similar to: Combining userdbs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Combining userdbs"

2014 Jan 25
1
userdb maildir permission denied in 2.1.7
Dear All, I'm using version 2.1.7 which currently ships with debian stable. I'd like to use userdb { driver = passwd-file args = username_format=%n /etc/dovecot/users default_fields = uid=vmail gid=vmail override_fields = skip = never result_failure = continue result_internalfail = continue result_success = return-ok } from [1]. The error message is: Jan 25
2014 May 11
1
Segfault with passwd as a second userdb at auth_fields_rollback
Hello, I've been trying to set up dovecot to support passwd-file + passwd/PAM auth. I made an unusual config (passwd-file as userdb failed to work for me), which uses static as userdb: =============== passdb { driver = passwd-file args = username_format=%u scheme=CRYPT /etc/dovecot/users } userdb { driver = static default_fields = uid=vmail gid=vmail home=/var/spool/mail/%d/%n }
2020 Sep 03
0
ltmp delivery with ldap and prefetch
I am able to authorize and connect via imap. But I am not able to deliver a message via lmtp I am getting this error message. passdb didn't return userdb entries, trying the next userdb [1] dovecot-ldap.conf.ext pass_attrs = uid=user,userPassword=password,host=host,homeDirectory=userdb_home,uidNu mber=userdb_uid,gidNumber=userdb_gid user_attrs =
2016 Jul 10
3
Panic: file mdbox-save.c: line 337: unreached
Recently updated to 2.2.25. Noticed a migration script I've been previously running fine started giving me the errors below. Remove server doesn't log any failure. doveconf -n attached. + /bin/doveadm -o mail_fsync=never backup -R -u user at domain.com imapc: dsync(user at domain.com): Panic: file mdbox-save.c: line 337: unreached dsync(user at domain.com): Error: Raw backtrace:
2014 Sep 22
0
numeric username
Heya, does dovecot support "numeric only" usernames (in format "^0-9+$")? We are unable to deliver emails to such usernames via LMTP: Sep 22 08:41:05 razor4 postfix/lmtp[2120]: D4FD91CDC11F: to=<231588 at example.org>, relay=example.org[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=217653, delays=217653/0.01/0.02/0, dsn=4.2.0, status=deferred (host example.org[private/dovecot-lmtp]
2017 Jan 19
0
Segfault on LIST Command
The Problem arises due to a NULL deref in mail_namespaces.c line 601. Backtrace below x LIST "" "" Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. mail_namespaces_get_root_sep (namespaces=0x0) at mail-namespace.c:601 601 while ((namespaces->flags & NAMESPACE_FLAG_LIST_PREFIX) == 0) (gdb) bt #0 mail_namespaces_get_root_sep (namespaces=0x0) at mail-namespace.c:601
2014 Nov 21
1
Unable to see virtual users
I have a new Dovecot v2.2.9 installation and am having trouble getting virtual users recognized. Also, the example configuration listed on the Wiki generates config errors. Note that I haven't tried running dovecot yet, I wanted to verify that the config looked good first. First, my configuration. I'm trying to use /etc/dovecot/users as my combined userdb and passdb file, with all
2014 Dec 16
2
LDAP: Connection appears to be hanging, reconnecting
Hello List I have a strange problem here which i try to analyse, but i'm stuck. Maybe someone has a hint? What happened: A few weeks ago one of the LDAPS Servers which is not maintained by us has crashed. From that moment on, users could still login to check their emails, but they were not able to send any email through postfix (which uses smtpd_sasl_type = dovecot) What i do not
2017 Jan 23
0
Segfault on LIST Command
Hi, I did added the default location and stripped down my config to a very basic level, dropping all plugins and database queries, see below. The segfault still appears in the same location. As I have build from source, I wonder whether you can reproduce the problem? Thorsten $ doveconf -n # 2.2.26.0 (23d1de6): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.16 (1dc4c73) # OS:
2015 Nov 21
0
Disabling auth fallback to PAM
> On 17 Nov 2015, at 22:51, martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > According to the wiki,? it's considered a feature of Dovecot and its > ability to support multiple authentication sources that "if the > password doesn't match in the first database, it checks the next > one". > > ?)
2019 Mar 30
3
Trying to track down source of duplicate messages
Hi, I have a fedora28 system with dovecot-2.3.5 and I'm trying to figure out why I'm increasingly receiving duplicate emails. The message IDs are exactly the same. It's always two of the same messages. I don't think it's ever occurred in the inbox. It doesn't happen with every message or seemingly in every folder. I've read about dovecot deduplicate, but of course I
2017 Jan 23
0
Segfault on LIST Command
OK, I found the problem in my config. If I use an default namespace with an empty name, instead of "inbox" it works as expected. Here the log for this case Starting program: /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap -u **** imap(****): Debug: auth input: **** home=**** uid=48 gid=48 quota_rule=*:bytes=1000M imap(****): Debug: Added userdb setting: plugin/quota_rule=*:bytes=1000M Debug: Effective
2017 Jan 23
0
Segfault on LIST Command
This is fixed in 2.2.27 with ddc96f7 lib-storage: Fixed error handling in list=children checking Aki On 23.01.2017 12:00, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Thank you for your report. > > Aki > > On 23.01.2017 11:56, Thorsten Hater wrote: >> OK, I found the problem in my config. If I use an default namespace with an >> empty >> name, instead of "inbox" it works as
2019 Nov 19
1
Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1142 (smtp_client_connection_established)
I'm using dovecot in a multi server setup. Two directors forward pop3, imap and smtp to backend dovecots with their central storage on NFS. Yesterday I stumbled upon these log lines: 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Info: Connect from 172.22.1.6 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1142 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed:
2015 Oct 12
0
iterate users with passwd-file passdb?
Apologies for the basic question, but I've been googling and can't figure out if this is possible or not. Simply: Is it possible to iterate over users if I'm using the passwd-file passdb driver? Do I need a SQL-based driver if I want to iterate? Here's what I've got right now. I don't have many users, and would prefer to retain the simplicity of the passwd-file if
2017 Jan 02
1
two listeners with different "driver = " configs
> On 31 Dec 2016, at 11.38, mj <lists at merit.unu.edu> wrote: > > Hi, > > Does the lack of replies mean that what I'm asking is not possible? > > (or am I missing something SO obvious that nobody bothers to point it out..?) > It is difficult. what you might be able to do is to configure multiple inet_listeners and then use CoS setup with multiple passdb:s.
2017 Feb 24
0
Users with multiple password
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, Eirik Rye wrote: > 2. Multiple passdbs(?) Check out http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase result_failure = continue result_internalfail = continue result_success = return-ok - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBWLBJDHz1H7kL/d9rAQLffwf/X7qZCiQ/a/dVYPVLC+Ie+RoFqwl/W96m
2019 Mar 17
0
LMTP Proxy failure using master login via destuser field
Hi list, I set up dovecot as IMAP proxy using a master user to login into the backend and it works beautifully. ?? Next I set out to do LMTP proxying and I struggled (initially). I got the log message: Mar 17 11:23:44 mail postfix/lmtp[2665]: 99A3F219C8: to=<johnny at doe.com>, relay=10.15.1.2[10.15.1.2]:24, delay=5.1, delays=4.9/0.05/0.01/0.07, dsn=5.1.1, status=bounced (host
2016 Jul 09
2
Raw backtrace multiple passwords not allowed
Hi Recently enabled support for encrypted passwords on my proxies - CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, NTLM and APOP to support some new users. Most users are working perfectly though every so often I see this happening in the logs: Jul 09 06:32:51 auth: Error: ldap(user at domain.com,192.168.10.90,<mOWiFi431eDKOsBS>): Multiple password values not supported Jul 09 06:32:51 auth: Panic: file
2019 Mar 02
0
Unexpected behavior with sieve_vacation_to_header_ignore_envelope = yes
Op 27/02/2019 om 13:30 schreef Matthias Petermann via dovecot: > Hello, > > we face an issue with the vacation extension of pigeonhole. Our > upstream mail server (from which we pull our E-Mails with POP3) uses > SPF and performs a SRS re-write of the Return Path. Once the mail is > processed via our local postfix, it is delivered via dovecot deliver > (using the lda).