similar to: compiling vs interpreting

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/js/jsatom.c | 6 - libswfdec/js/jsatom.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_debugger.c | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- libswfdec/swfdec_debugger.h | 16 +---- libswfdec/swfdec_edittext_movie.c | 4 - libswfdec/swfdec_event.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_js.c | 69

libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 1 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.h | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_js_movie.c | 3 - libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree c3f0eaf5706a0d972132a0ea4fcaff5aa79ec122 (from 3e6fcd37cb3157514beaf45cb90e2c68d2138b86) Author: Benjamin Otte

configure.ac | 2 libswfdec/Makefile.am | 4 libswfdec/js/jsfun.c | 11 libswfdec/js/jsfun.h | 1 libswfdec/js/jsgc.c | 29 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 14 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.h | 4 libswfdec/js/jsnum.c | 10 libswfdec/js/jsobj.c | 2

libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 3 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_js.c | 51 +++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_js.h | 8 + libswfdec/swfdec_js_global.c | 30 +++++ libswfdec/swfdec_js_movie.c | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 22 ---- libswfdec/swfdec_player.c |

configure.ac | 4 ++++ libswfdec/swfdec_bits.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- libswfdec/swfdec_debug.c | 14 +++++++------- libswfdec/swfdec_js.c | 35 ----------------------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- libswfdec/swfdec_sound.c | 2 +- 6 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree

libswfdec/js/jsinterp.h | 1 libswfdec/swfdec_bits.c | 28 +++ libswfdec/swfdec_bits.h | 9 - libswfdec/swfdec_codec_screen.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_image.c | 98 ++++-------- libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 315 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- libswfdec/swfdec_swf_decoder.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_tag.c | 23 -- 8 files

<p align=\"left\"><b><font face=\"Arial\" size=\"2\">GFI MailSecurity''s HTML threat engine found HTML scripts in this email and has disabled them.</font></b></p>Also... with the evalScripts method, try assigning your functions differently so they stay in memory (assign them as variables)... myalert = function(txt) {

libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_script.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree ae64862c94f18618313c90c28b4071d84693b7b5 (from 71b090ccdeedb1e96b2f8590844844139b00bd85) Author: Benjamin Otte <otte@gnome.org> Date: Wed Jan 31 21:35:50 2007 +0100 implement BitAnd, BitOr,

NEWS | 16 ++ configure.ac | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_internal.h | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_as_object.h | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_scriptable.c | 304 ----------------------------------------- libswfdec/swfdec_scriptable.h | 78 ---------- 6 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 386 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 4 libswfdec/js/jsapi.c | 6 - libswfdec/js/jsapi.h | 6 - libswfdec/js/jsfun.h | 2 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 2 libswfdec/js/jsobj.c | 8 - libswfdec/js/jsobj.h | 6 - libswfdec/js/jspubtd.h | 4 libswfdec/js/jsscope.c | 2

configure.ac | 2 libswfdec/Makefile.am | 13 libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 43 +-- libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.h | 7 libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 103 +++---- libswfdec/swfdec_as_script_function.c | 6

autogen.sh | 2 configure.ac | 39 +++ libswfdec/js/jsfun.c | 11 - libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 5 libswfdec/js/jsobj.c | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_debug.h | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_js.c | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_js_color.c | 33 +-- libswfdec/swfdec_js_movie.c | 25 -- libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c

I working on rebuilding my CMS software using AJAX, and have run into a couple problems I cant seem to find the solution to. I am loading up a new component of my system using the Ajax.Updater, and it loads up the HTML fine but as the component I am loading up is fairly complicated I want to load up its relevant javascript functions as well at the same time. I am using the

libswfdec-gtk/swfdec_playback_alsa.c | 6 - libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/js/jsinterp.c | 10 -- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.c | 50 ++++++++++- libswfdec/swfdec_as_context.h | 4 libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.c | 7 - libswfdec/swfdec_as_frame.h | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_as_function.c | 146

configure.ac | 27 +++ doc/Makefile.am | 3 doc/swfdec-docs.sgml | 1 doc/swfdec-sections.txt | 18 ++ doc/swfdec.types | 2 libswfdec-gtk/Makefile.am | 6 libswfdec-gtk/swfdec-gtk.h | 1 libswfdec-gtk/swfdec_gtk_loader.c | 243

NEWS | 12 ++++++++++++ configure.ac | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) New commits: diff-tree bca06937c45d0d89271681e0dbd3a2fbeeaa9dd0 (from 4c71feeaac91fa2ef52d22b83ba56c672d524ae0) Author: Benjamin Otte <otte@gnome.org> Date: Thu Feb 8 21:29:42 2007 +0100 back to cvs diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 055efb0..301a83a 100644 ---

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:27 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > Hi Steven, > > This looks interesting and raises a number of questions :) > > 1) Does applying this patch actually bring working sanitizers to x32 > platform? > That is, after you build the clang, does "clang -fsanitize=whatever foo.c" > compile/link/run with expected results? > I doubt that, as

libswfdec/Makefile.am | 2 libswfdec/swfdec_js.c | 5 + libswfdec/swfdec_js_mouse.c | 30 +++++- libswfdec/swfdec_listener.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_listener.h | 42 ++++++++ libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 3 libswfdec/swfdec_player.c | 55 +++++++++--

Finally it's good enough to release. Following the strict swfdec-does-not-crash policy, here's a completely fixed up backend to make all your Flash madness possible. swfdec-0.5.0 "Meet Plan Party!" http://swfdec.freedesktop.org/download/swfdec/0.5/swfdec-0.5.0.tar.gz MD5: 53c9dd7f87ec9a73277ceb4d7c033a3c swfdec-mozilla-0.5.0 "Destroy all the old prints in celebration"

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Steven Newbury <steve at snewbury.org.uk>wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:27 +0400, Alexey Samsonov wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > > > This looks interesting and raises a number of questions :) > > > > 1) Does applying this patch actually bring working sanitizers to x32 > > platform? > > That is, after you build the