 on FreeBSD Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Platform: x64 OS/Version: FreeBSD Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ehaupt at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11378 Nathan Neulinger <nneul at neulinger.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME |--- --- Comment #2 from Nathan Neulinger <nneul

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12940 Bug ID: 12940 Summary: rsync: -C/--cvs-exclude does not ignore SCM ignore files (patch) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: core Assignee:

Hi, I just stepped on a strange and very annoying bug in rsync-3.1.0 as shipped with SuSE Linux Enterprise 12, but verified the bug also with rsync-HEAD-20170123. I tried to copy some of my movie collection to a usb disk that our TV could read, so it was formatted with vfat. I forgot that vfat can't handle files > 4 GB, and some of the movies were larger. rsync worked for 3 hours copying

On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 06:37:57AM -0500, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > I have Samba shares mounted to my Linux workstation. Mostly I access files on the Samba server over the Samba mount. I use mount.cifs to bring up these mounts. > > For a couple of special cases, I use scp to transfer files between the > server and workstation. Special characters in filenames give sending them

On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 12:21:17 +0100 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > >>>

On 03/11/2019 11:37, Michael Lueck via samba wrote: > Greetings Samba team, > > It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. > > Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via > Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually > that was yesterday I applied them. > > >> samba

Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 > Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I'm running a Samba server on Raspbian and observing that Samba >> during idle periods is constantly (every minute) writing to HDD >> (maybe doing some journaling?) what causes the HDD to constantly spin

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13423 Bug ID: 13423 Summary: Checksum option does not work as expected when append-verify is used Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Am 07.11.18 um 12:07 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 11:44:28 +0100 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Am 07.11.18 um 09:54 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:45:45 +0300 >>> Albert Berger via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>

Greetings Samba team, It has been a long time since I needed to ask a Samba technical question. Server and workstation are both running the latest Samba packages via Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I recently applied the security updates... actually that was yesterday I applied them. > samba (2:4.3.11+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.23) xenial-security; urgency=medium > > * SECURITY UPDATE: client code can

Hi, I'm a bit new to rsync, and I recently learnt about the --info=progress2 flag to display complete transfer progress. However while transferring I encountered some unusually large transfer rates being displayed repeatedly. I used "rsync -av --info=progress2" to transfer a folder with several large files. Every time a new file was started , the initial transfer rate was unusually

Hi Vania, If I understood correctly, you have an executable, which is JITing code that has dependencies on the symbols of entire executable. In case dlsym cannot find this symbol, try to link your executable with -rdynamic (gcc) or --export-dynamic (ld): -rdynamic Pass the flag -export-dynamic to the ELF linker, on targets that support it. This instructs the linker

Dear rsync devs, I recently concluded a bug hunt to trace why my rsync-ing to an SBC was much slower than the corresponding iperf3-reported speeds. To give a concise summary of the situation, in slow wifi links using SSH with ProxyCommand tremendously speeds up things: $ dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1M count=50 of=sample.data 50+0 records in 50+0 records out 52428800 bytes (52 MB, 50

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First, don't use -z on a local copy. It will only make rsync slower for no reason at all. Second, 45 million files means 90 million calls to stat(). This will take a while even if nothing needs copying. On 01/21/2016 03:20 AM, dbonde+forum+rsync.lists.samba.org at gmail.com wrote: > I run a rsync job transferring about 45 million

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Hello,<br> <br> We are a research project in joint french-chinese laboratory. We are considering using<br> LLVM in our project but we'd like to have some additional info before we dive in.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 5:56 AM, Vania Joloboff <vania.joloboff at inria.fr> wrote: > We do dynamic binary translation. We are in a similar situation to qemu > except we are SystemC / TLM compliant for hardware and bus models. Our > current technology is somewhat like qemu, we translate the binary into > "semantic ops", which are pre-compiled at build time, like qemu.