similar to: what is the driver of vm's virtual ethernet?

Hello, i need to write a little personal patch in the bridge code. For this patch, i need to know the original src and dst mac addresses of the packet incoming to the bridge. As i work on a brouter (some packets are bridged, some are routed based on ebtable rules), packets that are routed have their mac addresses modified by the IP stack). I put a software probe in br_input.c::br_handle_frame( ),

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=339 ------- Additional Comments From scrizt@ludd.ltu.se 2006-06-26 17:57 MET ------- Is this bug forgotten ? Anyhow, I ran into it when setting up this strange network of mine.. I dont think my setup is causing anything strange however.. It appears even if no machine is connected to the "inner" port of the bridge.. I

OS: CentOS 6.5. After I set multicast_router of bridge and it's port to 2, like following: echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/eth81/bridge/multicast_router echo 2 > /sys/devices/virtual/net/bond2/brport/multicast_router Then soft lockup occured: Message from syslogd at node-0 at Jan 9 15:47:12 ... kernel:BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] And the call

On 05/12/2011 06:50 PM, Longguang Yue wrote: > > Thank you first of all > > totally, there are 5 kinds of error occur. > > Spinlock leads to cpu lockup, o2net modules panic, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:2969, BUG unable to handle kernel paging request at addr > > My environment: kernel-2.6.32.23 + xen + ocfs2(1.5) > > Thanks again. > This looks like the deadlock as

hi,all sometimes ping fails when enable stp , why? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140411/6c24ed40/attachment.html>

hi,all sometimes ping fails when enable stp , why? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140411/6c24ed40/attachment.html>

hi,all sometimes ping fails when enable stp , why? thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20140411/6c24ed40/attachment.html>

I have seen the following kernel panic 5 times today on three different machines, two of which had been stable for months and one of which is a brand new install. We are running the x86_64 xen kernel and userland tools that came in the Xen 3.1.0 tarball from xen.org, on top of scientific linux (redhat clone) 5.1 or 5.2. <Aug/28 12:21 pm>Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at

Looks like the GSO is involved? I got this while running Dom0 only (no guests), with a BOINC/Rosetta@home application running on all 4 cores. changeset: 10649:8e55c5c11475 Build: x86_32p (pae). ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c04dceb0>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.16.13-xen

This hook is protected with the RCU, so simple if (br_should_route_hook) br_should_route_hook(...) is not enough on some architectures. Use the rcu_dereference/rcu_assign_pointer in this case. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> --- diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index 3cedd4e..b42b192 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++

Hi, One of my servers has had its dom0 "oops" over and over twice in the last week. Unfortunately this is newly deployed so I have no idea if it is down to Xen or not. xen_changeset : Mon Dec 12 18:47:47 2005 +0100 8270:4ad23e798798 dom0 kernel is a vanilla 2.6.12 with Ralph''s .6+xen kernel patch applied. x86_32 sarge packages were used. The .config is

I have noticed a change in the linux bridge implementation between 2.1.15 and 2.1.17. Specifically, I do not think BPDU's (generated from another bridge) are passed across the bridge when STP is disabled. I think this relates to the LLC handling of BPDU's directly invoking br_bpdu_rcv. In 2.6.15, the br_handle_frame function would pass a BPDU to the br_handle_frame_finish function

Hi, i am testing two bridges by sending to it random packets using hping2. First i create a random-length file, then i send it a lot of time on the wire using this command: for ($i=0; $i<50000; $i++) { hping2 -q -c 1 -d $data_len -E random.file 10.0.0.10 } My problem is that some packets are lost. Here is my setup: PC1 (10.0.0.1) ===== BR1 --------- BR2 ===== PC2 (10.0.0.10)

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765 Summary: Netfilter crash on bridged/TAP device on 2.6.38 & 3.0 kernels Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: bridging

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:20:51 +0800 > @@ -1283,10 +1314,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, > skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0); > > rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb); > + > #ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS > - local_bh_disable(); > - netif_receive_skb(skb); > - local_bh_enable();

From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 13:20:51 +0800 > @@ -1283,10 +1314,15 @@ static ssize_t tun_get_user(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile, > skb_probe_transport_header(skb, 0); > > rxhash = skb_get_hash(skb); > + > #ifndef CONFIG_4KSTACKS > - local_bh_disable(); > - netif_receive_skb(skb); > - local_bh_enable();

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h > index 03ed492c4e14..0f4ba52b641d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -1421,6 +1421,8 @@ struct net_device_ops { > * entity (i.e. the master device for bridged veth)

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:55:13 -0700 Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h > index 03ed492c4e14..0f4ba52b641d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h > +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h > @@ -1421,6 +1421,8 @@ struct net_device_ops { > * entity (i.e. the master device for bridged veth)

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%

Hi: This series tries to implement tx batching support for vhost. This was done by using MSG_MORE as a hint for under layer socket. The backend (e.g tap) can then batch the packets temporarily in a list and submit it all once the number of bacthed exceeds a limitation. Tests shows obvious improvement on guest pktgen over over mlx4(noqueue) on host: Mpps -+%