similar to: Difference btw. Dovecot Director and Dovecot Proxy

Hi, we are getting some core dumps with signal 6 in ltmp on a dovecot director proxy server, like this: Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Panic: file lmtp-proxy.c: line 376 (lmtp_proxy_output_timeout): assertion failed: (proxy->data_input->eof) Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0() [0x363323d99a] ->

Hello, i am delivering Mail from postfix via LMTP to dovecot. I am using the director also for LMTP. As long as i connect to the dovecot LMTP TCP socket from postfix everything is working. postfix main.cf: virtual_transport= lmtp:localhost:30025 But when i try to switch to the local socket postfix main.cf: virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp The dovecot proxy tries to

Hi, After updating some of our director servers from 2.2.36 to 2.3.3 (dcead646b) we experience crashes in about 1/5000 mails in lmtp delivery: Nov 13 12:23:36 Fatal: lmtp(113620): master: service(lmtp): child 113620 killed with signal 6 (core dumped) Nov 13 12:23:36 Panic: lmtp(113623): file ostream-dot.c: line 208 (o_stream_dot_sendv): assertion failed: ((size_t)ret == sent + added) Nov 13

Hi, I have a timeout problem only when I have heavy load in my system. I have two director servers directing to 4 backend servers. The problem is when my smtp relays tries to deliver mail to my users via lmtp (proxied with director). In the smtp logs I have: Jun 12 11:41:18 xenon13 postfix/lmtp[4248]: 4433E5D5A0: to=<myuser at um.es>, relay=pop.um.es[155.54.212.106]:24, delay=31,

Hi all, I have a setup of some nodes running Dovecot 2.0.13 and Postfix 2.5.6 with storage in NFS and authentication happening with PAM. Poking around in the wiki, I tried out different possibilities but now I am stuck -- and are hoping for your (enlightening) comments and tips. My planned setup for IMAP and LMTP is like this: IMAP ==== 1. A loadbalancer directs new sessions to a

Hi, Director -> Backends -> NFS setup. Problem: Broken dovecot-uidlists because of our postfix LMTP delivery using a different address than the IMAP client lookups Error: Mailbox INBOX: Broken file dovecot-uidlist line 169: Invalid data: example: LMTP delivery: lmtp(info#domain.nl at mail.local) IMAP lookup: info at domain.nl doveadm director status info#domain.nl at mail.local

Hi, I've almost finished my new director based setup, but in the first test I discovered that imap and lmtp connections were not always being proxied to the same server. After some research now I think that the main problem is that in imap connections users connect as 'username' while lmtp connections are as 'username at mailserver'. In my current setup I receive mail via

Hello, Following Jan-Frode's advise I am trying this configuration: {postfix} ---lmtp---> {director} ---lmtp---> {dovecot} so I have two dovecot instances for director/proxy and lmtp delivery on ports 1024 and 24 respectively. whilst for imap connections I can specify a pool of imap backend servers via 'director_mail_servers' it seems is not possible with lmtp. Sep 12

Hi, the lmtp service of our dovecot director installation quits with a segmentation fault if a lot of mails are simultaneously delivered. For example if the postfix mailqueue is filled (for whatever reason) and postqueue -f is run the lmtp service quits with a segmentation fault: Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0? o_stream_cork (stream=0x0)

Hello Timo, The last time I checked my understanding about director was that : 1. backend/"real" imap servers should not be on the same host (or the same dovecot instance) to avoid proxying loops. Is it still the case with the latest 2.1 stable release ? Is there a plan to be able to run director and real server on the same host, thus requiring only 2 hosts instead of 4 to have

Hi, I've been running dovecot for many years, but now i've hit a strange problem. when retrieving imap there is sometimes in 1 of 4 imap requests a 4sec latency. * notes: - connected directly to the backends this latency disappears - removing a director from the loadbalancer(lvs) so i'm the only connected to the director this latency disappears too I would appreciate some feedback

hi all, I've been tasked to add sieve/managesieve to an existing dovecot cluster running 2.1.7 on debian wheezy which is made up of 2 dovecot-proxy hosts as directors and some back end dovecot imap hosts all running the same version. My problem is that I thought to put the service on the director/proxy hosts since they wouldn't have too much load on it, but when I do I get the

Hi there, I'm using NFS with Dovecot 2.0.20 and would like to deliver a quota warning to the user using the LMTP director. I have configured quota warnings according to http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Configuration But it seems that lda delivers the mail directly to the local filesystem and is not using our lmtp director, which prevents NFS mailboxes from getting corrupted. Is there a way to

Hello, i'm test system dovecot (proxy with director) and backend storage, auth LDAP server (user plain passwords) If i use plain auth, work fine. If connect DIGEST-MD5 or CRAM-MD5 proxy not redirect connection (Requested DIGEST-MD5 scheme, but we have a NULL password) ### Frontend proxy+director # dovecot -n # 2.2.19: /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE amd64

Hi Timo & Dovecot users, We have a 2-node director setup which front-ends for 4 nodes which share a clustered filesystem (GFS). All nodes run Dovecot 2.0.18. Approximately 40k users, but typically only a few thousand active at any time. The director nodes run sendmail, which deliver mail "locally" using LMTP to the director, which then feeds to SMTP on the real servers (also

Hi everyone, short version: Is there no built in failover mechanism for the director service to handle a backend failure? Long version: I have a frontend server running the director service and two backends. Due to maintenance I had to shut down one of the backends which caused connection errors for the users being directed to this backend. I was very surprised as I expected the director to

Hello all, If I have several postfix/dovecot-lda boxes with shared nfs storage, how director helps in this scenario? is it necesary to use lmtp instead of dovecot-lda? With postfix/dovecot-lda boxes incoming mail happens at the smtp layer but director redirects are working in the lmtp/imap/pop3 layer.

HI All, I have setup my Dovecot director proxies and Dovecot backend mail stores.? I intend setting up several incoming and outgoing Exim MTA's.? I am a bit confused about what I need to run on the backend Dovecot MTA's to get the incoming mail delivered to them.? Do I need to install Exim on them or use LMTP to receive mail from the MTA's?? Also, can I directly deliver mail to the

Hello, I've been using dovecot for a long time, but now I'm having troubles with I change I need to make. I have a director server in front of two backend servers. All of these servers are running dovecot 2.1.16. Redirection to backend servers are based in an attribute of a ldap server. My users are defined in this same ldap server. At this moment, for user authentication we use

Hello, we want to migrate our dovecot 1.2 installation to verison 2.0 and want to use the director feature of version 2. Currently we have a two tier archtiecture, with dovecot proxys and a mailstore togehter with indexes on NFS. (With the common problems of this setup...) For the final setup we want to utilize the director for all protocols (IMAP,POP,LMTP,SIEVE). During the transition phase we