similar to: Replication problem

At least doveconf -n output would help. I guess related to authentication settings. Are there any errors in logs? > On 1 Jun 2017, at 12.14, Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 30 May 2017 at 21:16, Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> wrote: >> >> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.30.tar.gz >>

Hi, I tried a fast search about domain controller replication limit without find without finding an answer. Can someone tell me if there are time limit of correct synchronization of domain controller turned off for a long time (like some days)? If yes what should be the time limit and what is better do when need to poweron domain controller that has passed that time? Can there be issue with

Hi all, I would like to ask if, and with how much success, you are using GlusterFS for virtual machine storage. My plan: I want to setup a 2-node cluster, where VM runs on the nodes themselves and can be live-migrated on demand. I have some questions: - do you use GlusterFS for similar setup? - if so, how do you feel about it? - if a node crashes/reboots, how the system re-syncs? Will the VM

Hi, Same symptoms here when upgrading from 2.2.29 to 2.2.30. Getting back to 2.2.29 resolve the problem. The client here is a webmail ( rainloop ). User automatically logout as if the auth did'nt succed although log show successfull login attempt My configuration 2.2.29.1 (e0b76e3): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.18 (29cc74d) # OS: Linux 4.11.2-gentoo-xxxx-std-ipv6-64

Hi All, I have a problem with SASL authentification from postfix when more than 10 mails is sent from the same user simultaneously Postfix abort connection ( Connection lost to authentication server ). Dovecot log after the postfix error an error about connection lost also ( read EOF ) I don't seem to find a parameter for a maximum of connection for the auth process ( ther's one for

With a single server - and no intent to have a second server online at this time - is it possible to use the replication service to keep a "live" backup? Or otherwise perform a storage format conversion? I'm presently using sdbox - and considering going back to mdbox though without SIS.? My intent now is ONLY a 1-way backup, to be kept current, and no clients will utilize the

At the moment the correct way to use shared folders in a replication pair is to access them with imapc from the other pair. Aki > On 29/10/2020 14:43 Ralf Becker <rb at egroupware.org> wrote: > > > In reference to an earlier mail from me, I'd like to ask: > > Have there been any changes in regard to INDEXPVT and replication or are > there any plans in that

Hello, i have some questions about the new dovecot replication and mdbox format. my company has currently 3 old dovecot 2.0.x fileserver/backend with ca. 120k mailboxes and ca. 6 TB data used. They are synchronised per drbd/corosync. Each fileserver/backend have ca. 40k mailboxes im Maildir format. Our MX server is delivering ca. 30 GB new mails per day. Two IMAP proxy server get the

Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other

Hi, I have a failover cluster for mail server with: Ubuntu12.04 + DRBD (for block replication) + Ext4 filesystem + Dovecot-2.0.19-2 with Mdbox It works fine with ~50k accounts. My cluster design: http://adminlinux.com.br/cluster_design.txt I plan to test Dovecot Replication with dsync to build an active/active cluster with load balancing. Can anyone direct me to some literature? A tutorial

On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 11:53:35 +0200 Fabio Fantoni via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, I tried a fast search about domain controller replication limit > without find without finding an answer. > > Can someone tell me if there are time limit of correct > synchronization of domain controller turned off for a long time (like > some days)? If yes what should be

Il 16/07/20 12:40, Gerald Galster ha scritto: >> Some missing infos... >> >> - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and >> not the DNS >> - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" >> - About 20 domains and 3000 email >> - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon >> - The backend

Good morning, I?m looking at dovecot replication for the first time for a particular use case: The VM running dovecot is currently in a public cloud, and I want to move it on-premises, so I want to replicate all mail data from the older instance to the new (then cutover internal DNS) (and in the process update to newer features on the internal instance such as mdbox vs Maildir). However, the

Do both replication nodes need to be updated at the same time? Or can a 2.2(.36.4) node replicate with a 2.3(.10.1)? Ralf -- Ralf Becker EGroupware GmbH [www.egroupware.org] Handelsregister HRB Kaiserslautern 3587 Gesch?ftsf?hrer Birgit und Ralf Becker Leibnizstr. 17, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany Telefon +49 631 31657-0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

> On 16/07/2019 18:40 Stuart Henderson via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > On 2019-07-13, Reio Remma via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I noticed these in the logs since upgrading from 2.3.6. to 2.3.7: > > > > Jul 13 11:52:10 turin dovecot: doveadm: Error: > > dsync-remote(reio at

It happened now twice that replication created folders and mails in the wrong mailbox :( Here's the architecture we use: - 2 Dovecot (2.2.32) backends in two different datacenters replicating via a VPN connection - Dovecot directors in both datacenters talks to both backends with vhost_count of 100 vs 1 for local vs remote backend - backends use proxy dict via a unix domain socket and socat

Timo, I use mdbox and probably have similar issue, but in my case only shared mailboxes were affected. May 26 12:35:05 mx10 dovecot: doveadm: Error: dsync-remote(anna.harina at bgoperator.com): Error: Mailbox shared/l.davydjanc at bgoperator.com/russia: Save commit failed: Message has been copied too many times (50045 + 1) May 26 12:35:19 mx10 dovecot: dsync-local(anna.harina at

Can you somehow reproduce this issue with auth_debug=yes and mail_debug=yes and provide those logs? Aki On 02.11.2017 10:55, Ralf Becker wrote: > No one any idea? > > Replication into wrong mailboxes caused by an unavailable proxy dict > backend is a serious privacy and/or security problem! > > Ralf > > Am 30.10.17 um 10:05 schrieb Ralf Becker: >> It happened now

Hi list, this question was already posted a few years ago (https://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2014-November/098585.html). I already asked the original queriest and he told me, that he never got an solution or workaround but it was not important enough for him. When using replication in conjunction with sieve vacations, the .dovecot.lda-dupes file is not synced with the other server. So when

Hello Get this on first write made ( by deliver sending mail to inform of the restart of services ) Home partition (the one receiving the mail) is based on ocfs2 created from drbd block device in primary/primary mode These drbd devices are based on lvm. system is running linux-3.5.0, identical symptom with linux 3.3 and 3.2 but working with linux 3.0 kernel reproduced on two machines ( so