similar to: Rsync performance with large exchange database files

Clean copy. I even used the -W flag to see if it made a difference but, nope. I'm testing this same test on some of my other servers too. See if there's any common-ground I can find. On another servers (MS SQL Server) with faster disks I tried a similar test just now. There's only the C drive on this server but I used my same test file from the other server and used rsync (3.1.0)

Thanks Lang, we are making progress! I no longer get the failed assertion, but the code I'm using for vregs that don't get allocated a preg, and thus need to be spilled and re-loaded is causing assembler errors. I suspect the problem is my code for allocating space in the stack, but I don't know how to fix it. I've attached a new version of the simple register-allocation

Hi Susan, In x86-64 the REX prefix must be used to access an extended register (r8-r15 and their aliases), but cannot be used when accessing the high byte of the ABCD regs (AH, BH, CH, DH). In your test case you have hardcoded %vreg1 to R8B, and %vreg15 to AH, and the test case contains a copy between these registers. The copy simultaneously must have a REX prefix, and cannot have a REX prefix,

Hi Again try to learn, how to make package. Now when I try to make from .src.rpm I get: [root at oh1mrr lataa]# rpmbuild --rebuild webmin-1.360-1.src.rpm Installing: webmin-1.360-1.src.rpm error: Legacy syntax is unsupported: copyright error: line 12: Unknown tag: Copyright: Freeware What's wrong with rpm? or me, eh? :D Also if I try install webmins noarc.rpm I don't get it work

Dear Eliza, Try this: Lines1<-readLines(textConnection("1911.01.01?????? 7.87 1911.01.02?????? 9.26 1911.01.03?????? 8.06 1911.01.04?????? 8.13 1911.01.05????? 12.90 1911.02.06?????? 5.45 1911.02.07?????? 3.26 1911.03.08?????? 5.70 1911.03.09?????? 9.24 1911.04.10?????? 7.60 1911.05.11????? 14.82 1911.05.12????? 14.10 1911.06.13?????? 7.87 1911.06.14?????? 9.26

I'm having a spot of bother with a large (900GB) partition. fdisk claims it's 900GB. I made an ext3 fs on it and df says it's only 94GB. Which is correct? Or did I do something wrong?

Hey y'all, got a weird one for you. I am unfortunately supporting this really weird Gluster volume, where it's a single-brick/single-node volume that has many files written every minute to it. Its very suboptimal, but I'm kind of stuck with it until the application team migrates off Linux 5 (yes... I know). gluster-server is running version 6.10, gluster-client is mounting via NFS as

is there a way to use the actual index value for plotting zoo objects this is the way that the index is set up and a sample range of what I would like to plot 01/01/06 00:00:00 - 01/01/06 23:45:00 { library(zoo) # chron library(chron) fmt.chron <- function(x) { chron(sub(" .*", "", x), gsub(".* (.*)", "\\1:00", x)) }} x <- structure(c(15.57, 15.5,

Hi All, I'm using the following code to produce some stacked bar graphs. *setwd("C:\\Users\\Tinus\\Documents\\NMMU\\R\\Seamounts")* *SChla <- read.csv("SM_Chla_data.csv")* * * *#Extract mean values from data file* * * *Coral <- SChla[185:223,] #Reduce SChla to Coral only* *coral <- with(Coral , aggregate(cbind(Pico, Nano, Micro), list(Depth),FUN=mean))*

Hi. I have 2 tables, with same dimensions (8000 x 5). Something like: tab1: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 14.23 1.71 2.43 15.6 127 13.20 1.78 2.14 11.2 100 13.16 2.36 2.67 18.6 101 14.37 1.95 2.50 16.8 113 13.24 2.59 2.87 21.0 118 tab2: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 1.23 1.1 2.3 1.6 17 1.20 1.8 2.4 1.2 10 1.16 2.6 2.7 1.6 11 1.37 1.5 2.0 1.8 13 1.24 2.9 2.7 2.0 18 I need generate a table of averages, the

I am wondering how to interpret the parameter estimates that lm() reports in this sort of situation: y = round(rnorm(n=24,mean=5,sd=2),2) A = gl(3,2,24,labels=c("one","two","three")) B = gl(4,6,24,labels=c("i","ii","iii","iv")) # Make both observations for A=1, B=4 missing y[19] = NA y[20] = NA data.frame(y,A,B) nonadd = lm(y ~

Hello, I am trying to filter a data set like below so that the peaks in the Phase value are more obvious and can be identified by a peak finding function following the useful advise of Carl Witthoft. I have written the following for(i in length(data$Phase)){ newphase=if(abs(data$Phase[i+1]-data$Phase[i])>6){ data$Phase[i+1] }else{data$Phase[i] } } I get the following error which I have not

Hi, Is there a tutorial on how to setup raid 1? I like to install CentOS 4.3 on a 160GB SATA drive and do a mirror on another identical 160GB SATA. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060708/1814179f/attachment-0002.html>

Hello! I''ve a ubuntu server running over a HVM DomU. After a hang, the domU doesn''t start again. The domU was not able to mount the virtual machine disk so I started with a live cd and I tried to mount the disk root part / with no success so I ran fsck.ext3 and it gave me input/output error in the domU and in dom0 the kernel says: Feb 14 18:22:28 scofield last message

On 2/13/19 8:30 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 13.2.2019 15.18, Robert Moskowitz via dovecot wrote: >> >> On 2/13/19 1:23 AM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote: >>> >>> Am 13. Februar 2019 00:34:15 schrieb Robert Moskowitz >>> <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>> >>>> On 2/12/19 6:03 PM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote:

I have a 1.5TB disk that has several partitions. One of them is 900GB. Now I can only see 300GB. Where is the rest? Is there a command I can do to reach the rest of the data? Will scrub help? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

I've only begun investigating R as a substitute for SPSS. I have a need to identify for each CASE the closest (or most similar) 5 other CASES (not including itself as it is automatically the closest). I have a fairly large matrix (50000 cases by 50 vars). In SPSS, I can use Correlate > Distances to generate a matrix of similarity, but only on a small sample. The entire matrix can not

I have a fresh install of Solaris 11 Express on a new SSD. I have inserted the old hard disk, and tried to import it, with: # zpool import -f <long id number> Old_rpool but the computer reboots. Why is that? On my old hard disk, I have 10-20 BE, starting with OpenSolaris 2009.06 and upgraded to b134 up to snv_151a. I also have a WinXP entry in GRUB. This hard disk is partitioned, with a

The goal is to build a file server. I already have an LVM that was automatically created in the installation of Centos, including partitions below (sda1): /Dev/mapper/centos-root /Dev/mapper/centos-swap I added a second disk on the server, which was identified as sdb. If you need to configure the shadow copy only on an LVM, for my case, what do you advise: - Create a new LVM only to the

On 2/13/19 1:23 AM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote: > > > Am 13. Februar 2019 00:34:15 schrieb Robert Moskowitz > <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > >> On 2/12/19 6:03 PM, Matthias Fechner via dovecot wrote: >>> Am 12.02.2019 um 17:05 schrieb Robert Moskowitz via dovecot: >>>> I have trying to find how to set the dovecot-sql.conf for using