Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "HIGHESTMODSEQ tracking"
2012 Apr 10
1
Bug in HIGHESTMODSEQ when MODSEQ tracking is not enabled for version 2.0.18.
Greetings,
I'm new to the list. I have encountered what I believe to be a bug in the return of HIGHESTMODSEQ when talking to a IMAP client. HIGHESTMODSEQ does not appear to be incrementing when a new message arrives. The exact steps I took are:
1) Create a new mail account
2) Send a mail to the account, check that you can receive the email. Send a second mail to the account.
3) perform a
2017 Apr 04
3
Problem with Dovecot and BlackBerry
Hi all,
i've got a strange behaviour with a BlackBerry Classic Phone (BBOS
10.3.2.2876) in combination with Dovecot 2.2.13 while trying to fetch
mails.
Before burying myself into debugging sessions, i try to get an
understanding if the following is a Client- or a Server-specific error
in the behaviour:
CIGA8 UID FETCH 10009:10035 (UID FLAGS) (CHANGEDSINCE NOMODSEQ)
CIGA8 BAD Error
2008 Mar 13
2
CONDSTORE + QRESYNC extensions
I wrote a mostly-working CONDSTORE support for Dovecot today. You can
try it with:
hg clone http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-condstore/
There are a few problems left:
- STORE FLAGS.SILENT should be sending FETCH MODSEQ updates
- When SELECTing a mailbox while CONDSTORE hasn't yet been enabled in
the session, Dovecot returns a higher HIGHESTMODSEQ than what's used
after CONDSTORE is
2010 Feb 01
1
Extraneous information
Not technically a bug, but a small waste of bandwidth: it seems (at
least as of 1.2.10) that if neither CONDSTORE/QRESYNC are enabled
dovecot still sends HIGHESTMODSEQ info:
a examine Testing.AAA
* FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Forwarded impflag0
impflag1 impflag2)
* OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox.
* 309 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UNSEEN 5] First unseen.
* OK
2015 Jul 19
1
RFC 5465 (NOTIFY) violation: missing HIGHESTMODSEQ in initial STATUS responses
Quoting RFC 5465 (NOTIFY):
?If the NOTIFY command enables MessageNew, MessageExpunge,
AnnotationChange, or FlagChange notifications for a mailbox other
than the currently selected mailbox, and the client has specified
the STATUS indicator parameter, then the server MUST send a STATUS
response for that mailbox before NOTIFY's tagged OK. [?]
If either AnnotationChange or
2013 Dec 20
2
v2.2.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz.sig
I've been really busy the last few months, as I guess people in Dovecot mailing list have seen since I haven't been very responsive. There are at least some dsync bugs I haven't had time to look into yet. The busyness probably continues for a while more, but the next year is
2013 Dec 20
2
v2.2.10 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.10.tar.gz.sig
I've been really busy the last few months, as I guess people in Dovecot mailing list have seen since I haven't been very responsive. There are at least some dsync bugs I haven't had time to look into yet. The busyness probably continues for a while more, but the next year is
2008 Oct 24
1
Bug in QRESYNC SELECT/EXAMINE behavior
RFC 5162 [3.1] states that a QRESYNC should return all changes in a
SELECT/EXAMINE since the given modseq. In the following case, it
looks like there is an off-by-1 error somewhere:
C: A64 SELECT "TestMailboxTest" (QRESYNC (1224531494 6 1,3:5))
[MMS: MODSEQ given is 6]
S: * OK [CLOSED]
S: * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft)
S: * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS (\Answered \Flagged
2012 Apr 23
8
v2.1.5 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig
A few announcements first:
I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as
2012 Apr 23
8
v2.1.5 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.5.tar.gz.sig
A few announcements first:
I'm now going to start being more strict about not answering Dovecot questions sent to me privately (especially support requests, but also bug reports, feature requests, etc). Often those questions could be answered by other people in the mailing list as
2008 Jun 09
3
v1.2 development tree started
I merged all the new features and latest v1.1 changes under one tree:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/
The changeset order is kind of weird though. The timestamps jump all
around. Wonder if there's a way to reorder them so that it looks more
sane..
The status of the new features:
1. CONDSTORE extension is probably the largest change. It adds new
"modification sequences" for
2008 Sep 05
4
v1.2.alpha1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig
This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to
dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or
v1.2.rc1.
I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes
like there were in 0.99->1.0 or
2008 Sep 05
4
v1.2.alpha1 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz
http://dovecot.org/releases/1.2/alpha/dovecot-1.2.alpha1.tar.gz.sig
This is the only v1.2.alpha announcement I'm going to send to
dovecot-news list. Next announcement will be for either v1.2.beta1 or
v1.2.rc1.
I'm hoping that v1.2 stabilizes pretty soon. There are no huge changes
like there were in 0.99->1.0 or
2012 Nov 05
2
Issues with VANISHED CHANGEDSINCE
I've been seeing the following wonky behavior with Dovecot. Currently
this is with Dovecot 2.0.19, but I was also seeing it in earlier
versions as well, including versions from the 1.x series. Some
background, this is from Horde's ActiveSync library, when it is trying
to determine what UIDs have recently been expunged. I can guarantee
that when this command was sent, there was
2020 Feb 06
2
doveadm backup -R -m -s not picking up a new message
Good morning,
I use ?doveadm backup -R -m foo -s $state? to create a local mirror of
an imapc remote folder. When I run that command, wait for it to finish,
deliver a new message to the remote folder, and run that command again,
the new message does not get downloaded from the remote.
I'll attach the rawlog, doveconf, etc at the end. Allow me first to
summarize what I've already
2017 Apr 06
0
Problem with Dovecot and BlackBerry
On Tue, 04 Apr 2017 11:07:26 +0000
Luca Bertoncello <lucabert at lucabert.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've got a strange behaviour with a BlackBerry Classic Phone (BBOS
> 10.3.2.2876) in combination with Dovecot 2.2.13 while trying to
> fetch mails.
>
> Before burying myself into debugging sessions, i try to get an
> understanding if the following is a Client-
2020 Oct 09
3
HIGHESTMODSEQ replication issue
Hello,
I'm using dovecot 2.3.10 in OpenSUSE and I have configured a
master/master replication between two backends, it works well but I have
found an issue with the replication of the HIGHESTMODSEQ.
When I move a set of message from a mailbox to other, e.g. move 3
messages from INBOX to Junk, the HIGHESTMODSEQ get different on each
server, with no errors in the log:
[Borrador] 34:34
2008 Oct 15
1
Bug: MODSEQ FETCH return (?)
Hi Timo - hope things are well :) Playing around with the CONDSTORE
(RFC 4551) stuff while testing the IMAP lib I am writing and I think I
have found a bug in Dovecot 1.2.
RFC 4551 [4] identifies the FETCH response to a MODSEQ request as follows:
fetch-mod-resp = "MODSEQ" SP "(" permsg-modsequence ")"
with 'permsg-modsequence' defined as:
2008 May 01
5
Replication protocol design #2
Changes:
- Added goal 8 and rewrote mailbox synchronization plan.
- Added new SELECT command to change active mailbox and removed mailbox
ID from command parameters
Goals
-----
1. If a single (or configurable number of) server dies, no mails must be
lost that have been reported to IMAP/SMTP clients as being successfully
stored.
2. Must be able to automatically recover from a server
2014 Sep 09
1
My Dsync isn't replicating 'EXPUNGE' IMAP command
Hi!
I have two Dovecot-2.2.13 servers with Dsync Replication: server1 and
server2.
When I execute 'EXPUNGE' on server1 side, the messages with FLAG
\Deleted are expunged only on server1. The message is still present in
Server2.
Could someone give me a hint reason for this ?
Thanks in advance!
--
Thiago Henrique
======================================================================