similar to: Multiple servers and NFS

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>

There was a lengthy power failure here in Shoreline this morning and my firewall did not come back up when power was restored. The firewall is now up and service to the server has been restored. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \

Hello list, I built an email system using a proxy / director pair (IMAP, POP3, LMTP) and a backend pair. To have an HA system, I would like to understand if it is better to use an NFS export or replication to save emails and index files NFS is provided by a NAS (in HA), while for replication I would use the local backend disks Which of the two systems is more reliable? Are there any drawbacks

Thank you all for replies!!! Some missing infos... - As load balancer I'm using a pair of keepalived with simple setup and not the DNS - Load balancer algorithm is "Weighted Least-Connection" - About 20 domains and 3000 email - I'm monitoring my backend servers with poolmon - The backend servers are virtual machine (vmware) with datastore on "all flash" storage based

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1381 Bug ID: 1381 Summary: Conntrackd segfaults when committing external caches Product: conntrack-tools Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: conntrack-daemon

Hi all, We are investigating on firewall failover design. I have searched the net and found that projects like LVS have it mostly solved for their side but that netfilter lacks it. Of course, a simple failover of the firewall is available using things like VRRP (KeepAlive software) but without state syncronization, and that is preciselly the part we need to investigate. Is this issue

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.

On 2/19/2018 12:09 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: Sounds good and no problem at all. Will look out for this update in the future. In the meantime, three's a few things I'll try including your suggestion. Was looking for a sense of direction with the projects and now you've given that. Ty. Appreciated! Cheers, Tom > On 02/19/2018 11:37 AM, TomK wrote: >> On 2/19/2018

On 02/25/2018 08:29 PM, TomK wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster.? ( Used > Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) > > If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on centos 3.4? It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm) Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl

Hello, I have recently setup mailserver solution using 2-node master-master setup (mainly based on MySQL M-M replication and GlusterFS with 2 replica volume) on Ubuntu 14.04 (Dovecot 2.2.9). Unfortunately even with shared-storage-aware setting: mail_nfs_index = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_fsync = always mmap_disable = yes ..I have hit strange issues pretty soon especially when user was

Hi I have two server directors in ring and 5 dovecot servers (2.2.36) IP for IMAP and POP3 is a VIP (keepalived) What is the best solutions to get realy HA for 5 dovecot servers ? Maby corosync+pacemeker ? But this solution is too problematic and hardcore Why I need HA ? Doveadmin is too lazy and doveadm director does not know that one machine broke down and still sends traffic

I have 2 firewall in HA with keepalived. Can I use active the same tinc configuration on 2 firewalls ? using tun Interface with same ip on all 2 nodes is a problem ? tun device advertise itself on the network having an IP/MAC pairs (ARP) or the IP is only used by the system internally for routing so using the same configuration is right ? so one firewall be active, the other is passive. With this

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I stated pure observation on at least two pairs of primary - backup MX I > maintain. Still I made backup MXes with greylisting as well (they are > separately hit by same bad spammers scripts, at a rate about 10 times > smaller than primary MXes are and absolutely independently). I think

On 9/06/20 2:56 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > I hit another limitation. My backup MX handler is a 3rd party who > will not use greylisting. Thus all the 1st timers I rejected just > delivered to my alternate MX address and were not blocked at all. Don't use a backup MX, they are a relic of the 90s when mail servers were often times not always online. a sending mail server will

Greetings. I set up a new Samba 4 AD Server and I have some errors. On the tree 4.1 this errors not appeared and until 4.2.3: - On the RSAT: GPO Management ---> Computer Settings ---> Policies ---> Windows Settings ---> Security Settings, the console gave this error: "Windows cannot load the temnplate", and not show several options. - Another error: "The Server Is

Hello, I am working on setting up an Active/Passive Samba cluster on Ubuntu 14.04 using Samba 4.1.6. Samba will be sharing an NFS mount so that it can be accessible to CIFS clients. Thus, the server setup is as follows: -- cifs0 -- / \ / \ NFS_Server VIP --- CIFS clients \ / \ /

Hello List: Recently our shorewall FW server went dead (PS failure) & brought the entire system down. Luckily we are testing the FW and other servers, so we did not loose anything. Now we have decided to setup two Shorewall FW servers with a primary & another fallover FW server. I have done some research cruised the Internet and found that a product ''UCARP''